document_title: History of the Philippines (1898–1946)

question_text: when did the us give back the philippines

question_tokens: when did the us give back the philippines

text: History of the Philippines (1898–1946)

text: Historical perspective[edit]

text: The Philippine Revolution began in August 1896 and ended with the Pact of Biak-na-Bato, a ceasefire between the Spanish colonial Governor-General Fernando Primo de Rivera and the revolutionary leader Emilio Aguinaldo which was signed on December 15, 1897. The terms of the pact called for Aguinaldo and his militia to surrender. Other revolutionary leaders were given amnesty and a monetary indemnity by the Spanish government in return for which the rebel government agreed to go into exile in Hong Kong.[3][4][5]

text: Spanish–American War period (1898)[edit]

text: The failure of Spain to engage in active social reforms in Cuba as demanded by the United States government was the basic cause for the Spanish–American War. American attention was focused on the issue after the mysterious explosion that sank the American battleship Maine on February 15, 1898 in Havana Harbor. As public political pressure from the Democratic Party and certain industrialists built up for war, the U.S. Congress forced the reluctant Republican President William McKinley to issue an ultimatum to Spain on April 19, 1898. Spain found it had no diplomatic support in Europe, but nevertheless declared war; the U.S. followed on April 25 with its own declaration of war.[6][7]

text: Theodore Roosevelt, who was at that time Assistant Secretary of the Navy, ordered Commodore George Dewey, commanding the Asiatic Squadron of the United States Navy: "Order the squadron ...to Hong Kong. Keep full of coal. In the event of declaration of war Spain, your duty will be to see that the Spanish squadron does not leave the Asiatic coast, and then offensive operations in Philippine Islands." Dewey's squadron departed on April 27 for the Philippines, reaching Manila Bay on the evening of April 30.[8]

text: Battle of Manila Bay[edit]

text: The first battle of the Spanish–American War took place in the Philippines on May 1, 1898. In a matter of hours, Commodore Dewey's Asiatic Squadron defeated the Spanish squadron under Admiral Patricio Montojo.[9][10] The U.S. squadron took control of the arsenal and navy yard at Cavite. Dewey cabled Washington, stating that although he controlled Manila Bay, he needed 5,000 additional men to seize Manila itself.[9]

text: U.S. preparation for land-based operations[edit]

text: The unexpected rapidity and completeness of Dewey's victory in the first engagement of the war prompted the McKinley administration to make the decision to capture Manila from the Spanish. The United States Army began to assemble the Eighth Army Corps—a military unit which would consist of 10,844 soldiers under the command of Major General Wesley Merritt—in preparation for deployment to the Philippines.[9]

text: While awaiting the arrival of troops from the Eighth Corps, Dewey dispatched the cutter USRC McCulloch to Hong Kong to transport Aguinaldo back to the Philippines. Aguinaldo arrived on May 19 and, after a brief meeting with Dewey, resumed revolutionary activities against the Spanish. On May 24, Aguinaldo issued a proclamation in which he assumed command of all Philippine forces and announced his intention to establish a dictatorial government with himself as dictator, saying that he would resign in favor of a duly elected president.[11]

text: Public jubilation marked Aguinaldo's return. Many Filipino enlisted men deserted local Spanish army units to join Aguinaldo's command and the Philippine Revolution against Spain resumed. Soon, many cities such as Imus, Bacoor, Parañaque, Las Piñas, Morong, Macabebe and San Fernando, as well as some entire provinces such as Laguna, Batangas, Bulacan, Nueva Ecija, Bataan, Tayabas (now Quezon), and the Camarines provinces, were liberated by the Filipinos and the port of Dalahican in Cavite was secured.[12]

text: The first contingent of American troops arrived on 30 June under the command of Brigadier General Thomas McArthur Anderson, commander of Eighth Corps' 2d Division (U.S. brigade and division numbers of the era were not unique throughout the army). General Anderson wrote to Aguinaldo, requesting his cooperation in military operations against the Spanish forces.[13] Aguinaldo responded, thanking General Anderson for his amicable sentiments, but saying nothing about military cooperation. General Anderson did not renew the request.[13]

text: The 2d Brigade, 2d Division, Eighth Corps arrived on July 17, under the command of Brigadier General Francis V. Greene. Major General Merritt (the Commander in Chief of the Philippine Expedition) and his staff arrived at Cavite on July 25. The 1st Brigade of the corps' 2d Division arrived on July 30, under the command of Brigadier General Arthur MacArthur.[14]

text: Philippine declaration of independence and establishment of Philippine governments[edit]

text: On 12 June 1898, Aguinaldo proclaimed the independence of the Philippines at his house in Cavite El Viejo.[15][16] Ambrosio Rianzares Bautista wrote the Philippine Declaration of Independence, and read this document in Spanish that day at Aguinaldo's house.[17] On 18 June, Aguinaldo issued a decree formally establishing his dictatorial government.[18] On June 23, Aguinaldo issued another decree, this time replacing the dictatorial government with a revolutionary government (and naming himself as President).[19][20]

text: Writing retrospectively in 1899, Aguinaldo claimed that an American naval officer had urged him to return to the Philippines to fight the Spanish and said "The United States is a great and rich nation and needs no colonies."[21] Aguinaldo also wrote that after checking with Dewey by telegraph, U.S. Consul E. Spencer Pratt had assured him in Singapore: "That the United States would at least recognize the independence of the Philippines under the protection of the United States Navy. The consul added that there was no necessity for entering into a formal written agreement because the word of the Admiral and of the United States Consul were in fact equivalent to the most solemn pledge that their verbal promises and assurance would be fulfilled to the letter and were not to be classed with Spanish promises or Spanish ideas of a man’s word of honour."[21] Aguinaldo received nothing in writing.

text: On April 28 Pratt wrote to United States Secretary of State William R. Day, explaining the details of his meeting with Aguinaldo:

text:
“

"At this interview, after learning from General Aguinaldo the state of an object sought to be obtained by the present insurrectionary movement, which, though absent from the Philippines, he was still directing, I took it upon myself, whilst explaining that I had no authority to speak for the Government, to point out the danger of continuing independent action at this stage; and, having convinced him of the expediency of cooperating with our fleet, then at Hongkong, and obtained the assurance of his willingness to proceed thither and confer with Commodore Dewey to that end, should the latter so desire, I telegraphed the Commodore the same day as follows, through our consul-general at Hongkong:--[22]

”

text: There was no mention in the cablegrams between Pratt and Dewey of independence or indeed of any conditions on which Aguinaldo was to cooperate, these details being left for future arrangement with Dewey. Pratt had intended to facilitate the occupation and administration of the Philippines, and also to prevent a possible conflict of action. In a communication written on July 28, Pratt made the following statement:

text:
“

"I declined even to discuss with General Aguinaldo the question of the future policy of the United States with regard to the Philippines, that I held out no hopes to him of any kind, committed the government in no way whatever, and, in the course of our confidences, never acted upon the assumption that the Government would cooperate with him--General Aguinaldo--for the furtherance of any plans of his own, nor that, in accepting his said cooperation, it would consider itself pledged to recognize any political claims which he might put forward."[23]

”

text: On June 16, Secretary Day cabled Consul Pratt: "Avoid unauthorized negotiations with the Philippine insurgents," and later on the same day:[24]

text:
“

The Department observes that you informed General Aguinaldo that you had no authority to speak for the United States; and, in the absence of the fuller report which you promise, it is assumed that you did not attempt to commit this Government to any alliance with the Philippine insurgents. To obtain the unconditional personal assistance of General Aguinaldo in the expedition to Manila was proper, if in so doing he was not induced to form hopes which it might not be practicable to gratify. This Government has known the Philippine insurgents only as discontented and rebellious subjects of Spain, and is not acquainted with their purposes. While their contest with that power has been a matter of public notoriety, they have neither asked nor received from this Government any recognition. The United States, in entering upon the occupation of the islands, as the result of its military operations in that quarter, will do so in the exercise of the rights which the state of war confers, and will expect from the inhabitants, without regard to their former attitude toward the Spanish Government, that obedience which will be lawfully due from them.
If, in the course of your conferences with General Aguinaldo, you acted upon the assumption that this Government would co-operate with him for the furtherance of any plan of his own, or that, in accepting his co-operation, it would consider itself pledged to recognize any political claims which he may put forward, your action was unauthorized and can not be approved.

”

text: Filipino scholar Maximo Kalaw wrote in 1927: "A few of the principal facts, however, seem quite clear. Aguinaldo was not made to understand that, in consideration of Filipino cooperation, the United States would extend its sovereignty over the Islands, and thus in place of the old Spanish master a new one would step in. The truth was that nobody at the time ever thought that the end of the war would result in the retention of the Philippines by the United States."[25]

text: Tensions between U.S. and revolutionary forces[edit]

text: On July 9 General Anderson informed Major General Henry Clark Corbin, the Adjutant General of the U.S. Army, that Aguinaldo "has declared himself Dictator and President, and is trying to take Manila without our assistance", opining that that would not be probable but, if done, would allow him to antagonize any U.S. attempt to establish a provisional government.[26] On July 15, Aguinaldo issued three organic decrees assuming civil authority of the Philippines.[27]

text: On July 18, General Anderson wrote that he suspected Aguinaldo to be secretly negotiating with the Spanish authorities.[26] In a 21 July letter to the Adjutant General, General Anderson wrote that Aguinaldo had "put in operation an elaborate system of military government, under his assumed authority as Dictator, and has prohibited any supplies being given us, except by his order," and that Anderson had written to Aguinaldo that the requisitions on the country for necessary items must be filled, and that he must aid in having them filled.[28]

text: On July 24, Aguinaldo wrote a letter to General Anderson in effect warning him not to disembark American troops in places conquered by the Filipinos from the Spaniards without first communicating in writing the places to be occupied and the object of the occupation. Murat Halstead, official historian of the Philippine Expedition, writes that General Merritt remarked shortly after his arrival on 25 June, "As General Aguinaldo did not visit me on my arrival, nor offer his services as a subordinate military leader, and as my instructions from the President fully contemplated the occupation of the islands by the American land forces, and stated that 'the powers of the military occupant are absolute and supreme and immediately operate upon the political condition of the inhabitants,' I did not consider it wise to hold any direct communication with the insurgent leader until I should be in possession of the city of Manila, especially as I would not until then be in a position to issue a proclamation and enforce my authority, in the event that his pretensions should clash with my designs."[29]

text: U.S. commanders suspected that Aguinaldo and his forces were informing the Spanish of American movements. U.S. Army Major John R. M. Taylor later wrote, after translating and analyzing insurgent documents, "The officers of the United States Army who believed that the insurgents were informing the Spaniards of the American movements were right. Sastrón has printed a letter from Pío del Pilar, dated July 30, to the Spanish officer commanding at Santa Ana, in which Pilar said that Aguinaldo had told him that the Americans would attack the Spanish lines on August 2 and advised that the Spaniards should not give way, but hold their positions. Pilar added, however, that if the Spaniards should fall back on the walled city and surrender Santa Ana to himself, he would hold it with his own men. Aguinaldo's information was correct, and on August 2 eight American soldiers were killed or wounded by the Spanish fire."[30]

text: On the evening of August 12, on orders of General Merritt, General Anderson notified Aguinaldo to forbid the insurgents under his command from entering Manila. On 13 August, unaware of the peace protocol signing, U.S. forces assaulted and captured the Spanish positions in Manila. Insurgents made an independent attack of their own, as planned, which promptly led to trouble with the Americans. At 0800 that morning, Aguinaldo received a telegram from General Anderson, sternly warning him not to let his troops enter Manila without the consent of the American commander, who was situated on the south side of the Pasig River. General Anderson's request was ignored, and Aguinaldo's forces crowded forward alongside the American forces until they directly confronted the Spanish troops. Although the Spanish were waving a flag of truce, the insurgents fired on the Spanish forces, provoking return fire. 19 American soldiers were killed, and 103 more were wounded in this action.[31][32]

text: General Anderson sent Aguinaldo a telegram, later that day, which read:

text:
“

Dated Ermita Headquarters 2nd Division 13 to Gen. Aguinaldo. Commanding Filipino Forces.--Manila, taken. Serious trouble threatened between our forces. Try and prevent it. Your troops should not force themselves in the city until we have received the full surrender then we will negotiate with you. -Anderson, commanding.

”

text: Aguinaldo however demanded joint occupation of Manila. On August 13 Admiral Dewey and General Merritt informed their superiors of this and asked how far they might proceed in enforcing obedience in the matter.[33]

text: General Merritt received news of the August 12 peace protocol on August 16, three days after the surrender of Manila.[34] Admiral Dewey and General Merritt were informed by a telegram dated August 17 that the President of the United States had directed:

text:
“

That there must be no joint occupation with the Insurgents. The United States in the possession of Manila city, Manila bay and harbor must preserve the peace and protect persons and property within the territory occupied by their military and naval forces. The insurgents and all others must recognize the military occupation and authority of the United States and the cessation of hostilities proclaimed by the President. Use whatever means in your judgment are necessary to this end.[33]

”

text: Insurgent forces were looting the portions of the city which they occupied, and were not confining their attacks to Spaniards, but were assaulting their own people and raiding the property of foreigners as well.[citation needed] U.S. commanders pressed Aguinaldo to withdraw his forces from Manila. Negotiations proceeded slowly and, on August 31, General Elwell Otis (General Merritt being unavailable) wrote, in a long letter to Aguinaldo: "... I am compelled by my instructions to direct that your armed forces evacuate the entire city of Manila, including its suburbs and defences, and that I shall be obliged to take action with that end in view within a very short space of time should you decline to comply with my Government's demands; and I hereby serve notice on you that unless your troops are withdrawn beyond the line of the city's defences before Thursday, the 15th instant, I shall be obliged to resort to forcible action, and that my Government will hold you responsible for any unfortunate consequences which may ensue."[35] After further negotiation and exchanges of letters, Aguinaldo wrote on September 16: "On the evening of the 15th the armed insurgent organizations withdrew from the city and all of its suburbs, ..."[36]

text: Peace protocol between the U.S. and Spain[edit]

text: On August 12, 1898, The New York Times reported that a peace protocol had been signed in Washington that afternoon between the U.S. and Spain, suspending hostilities between the two nations.[37] The full text of the protocol was not made public until November 5, but Article III read: "The United States will occupy and hold the City, Bay, and Harbor of Manila, pending the conclusion of a treaty of peace, which shall determine the control, disposition, and government of the Philippines."[38][39] After conclusion of this agreement, U.S. President McKinley proclaimed a suspension of hostilities with Spain.[40]

text: Capture of Manila[edit]

text: By June, U.S. and Filipino forces had taken control of most of the islands, except for the walled city of Intramuros. Admiral Dewey and General Merritt were able to work out a bloodless solution with acting Governor-General Fermín Jáudenes. The negotiating parties made a secret agreement to stage a mock battle in which the Spanish forces would be defeated by the American forces, but the Filipino forces would not be allowed to enter the city. This plan minimized the risk of unnecessary casualties on all sides, while the Spanish would also avoid the shame of possibly having to surrender Intramuros to the Filipino forces.[41] On the eve of the mock battle, General Anderson telegraphed Aguinaldo, "Do not let your troops enter Manila without the permission of the American commander. On this side of the Pasig River you will be under fire".[42]

text: On August 13, with American commanders unaware that a ceasefire had already been signed between Spain and the U.S. on the previous day, American forces captured the city of Manila from the Spanish in the Battle of Manila.[43][44][45] The battle started when Dewey's ships bombarded Fort San Antonio Abad, a decrepit structure on the southern outskirts of Manila, and the virtually impregnable walls of Intramuros. In accordance with the plan, the Spanish forces withdrew while U.S. forces advanced. Once a sufficient show of battle had been made, Dewey hoisted the signal "D.W.H.B." (meaning "Do you surrender?),[46] whereupon the Spanish hoisted a white flag and Manila was formally surrendered to U.S. forces.[47]

text: This battle marked the end of Filipino-American collaboration, as the American action of preventing Filipino forces from entering the captured city of Manila was deeply resented by the Filipinos. This later led to the Philippine–American War,[48] which would prove to be more deadly and costly than the Spanish–American War.

text: U.S. military government[edit]

text: On August 14, 1898, two days after the capture of Manila, the U.S. established a military government in the Philippines, with General Merritt acting as military governor.[49] During military rule (1898–1902), the U.S. military commander governed the Philippines under the authority of the U.S. president as Commander-in-Chief of the United States Armed Forces. After the appointment of a civil Governor-General, the procedure developed that as parts of the country were pacified and placed firmly under American control, responsibility for the area would be passed to the civilian.

text: General Merritt was succeeded by General Otis as military governor, who in turn was succeeded by General MacArthur. Major General Adna Chaffee was the final military governor. The position of military governor was abolished in July 1902, after which the civil Governor-General became the sole executive authority in the Philippines.[50][51]

text: Under the military government, an American-style school system was introduced, initially with soldiers as teachers; civil and criminal courts were reestablished, including a supreme court;[52] and local governments were established in towns and provinces. The first local election was conducted by General Harold W. Lawton on May 7, 1899, in Baliuag, Bulacan.[53]

text: U.S. and insurgents clash[edit]

text: In a clash at Cavite between United States soldiers and insurgents on August 25, 1898, George Hudson of the Utah regiment was killed, Corporal William Anderson was mortally wounded, and four troopers of the Fourth Cavalry were slightly wounded.[54][55] This provoked General Anderson to send Aguinaldo a letter saying, "In order to avoid the very serious misfortune of an encounter between our troops, I demand your immediate withdrawal with your guard from Cavite. One of my men has been killed and three wounded by your people. This is positive and does not admit of explanation or delay."[55] Internal insurgent communications reported that the Americans were drunk at the time. Halstead writes that Aguinaldo expressed his regret and promised to punish the offenders.[54] In internal insurgent communications, Apolinario Mabini initially proposed to investigate and punish any offenders identified. Aguinaldo modified this, ordering, "... say that he was not killed by your soldiers, but by them themselves [the Americans] since they were drunk according to your telegram".[56] An insurgent officer in Cavite at the time reported on his record of services that he: "took part in the movement against the Americans on the afternoon of the 24th of August, under the orders of the commander of the troops and the adjutant of the post."[57]

text: Philippine elections, Malolos Congress, Constitutional government[edit]

text:
Elections were held by the Revolutionary Government between June and September 10, resulting in Emilio Aguinaldo being seated as President in the seating of a legislature known as the Malolos Congress. In a session between September 15 and November 13, 1898, the Malolos Constitution was adopted. It was promulgated on January 21, 1899,
creating the First Philippine Republic.[58]

text: Spanish–American War ends[edit]

text: Article V of the peace protocol signed on August 12 had mandated negotiations to conclude a treaty of peace to begin in Paris not later than October 1, 1898.[59] President McKinley sent a five-man commission, initially instructed to demand no more than Luzon, Guam, and Puerto Rico; which would have provided a limited U.S. empire of pinpoint colonies to support a global fleet and provide communication links.[60] In Paris, the commission was besieged with advice, particularly from American generals and European diplomats, to demand the entire Philippine archipelago.[60] The unanimous recommendation was that "it would certainly be cheaper and more humane to take the entire Philippines than to keep only part of it."[61] On October 28, 1898, McKinley wired the commission that "cessation of Luzon alone, leaving the rest of the islands subject to Spanish rule, or to be the subject of future contention, cannot be justified on political, commercial, or humanitarian grounds. The cessation must be the whole archipeligo or none. The latter is wholly inadmissible, and the former must therefore be required."[62] The Spanish negotiators were furious over the "immodist demands of a conqueror", but their wounded pride was assuaged by an offer of twenty million dollars for "Spanish improvements" to the islands. The Spaniards capitulated, and on December 10, 1898, the U.S. and Spain signed the Treaty of Paris, formally ending the Spanish–American War. In Article III, Spain ceded the Philippine archipelago to the United States, as follows: "Spain cedes to the United States the archipelago known as the Philippine Islands, and comprehending the islands lying within the following line: [... geographic description elided ...]. The United States will pay to Spain the sum of twenty million dollars ($20,000,000) within three months after the exchange of the ratifications of the present treaty."[63]

text: In the U.S., there was a movement for Philippine independence; some said that the U.S. had no right to a land where many of the people wanted self-government. In 1898 Andrew Carnegie, an industrialist and steel magnate, offered to pay the U.S. government $20 million to give the Philippines its independence.[64]

text: On November 7, 1900, Spain and the U.S. signed the Treaty of Washington, clarifying that the territories relinquished by Spain to the United States included any and all islands belonging to the Philippine Archipelago, but lying outside the lines described in the Treaty of Paris. That treaty explicitly named the islands of Cagayan Sulu and Sibutu and their dependencies as among the relinquished territories.[65]

text: Benevolent assimilation[edit]

text: U.S. President McKinley's December 21, 1898 proclamation of Benevolent Assimilation was announced in the Philippines on January 4, 1899. Referring to the Treaty of Paris, it said that as a result of the victories of American arms, the future control, disposition, and government of the Philippine Islands are ceded to the United States. It enjoined the military commander (General Otis) to make known to the inhabitants of the Philippine Islands that in succeeding to the sovereignty of Spain, the authority of the United States is to be exerted for the securing of the persons and property of the people of the islands and for the confirmation of all their private rights and relations. It specified that it will be the duty of the commander of the forces of occupation to announce and proclaim in the most public manner that we come, not as invaders or conquerors, but as friends, to protect the natives in their homes, in their employments, and in their personal and religious rights.[66] On January 6, 1899, General Otis was quoted in The New York Times as expressing himself as convinced that the U.S. government intends to seek the establishment of a liberal government, in which the people will be as fully represented as the maintenance of law and order will permit, susceptible of development, on lines of increased representation, and the bestowal of increased powers, into a government as free and independent as is enjoyed by the most favored provinces in the world.[67]

text: Philippine–American War (1899–1902)[edit]

text: Tensions escalate[edit]

text: The Spanish had yielded Iloilo to the insurgents in 1898 for the purpose of troubling the Americans. On January 1, 1899, news had come to Washington from Manila that American forces which had been sent to Iloilo under the command of General Marcus Miller had been confronted by 6,000 armed Filipinos, who refused them permission to land.[68][69] A Filipino official styling himself Presidente Lopez of the Federal Government of the Visayas informed Miller that "foreign troops" would not be landed "without express orders from the central government of Luzon"[69] On December 21, 1898, President McKinley issued a Proclamation of Benevolent Assimilation. General Otis delayed its publication until January 4, 1899, then publishing an amended version edited so as not to convey the meanings of the terms "sovereignty", "protection", and "right of cessation" which were present in the unabridged version.[70] Unknown to Otis, the War Department had also sent an enciphered copy of the Benevolent Assimilation proclamation to General Marcus Miller in Iloilo for informational purposes. Miller assumed that it was for distribution and, unaware that a politically bowdlerized version had been sent to Aguinaldo, published it in both Spanish and Tagalog translations which eventually made their way to Aguinaldo.[71] Even before Aguinaldo received the unaltered version and observed the changes in the copy he had received from Otis, he was upset that Otis had altered his own title to "Military Governor of the Philippines" from "... in the Philippines." Aguinaldo did not miss the significance of the alteration, which Otis had made without authorization from Washington.[72]

text: On January 5, Aguinaldo issued a counter-proclamation summarizing what he saw as American violations of the ethics of friendship, particularly as regards the events in Iloilo. The proclamation concluded as follows:

text:
“

Such procedures, so foreign to the dictates of culture and the usages observed by civilized nations, gave me the right to act without observing the usual rules of intercourse. Nevertheless, in order to be correct to the end, I sent to General Otis commissioners charged to solicit him to desist from his rash enterprise, but they were not listened to.
My government can not remain indifferent in view of such a violent and aggressive seizure of a portion of its territory by a nation which arrogated to itself the title champion of oppressed nations. Thus it is that my government is disposed to open hostilities if the American troops attempt to take forcible possession of the Visayan Islands. I denounce these acts before the world, in order that the conscience of mankind may pronounce its infallable verdict as to who are the true oppressors of nations and the tormentors of human kind.[73]

”

text: After some copies of that proclamation had been distributed, Aguinaldo ordered the recall of undistributed copies and issued another proclamation, which was published the same day in El Heraldo de la Revolucion, the official newspaper of the Philippine Republic. There, he said partly,

text:
“

As in General Otis's proclamation he alluded to some instructions edited by His Excellency the President of the United States, referring to the administration of the matters in the Philippine Islands, I in the name of God, the root and fountain of all justice, and that of all the right which has been visibly granted to me to direct my dear brothers in the difficult work of our regeneration, protest most solemnly against this intrusion of the United States Government on the sovereignty of these islands.
I equally protest in the name of the Filipino people against the said intrusion, because as they have granted their vote of confidence appointing me president of the nation, although I don't consider that I deserve such, therefore I consider it my duty to defend to death its liberty and independence.[74]

”

text: Otis, taking these two proclamations as a call to arms, strengthened American observation posts and alerted his troops. In the tense atmosphere, some 40,000 Filipinos fled Manila within a period of 15 days.[75]

text: Meanwhile, Felipe Agoncillo, who had been commissioned by the Philippine Revolutionary Government as Minister Plenipotentiary to negotiate treaties with foreign governments, and who had unsuccessfully sought to be seated at the negotiations between the U.S. and Spain in Paris, was now in Washington. On January 6, he filed a request for an interview with the President to discuss affairs in the Philippines. The next day the government officials were surprised to learn that messages to General Otis to deal mildly with the rebels and not to force a conflict had become known to Agoncillo, and cabled by him to Aguinaldo. At the same time came Aguinaldo's protest against General Otis signing himself "Military Governor of the Philippines."[68]

text: On January 8, Agoncillo gave out this statement:[68]

text:
“

In my opinion the Filipino people, whom I represent, will never consent to become a colony dependency of the United States. The soldiers of the Filipino army have pledged their lives that they will not lay down their arms until General Aguinaldo tells them to do so, and they will keep that pledge, I feel confident.

”

text: The Filipino committees in London, Paris and Madrid about this time telegraphed to President McKinley as follows:

text:
“

We protest against the disembarkation of American troops at Iloilo. The treaty of peace still unratified, the American claim to sovereignty is premature. Pray reconsider the resolution regarding Iloilo. Filipinos wish for the friendship of America and abhor militarism and deceit.[68]

”

text: On January 8, Aguinaldo received the following message from Teodoro Sandiko:

text:
“

To the President of the Revolutionary Government, Malolos, from Sandico, Manila. 8 Jan., 1899, 9.40 p.m..: In consequence of the order of General Rios to his officers, as soon as the Filipino attack begins the Americans should be driven into the Intramuros district and the walled city should be set on fire. Pipi.[76]

”

text: The New York Times reported on January 8, that two Americans who had been guarding a waterboat in Iloilo had been attacked, one fatally, and that insurgents were threatening to destroy the business section of the city by fire; and on January 10 that a peaceful solution to the Iloilo issues may result but that Aguinaldo had issued a proclamation threatening to drive the Americans from the islands.[77][78]

text: By January 10, insurgents were ready to assume the offensive, but desired, if possible, to provoke the Americans into firing the first shot. They made no secret of their desire for conflict, but increased their hostile demonstrations and pushed their lines forward into forbidden territory. Their attitude is well illustrated by the following extract from a telegram sent by Colonel Cailles to Aguinaldo on January 10, 1899:[79]

text:
“

Most urgent. An American interpreter has come to tell me to withdraw our forces in Maytubig fifty paces. I shall not draw back a step, and in place of withdrawing, I shall advance a little farther. He brings a letter from his general, in which he speaks to me as a friend. I said that from the day I knew that Maquinley (McKinley) opposed our independence I did not want any dealings with any American. War, war, is what we want. The Americans after this speech went off pale.

”

text: Aguinaldo approved the hostile attitude of Cailles, for there is a reply in his handwriting which reads:[79]

text:
“

I approve and applaud what you have done with the Americans, and zeal and valour always, also my beloved officers and soldiers there. I believe that they are playing us until the arrival of their reinforcements, but I shall send an ultimatum and remain always on the alert.--E. A. Jan. 10, 1899.

”

text: On 31 January 1899, The Minister of Interior of the revolutionary First Philippine Republic, Teodoro Sandiko, signed a decree saying that President Aguinaldo had directed that all idle lands be planted to provide food for the people, in view of impending war with the Americans.[80]

text: Outbreak of general hostilities[edit]

text: Worcester writes that General Otis' account of the opening of active hostilities was as follows:

text:
“

"On the night of February 2 they sent in a strong detachment to draw the fire of our outposts, which took up a position immediately in front and within a few yards of the same. The outpost was strengthened by a few of our men, who silently bore their taunts and abuse the entire night. This was reported to me by General MacArthur, whom I directed to communicate with the officer in command of the insurgent troops concerned. His prepared letter was shown me and approved, and the reply received was all that could be desired. However, the agreement was ignored by the insurgents and on the evening of February 4 another demonstration was made on one of our small outposts, which occupied a retired position at least 150 yards within the line which had been mutually agreed upon, an insurgent approaching the picket and refusing to halt or answer when challenged. The result was that our picket discharged his piece, when the insurgent troops near Santa Mesa opened a spirited fire on our troops there stationed.
"The insurgents had thus succeeded in drawing the fire of a small outpost, which they had evidently labored with all their ingenuity to accomplish, in order to justify in some way their premeditated attack. It is not believed that the chief insurgent leaders wished to open hostilities at this time, as they were not completely prepared to assume the initiative. They desired two or three days more to perfect their arrangements, but the zeal of their army brought on the crisis which anticipated their premeditated action. They could not have delayed long, however, for it was their object to force an issue before American troops, then en route, could arrive in Manila."
Thus began the Insurgent attack, so long and so carefully planned for. We learn from the Insurgent records that the shot of the American sentry missed its mark. There was no reason why it should have provoked a hot return fire, but it did.
The result of the ensuing combat was not at all what the Insurgents had anticipated. The Americans did not drive very well. It was but a short time before they themselves were routed and driven from their positions.
Aguinaldo of course promptly advanced the claim that his troops had been wantonly attacked. The plain fact is that the Insurgent patrol in question deliberately drew the fire of the American sentry, and this was just as much an act of war as was the firing of the shot. Whether the patrol was acting under proper orders from higher authority is not definitely known.[81]

”

text: Other sources name the two specific U.S. soldiers involved in the first exchange of fire as Privates William Grayson and Orville Miller of the Nebraska Volunteers.[82]

text: Subsequent to the conclusion of the war, after analyzing captured insurgent papers, Major Major J. R. M. Taylor wrote, in part,

text:
“

An attack on the United States forces was planned which should annihilate the little army in Manila, and delegations were appointed to secure the interference of foreign powers. The protecting cloak of pretense of friendliness to the United States was to be kept up until the last. While commissioners were appointed to negotiate with General Otis, secret societies were organized in Manila pledged to obey orders of the most barbarous character to kill and burn. The attack from without and the attack from within was to be on a set day and hour. The strained situation could not last. The spark was applied, either inadvertently or by design, on the 4th of February by an insurgent, willfully transgressing upon what, by their own admission, was within the agreed limits of the holding of the American troops. Hostilities resulted and the war was an accomplished fact.[83]

”

text: War[edit]

text: On February 4, Aguinaldo declared "That peace and friendly relations with the Americans be broken and that the latter be treated as enemies, within the limits prescribed by the laws of war."[84] On June 2, 1899, the Malolos Congress enacted and ratified a declaration of war on the United States, which was publicly proclaimed on that same day by Pedro Paterno, President of the Assembly.[85]

text: As before when fighting the Spanish, the Filipino rebels did not do well in the field. Aguinaldo and his provisional government escaped after the capture of Malolos on March 31, 1899 and were driven into northern Luzon. Peace feelers from members of Aguinaldo's cabinet failed in May when the American commander, General Ewell Otis, demanded an unconditional surrender. In 1901, Aguinaldo was captured and swore allegiance to the United States, marking one end to the war.

text: First Philippine Commission[edit]

text: President McKinley had appointed a five-person group headed by Dr. Jacob Schurman, president of Cornell University, on January 20, 1899, to investigate conditions in the islands and

text: make recommendations. The three civilian members of the Philippine Commission arrived in Manila on March 4, 1899, a month after the Battle of Manila which had begun armed conflict between U.S. and revolutionary Filipino forces. The commission published a proclamation containing assurances that the U.S. "... is anxious to establish in the Philippine Islands an enlightened system of government under which the Philippine people may enjoy the largest measure of home rule and the amplest liberty."

text: After meetings in April with revolutionary representatives, the commission requested authorization from McKinley to offer a specific plan. McKinley authorized an offer of a government consisting of "a Governor-General appointed by the President; cabinet appointed by the Governor-General; [and] a general advisory council elected by the people."[86] The Revolutionary Congress voted unanimously to cease fighting and accept peace and, on May 8, the revolutionary cabinet headed by Apolinario Mabini was replaced by a new "peace" cabinet headed by Pedro Paterno. At this point, General Antonio Luna arrested Paterno and most of his cabinet, returning Mabini and his cabinet to power. After this, the commission concluded that "... The Filipinos are wholly unprepared for independence ... there being no Philippine nation, but only a collection of different peoples."[87]

text: In the report that they issued to the president the following year, the commissioners acknowledged Filipino aspirations for independence; they declared, however, that the Philippines was not ready for it.[88]

text:
“

On November 2, 1899, The commission issued a preliminary report containing the following statement: Should our power by any fatality be withdrawn, the commission believe that the government of the Philippines would speedily lapse into anarchy, which would excuse, if it did not necessitate, the intervention of other powers and the eventual division of the islands among them. Only through American occupation, therefore, is the idea of a free, self-governing, and united Philippine commonwealth at all conceivable. And the indispensable need from the Filipino point of view of maintaining American sovereignty over the archipelago is recognized by all intelligent Filipinos and even by those insurgents who desire an American protectorate. The latter, it is true, would take the revenues and leave us the responsibilities. Nevertheless, they recognize the indubitable fact that the Filipinos cannot stand alone. Thus the welfare of the Filipinos coincides with the dictates of national honour in forbidding our abandonment of the archipelago. We cannot from any point of view escape the responsibilities of government which our sovereignty entails; and the commission is strongly persuaded that the performance of our national duty will prove the greatest blessing to the peoples of the Philippine Islands.[89][90]

”

text: Specific recommendations included the establishment of civilian government as rapidly as possible (the American chief executive in the islands at that time was the military governor), including establishment of a bicameral legislature, autonomous governments on the provincial and municipal levels, and a system of free public elementary schools.[91]

text: Second Philippine Commission[edit]

text: The Second Philippine Commission (the Taft Commission), appointed by McKinley on March 16, 1900, and headed by William Howard Taft, was granted legislative as well as limited executive powers.[92] On September 1, the Taft Commission began to exercise legislative functions.[93] Between September 1900 and August 1902, it issued 499 laws, established a judicial system, including a supreme court, drew up a legal code, and organized a civil service.[94] The 1901 municipal code provided for popularly elected presidents, vice presidents, and councilors to serve on municipal boards. The municipal board members were responsible for collecting taxes, maintaining municipal properties, and undertaking necessary construction projects; they also elected provincial governors.[91]

text: Establishment of civil government[edit]

text: On March 3, 1901 the U.S. Congress passed the Army Appropriation Act containing (along with the Platt Amendment on Cuba) the Spooner Amendment which provided the President with legislative authority to establish of a civil government in the Philippines.[95] Up until this time, the President been administering the Philippines by virtue of his war powers.[96] On July 1, 1901, civil government was inaugurated with William H. Taft as the Civil Governor. Later, on February 3, 1903, the U.S. Congress would change the title of Civil Governor to Governor-General.[97]

text: A highly centralized public school system was installed in 1901, using English as the medium of instruction. This created a heavy shortage of teachers, and the Philippine Commission authorized the Secretary of Public Instruction to bring to the Philippines 600 teachers from the U.S.A. — the so-called Thomasites. Free primary instruction that trained the people for the duties of citizenship and avocation was enforced by the Taft Commission per instructions of President McKinley.[98] Also, the Catholic Church was disestablished, and a considerable amount of church land was purchased and redistributed.

text: Official end to the war[edit]

text: The Philippine Organic Act of July 1902 approved, ratified, and confirmed McKinley's Executive Order establishing the Philippine Commission, and also stipulated that the bicameral Philippine Legislature would be established composed of an elected lower house, the Philippine Assembly and the appointed Philippine Commission as the upper house. The act also provided for extending the United States Bill of Rights to the Philippines.[91][99]

text: On July 2, 1902 the Secretary of War telegraphed that the insurrection against the sovereign authority of the U.S. having come to an end, and provincial civil governments having been established, the office of Military Governor was terminated.[51] On July 4, Theodore Roosevelt, who had succeeded to the U.S. Presidency after the assassination of President McKinley on September 5, 1901 proclaimed a full and complete pardon and amnesty to all persons in the Philippine archipelago who had participated in the conflict.[51][100]

text: On April 9, 2002, Philippine President Gloria Macapagal Arroyo proclaimed that the Philippine–American War had ended on April 16, 1902 with the surrender of General Miguel Malvar, and declared the centennial anniversary of that date as a national working holiday and as a special non-working holiday in the Province of Batangas and in the Cities of Batangas, Lipa and Tanaun.[101]

text: Post-1902 hostilities[edit]

text: Some sources have suggested that the war unofficially continued for nearly a decade, since bands of guerrillas, quasi-religious armed groups and other resistance groups continued to roam the countryside, still clashing with American Army or Philippine Constabulary patrols. American troops and the Philippine Constabulary continued hostilities against such resistance groups until 1913.[102] Some historians consider these unofficial extensions to be part of the war.[103]

text: Insular Government (1901–35)[edit]

text: The 1902 Philippine Organic Act was a constitution for the Insular Government, as the U.S. civil administration was known. This was a form of territorial government that reported to the Bureau of Insular Affairs. The act provided for a Governor-General appointed by the U.S. president and an elected lower house, the Philippine Assembly. It also disestablished the Catholic Church as the state religion. The United States government, in an effort to resolve the status of the friars, negotiated with the Vatican. The church agreed to sell the friars' estates and promised gradual substitution of Filipino and other non-Spanish priests for the friars. It refused, however, to withdraw the religious orders from the islands immediately, partly to avoid offending Spain. In 1904 the administration bought for $7.2 million the major part of the friars' holdings, amounting to some 166,000 hectares (410,000 acres), of which one-half was in the vicinity of Manila. The land was eventually resold to Filipinos, some of them tenants but the majority of them estate owners.[91]

text: In socio-economic terms, the Philippines made solid progress in this period. Foreign trade had amounted to 62 million pesos in 1895, 13% of which was with the United States. By 1920, it had increased to 601 million pesos, 66% of which was with the United States.[104] A health care system was established which, by 1930, reduced the mortality rate from all causes, including various tropical diseases, to a level similar to that of the United States itself. The practices of slavery, piracy and headhunting were suppressed but not entirely extinguished.

text: Two years after completion and publication of a census, a general election was conducted for the choice of delegates to a popular assembly. An elected Philippine Assembly was convened in 1907 as the lower house of a bicameral legislature, with the Philippine Commission as the upper house.

text: Every year from 1907 the Philippine Assembly and later the Philippine Legislature passed resolutions expressing the Filipino desire for independence.

text: Philippine nationalists led by Manuel L. Quezon and Sergio Osmeña enthusiastically endorsed the draft Jones Bill of 1912, which provided for Philippine independence after eight years, but later changed their views, opting for a bill which focused less on time than on the conditions of independence. The nationalists demanded complete and absolute independence to be guaranteed by the United States, since they feared that too-rapid independence from American rule without such guarantees might cause the Philippines to fall into Japanese hands. The Jones Bill was rewritten and passed Congress in 1916 with a later date of independence.[105]

text: The law, officially the Philippine Autonomy Act but popularly known as the Jones Law, served as the new organic act (or constitution) for the Philippines. Its preamble stated that the eventual independence of the Philippines would be American policy, subject to the establishment of a stable government. The law maintained the Governor-General of the Philippines, appointed by the President of the United States, but established a bicameral Philippine Legislature to replace the elected Philippine Assembly (lower house); it replaced the appointive Philippine Commission (upper house) with an elected senate.[106]

text: The Filipinos suspended their independence campaign during the First World War and supported the United States against Germany. After the war they resumed their independence drive with great vigor.[107] On March 17, 1919, the Philippine Legislature passed a "Declaration of Purposes", which stated the inflexible desire of the Filipino people to be free and sovereign. A Commission of Independence was created to study ways and means of attaining liberation ideal. This commission recommended the sending of an independence mission to the United States.[108] The "Declaration of Purposes" referred to the Jones Law as a veritable pact, or covenant, between the American and Filipino peoples whereby the United States promised to recognize the independence of the Philippines as soon as a stable government should be established. U.S. Governor-General of the Philippines Francis Burton Harrison had concurred in the report of the Philippine legislature as to a stable government.

text: The Philippine legislature funded an independence mission to the U.S. in 1919. The mission departed Manila on February 28 and met in the U.S. with and presented their case to Secretary of War Newton D. Baker.[109] U.S. President Woodrow Wilson, in his 1921 farewell message to Congress, certified that the Filipino people had performed the condition imposed on them as a prerequisite to independence, declaring that, this having been done, the duty of the U.S. is to grant Philippine independence.[110] The Republican Party then controlled Congress and the recommendation of the outgoing Democratic president was not heeded.[109]

text: After the first independence mission, public funding of such missions was ruled illegal. Subsequent independence missions in 1922, 1923, 1930, 1931 1932, and two missions in 1933 were funded by voluntary contributions. Numerous independence bills were submitted to the U.S. Congress, which passed the Hare-Hawes-Cutting Bill on December 30, 1932. U.S. President Herbert Hoover vetoed the bill on January 13, 1933. Congress overrode the veto on January 17, and the Hare–Hawes–Cutting Act became U.S. law. The law promised Philippine independence after 10 years, but reserved several military and naval bases for the United States, as well as imposing tariffs and quotas on Philippine exports. The law also required the Philippine Senate to ratify the law. Manuel L. Quezon urged the Philippine Senate to reject the bill, which it did. Quezon himself led the twelfth independence mission to Washington to secure a better independence act. The result was the Tydings–McDuffie Act of 1934 which was very similar to the Hare-Hawes-Cutting Act except in minor details. The Tydings-McDuffie Act was ratified by the Philippine Senate. The law provided for the granting of Philippine independence by 1946.[111]

text: The Tydings–McDuffie Act provided for the drafting and guidelines of a Constitution, for a 10-year "transitional period" as the Commonwealth of the Philippines before the granting of Philippine independence. On May 5, 1934, the Philippines legislature passed an act setting the election of convention delegates. Governor-General Frank Murphy designated July 10 as the election date, and the convention held its inaugural session on July 30. The completed draft constitution was approved by the convention on February 8, 1935, approved by U.S. President Franklin Roosevelt on March 23, and ratified by popular vote on May 14. The first election under the constitution was held on September 17, and on November 15, 1935, the Commonwealth was put into place.[112]

text: Commonwealth era (1935–1946)[edit]

text: It was planned that the period 1935–1946 would be devoted to the final adjustments required for a peaceful transition to full independence, a great latitude in autonomy being granted in the meantime. Instead there was war with Japan.[113]

text: On May 14, 1935, an election to fill the newly created office of President of the Commonwealth of the Philippines was won by Manuel L. Quezon (Nacionalista Party) and a Filipino government was formed on the basis of principles superficially similar to the U.S. Constitution. The Commonwealth as established in 1935 featured a very strong executive, a unicameral national assembly, and a supreme court composed entirely of Filipinos for the first time since 1901. The new government embarked on an ambitious agenda of establishing the basis for national defense, greater control over the economy, reforms in education, improvement of transport, the colonization of the island of Mindanao, and the promotion of local capital and industrialization. The Commonwealth however, was also faced with agrarian unrest, an uncertain diplomatic and military situation in South East Asia, and uncertainty about the level of United States commitment to the future Republic of the Philippines.

text: In 1939–40, the Philippine Constitution was amended to restore a bicameral Congress, and permit the reelection of President Quezon, previously restricted to a single, six-year term.

text: During the Commonwealth years, Philippines sent one elected Resident Commissioner to the United States House of Representatives, as Puerto Rico currently does today.

text: Japanese occupation and World War II (1941–45)[edit]

text: A few hours after the Japanese attack on Pearl Harbor on December 7, 1941, the Japanese launched air raids in several cities and US military installations in the Philippines on December 8, and on December 10, the first Japanese troops landed in Northern Luzon. Filipino pilot Captain Jesús A. Villamor, leading a flight of three P-26 "Peashooter" fighters of the 6th Pursuit Squadron, distinguished himself by attacking two enemy formations of 27 planes each and downing a much-superior Japanese Zero, for which he was awarded the U.S. Distinguished Service Cross. The two other planes in that flight, flown by Lieutenants César Basa and Geronimo Aclan, were shot down.[114]

text: General Douglas MacArthur, commander of the United States Armed Forces in the Far East (USAFFE), was forced to retreat to Bataan. Manila was occupied by the Japanese on January 2, 1942. The fall of Bataan was on April 9, 1942 with Corregidor Island, at the mouth of Manila Bay, surrendering on May 6.[115]

text: The Commonwealth government by then had exiled itself to Washington, DC, upon the invitation of President Roosevelt; however many politicians stayed behind and collaborated with the occupying Japanese. The Philippine Commonwealth Army continued to fight the Japanese in a guerrilla war and were considered auxiliary units of the United States Army. Several Philippine Commonwealth military awards, such as the Philippine Defense Medal, Independence Medal, and Liberation Medal, were awarded to both the United States and Philippine Armed Forces.

text: As the Japanese forces advanced, Manila was declared an open city to prevent it from destruction, meanwhile, the government was moved to Corregidor. In March 1942, General MacArthur and President Quezon fled the country. Guerrilla units harassed the Japanese when they could, and on Luzon native resistance was strong enough that the Japanese never did get control of a large part of the island. The Hukbalahap, a communist guerilla movement formed by peasant farmers in Central Luzon, did most of the fighting. The Hukbalahap, also known as Huks, resisted invaders and punished the people who collaborated with the Japanese, but did not have a well-disciplined organization, and were later seen as a threat to the Manila government.[116] Before MacArthur came back, the effectiveness of the guerilla movement had decimated Japanese control, limiting it to only 12 out of the 48 provinces.

text: In October 1944, MacArthur had gathered enough additional troops and supplies to begin the retaking of the Philippines, landing with Sergio Osmeña who had assumed the Presidency after Quezon's death. The Philippine Constabulary went on active service under the Philippine Commonwealth Army on October 28, 1944 during liberation under the Commonwealth regime. The battles entailed long fierce fighting; some of the Japanese continued to fight until the official surrender of the Empire of Japan on September 2, 1945.[117]

text: After their landing, Filipino and American forces also undertook measures to suppress the Huk movement, which was founded to fight the Japanese Occupation. The Filipino and American forces removed local Huk governments and imprisoned many high-ranking members of the Philippine Communist Party. While these incidents happened, there was still fighting against the Japanese forces and, despite the American and Philippine measures against the Huk, they still supported American and Filipino soldiers in the fight against the Japanese.

text: Over a million Filipinos (including regular and constable soldiers, recognized guerrillas and non-combatant civilians) had been killed in the war.  The 1947 final report of the  High Commissioner to the Philippines documents massive damage to most coconut mills and sugar mills;  inter-island  shipping had all been destroyed or removed; concrete highways had been broken up for use on military airports; railways were inoperative; Manila was 80 percent destroyed, Cebu 90 percent, and Zamboanga 95 percent. [118]

text: Independence (1946)[edit]

text: Philippine independence came on July 4, 1946, with the signing of the Treaty of Manila between the governments of the United States and the Philippines. The treaty provided for the recognition of the independence of the Republic of the Philippines and the relinquishment of American sovereignty over the Philippine Islands.[119] From 1946 to 1961, Independence Day was observed on July 4. On 12 May 1962, President Macapagal issued Presidential Proclamation No. 28, proclaiming Tuesday, June 12, 1962 as a special public holiday throughout the Philippines.[120][121] In 1964, Republic Act No. 4166 changed the date of Independence Day from July 4 to June 12 and renamed the July 4 holiday as Philippine Republic Day.[122]

text: World War II veteran benefits[edit]

text: During World War II, over 200,000 Filipinos fought in defense of the United States against the Japanese in the Pacific theater of military operations, where more than half died. As a commonwealth of the United States before and during the war, Filipinos were legally American nationals. With American nationality, Filipinos were promised all the benefits afforded to those serving in the armed forces of the United States.[123] In 1946, Congress passed the Rescission Act (38 U.S.C. § 107) which stripped Filipinos of the benefits they were promised.[123]

text: Since the passage of the Rescission Act, many Filipino veterans have traveled to the United States to lobby Congress for the benefits promised to them for their service and sacrifice. Over 30,000 of such veterans live in the United States today, with most being United States citizens. Sociologists introduced the phrase "Second Class Veterans" to describe the plight of these Filipino Americans. Beginning in 1993, numerous bills titled Filipino Veterans Fairness Act were introduced in Congress to return the benefits taken away from these veterans, only to die in committee. The American Recovery and Reinvestment Act of 2009, signed into law on February 17, 2009, included provisions to pay benefits to the 15,000 remaining veterans.[124]

text: On January 6, 2011 Jackie Speier (D-CA), U.S. Representative for California's 12th congressional district, serving since 2008, introduced a bill seeking to make Filipino WW-II veterans eligible for the same benefits available to U.S. veterans. In a news conference to outline the bill, Speier estimated that approximately 50,000 Filipino veterans survive.[125][126]


document_title: Major League Baseball Most Valuable Player Award

question_text: who won the mvp in the american league

question_tokens: who won the mvp in the american league

root

text: Chalmers Award (1911–1914)[edit]

text: Before the 1910 season, Hugh Chalmers of Chalmers Automobile announced he would present a Chalmers Model 30 automobile to the player with the highest batting average in Major League Baseball at the end of the season. The 1910 race for best average in the American League was between the Detroit Tigers' widely disliked[3][15][16] Ty Cobb and Nap Lajoie of the Cleveland Indians. On the last day of the season, Lajoie overtook Cobb's batting average with seven bunt hits against the St. Louis Browns. American League President Ban Johnson said a recalculation showed that Cobb had won the race anyway, and Chalmers ended up awarding cars to both players.[3]

tag: p

text: The following season, Chalmers created the Chalmers Award. A committee of baseball writers were to convene after the season to determine the "most important and useful player to the club and to the league". Since the award was not as effective at advertising as Chalmers had hoped, it was discontinued after 1914.[3]

text:
Year

American League winner

Team

Position

National League winner

Team

Position

Ref

1911

Ty Cobb§

Detroit Tigers
OF

Frank Schulte

Chicago Cubs
OF
[17]

1912

Tris Speaker

Boston Red Sox
OF

Larry Doyle

New York Giants
2B
[18]

1913

Walter Johnson

Washington Senators
RHP

Jake Daubert

Brooklyn Dodgers
1B
[19]

1914

Eddie Collins

Philadelphia Athletics
2B

Johnny Evers

Boston Braves
2B
[20]

tag: table

text: League Awards (1922–1929)[edit]

text: In 1922 the American League created a new award to honor "the baseball player who is of the greatest all-around service to his club".[21] Winners, voted on by a committee of eight baseball writers chaired by James Crusinberry,[22] received a bronze medal and a cash prize.[23] Voters were required to select one player from each team and player-coaches and prior award winners were ineligible. Famously, these criteria resulted in Babe Ruth winning only a single MVP award before it was dropped after 1928. The National League award, without these restrictions, lasted from 1924 to 1929.[3]

text:
Year

American League winner

Team

Position

National League winner

Team

Position

Ref

1922

George Sisler

St. Louis Browns
1B

—

—
—
[24]

1923

Babe Ruth§

New York Yankees
OF

—

—
—
[25]

1924

Walter Johnson (2)

Washington Senators
RHP

Dazzy Vance

Brooklyn Robins
RHP
[26]

1925

Roger Peckinpaugh

Washington Senators
SS

Rogers Hornsby

St. Louis Cardinals
2B
[27]

1926

George Burns

Cleveland Indians
1B

Bob O'Farrell

St. Louis Cardinals
C
[28]

1927

Lou Gehrig

New York Yankees
1B

Paul Waner

Pittsburgh Pirates
OF
[29]

1928

Mickey Cochrane

Philadelphia Athletics
C

Jim Bottomley

St. Louis Cardinals
1B
[30]

1929

—

—
—

Rogers Hornsby (2)

Chicago Cubs
2B
[31]

text: Baseball Writers' Association of America's Most Valuable Player (1931–present)[edit]

text: The BBWAA first awarded the modern MVP after the 1931 season, adopting the format the National League used to distribute its league award. One writer in each city with a team filled out a ten-place ballot, with ten points for the recipient of a first-place vote, nine for a second-place vote, and so on. In 1938, the BBWAA raised the number of voters to three per city and gave 14 points for a first-place vote. The only significant change since then occurred in 1961, when the number of voters was reduced to two per league city.[3]

text:
Year
American League winner
Team
Position
National League winner
Team
Position
Ref

1931
Lefty Grove†
Philadelphia Athletics*
LHP
Frankie Frisch†
St. Louis Cardinals*
2B
[32]

1932
Jimmie Foxx†
Philadelphia Athletics
1B
Chuck Klein†
Philadelphia Phillies
OF
[33]

1933
Jimmie Foxx† (2)
Philadelphia Athletics
1B
Carl Hubbell†
New York Giants*
LHP
[34]

1934
Mickey Cochrane† (2)
Detroit Tigers*
C
Dizzy Dean†
St. Louis Cardinals*
RHP
[35]

1935
Hank Greenberg†§
Detroit Tigers*
1B
Gabby Hartnett†
Chicago Cubs*
C
[36]

1936
Lou Gehrig† (2)
New York Yankees*
1B
Carl Hubbell†§ (2)
New York Giants*
LHP
[37]

1937
Charlie Gehringer†
Detroit Tigers
2B
Joe Medwick†
St. Louis Cardinals
OF
[38]

1938
Jimmie Foxx† (3)
Boston Red Sox
1B
Ernie Lombardi†
Cincinnati Reds
C
[39]

1939
Joe DiMaggio†
New York Yankees*
OF
Bucky Walters
Cincinnati Reds*
RHP
[40]

1940
Hank Greenberg† (2)
Detroit Tigers*
OF
Frank McCormick
Cincinnati Reds*
1B
[41]

1941
Joe DiMaggio† (2)
New York Yankees*
OF
Dolph Camilli
Brooklyn Dodgers*
1B
[42]

1942
Joe Gordon†
New York Yankees*
2B
Mort Cooper
St. Louis Cardinals*
RHP
[43]

1943
Spud Chandler
New York Yankees*
RHP
Stan Musial†
St. Louis Cardinals*
OF
[44]

1944
Hal Newhouser†
Detroit Tigers
LHP
Marty Marion
St. Louis Cardinals*
SS
[45]

1945
Hal Newhouser† (2)
Detroit Tigers*
LHP
Phil Cavarretta
Chicago Cubs*
1B
[46]

1946
Ted Williams†
Boston Red Sox*
OF
Stan Musial† (2)
St. Louis Cardinals*
1B
[47]

1947
Joe DiMaggio† (3)
New York Yankees*
OF
Bob Elliott
Boston Braves
3B
[48]

1948
Lou Boudreau†
Cleveland Indians*
SS
Stan Musial† (3)
St. Louis Cardinals
OF
[49]

1949
Ted Williams† (2)
Boston Red Sox
OF
Jackie Robinson†
Brooklyn Dodgers*
2B
[50]

1950
Phil Rizzuto†
New York Yankees*
SS
Jim Konstanty
Philadelphia Phillies*
RHP
[51]

1951
Yogi Berra†
New York Yankees*
C
Roy Campanella†
Brooklyn Dodgers
C
[52]

1952
Bobby Shantz
Philadelphia Athletics
LHP
Hank Sauer
Chicago Cubs
OF
[53]

1953
Al Rosen§
Cleveland Indians
3B
Roy Campanella† (2)
Brooklyn Dodgers*
C
[54]

1954
Yogi Berra† (2)
New York Yankees
C
Willie Mays†
New York Giants*
OF
[55]

1955
Yogi Berra† (3)
New York Yankees*
C
Roy Campanella† (3)
Brooklyn Dodgers*
C
[56]

1956
Mickey Mantle†§
New York Yankees*
OF
Don Newcombe
Brooklyn Dodgers*
RHP
[57]

1957
Mickey Mantle† (2)
New York Yankees*
OF
Hank Aaron†
Milwaukee Braves*
OF
[58]

1958
Jackie Jensen
Boston Red Sox
OF
Ernie Banks†
Chicago Cubs
SS
[59]

1959
Nellie Fox†
Chicago White Sox*
2B
Ernie Banks† (2)
Chicago Cubs
SS
[60]

1960
Roger Maris
New York Yankees*
OF
Dick Groat
Pittsburgh Pirates*
SS
[61]

1961
Roger Maris (2)
New York Yankees*
OF
Frank Robinson†
Cincinnati Reds*
OF
[62]

1962
Mickey Mantle† (3)
New York Yankees*
OF
Maury Wills
Los Angeles Dodgers
SS
[63]

1963
Elston Howard
New York Yankees*
C
Sandy Koufax†
Los Angeles Dodgers*
LHP
[64]

1964
Brooks Robinson†
Baltimore Orioles
3B
Ken Boyer
St. Louis Cardinals*
3B
[65]

1965
Zoilo Versalles
Minnesota Twins*
SS
Willie Mays† (2)
San Francisco Giants
OF
[66]

1966
Frank Robinson†§ (2)
Baltimore Orioles*
OF
Roberto Clemente†
Pittsburgh Pirates
OF
[67]

1967
Carl Yastrzemski†
Boston Red Sox*
OF
Orlando Cepeda†§
St. Louis Cardinals*
1B
[68]

1968
Denny McLain§
Detroit Tigers*
RHP
Bob Gibson†
St. Louis Cardinals*
RHP
[69]

1969
Harmon Killebrew†
Minnesota Twins
3B
Willie McCovey†
San Francisco Giants
1B
[70]

1970
Boog Powell
Baltimore Orioles*
1B
Johnny Bench†
Cincinnati Reds*
C
[71]

1971
Vida Blue
Oakland Athletics
LHP
Joe Torre†[c]
St. Louis Cardinals
3B
[72]

1972
Dick Allen
Chicago White Sox
1B
Johnny Bench† (2)
Cincinnati Reds*
C
[73]

1973
Reggie Jackson†§
Oakland Athletics*
OF
Pete Rose
Cincinnati Reds
OF
[74]

1974
Jeff Burroughs
Texas Rangers
OF
Steve Garvey
Los Angeles Dodgers*
1B
[75]

1975
Fred Lynn
Boston Red Sox*
OF
Joe Morgan†
Cincinnati Reds*
2B
[76]

1976
Thurman Munson
New York Yankees*
C
Joe Morgan† (2)
Cincinnati Reds*
2B
[77]

1977
Rod Carew†
Minnesota Twins
1B
George Foster
Cincinnati Reds
OF
[78]

1978
Jim Rice†
Boston Red Sox
OF
Dave Parker
Pittsburgh Pirates
OF
[79]

1979
Don Baylor
California Angels
LF/DH [80]
Keith Hernandez[d]
St. Louis Cardinals
1B
[12]

Willie Stargell†[d]
Pittsburgh Pirates*
1B

1980
George Brett†
Kansas City Royals*
3B
Mike Schmidt†§
Philadelphia Phillies*
3B
[81]

1981
Rollie Fingers†
Milwaukee Brewers
RHP
Mike Schmidt† (2)
Philadelphia Phillies
3B
[82]

1982
Robin Yount†
Milwaukee Brewers*
SS
Dale Murphy
Atlanta Braves
OF
[83]

1983
Cal Ripken, Jr.†
Baltimore Orioles*
SS
Dale Murphy (2)
Atlanta Braves
OF
[84]

1984
Willie Hernández
Detroit Tigers*
LHP
Ryne Sandberg†
Chicago Cubs
2B
[85]

1985
Don Mattingly
New York Yankees
1B
Willie McGee
St. Louis Cardinals*
OF
[86]

1986
Roger Clemens
Boston Red Sox*
RHP
Mike Schmidt† (3)
Philadelphia Phillies
3B
[87]

1987
George Bell
Toronto Blue Jays
OF
Andre Dawson†
Chicago Cubs
OF
[88]

1988
Jose Canseco§
Oakland Athletics*
OF
Kirk Gibson
Los Angeles Dodgers*
OF
[89]

1989
Robin Yount† (2)
Milwaukee Brewers
OF
Kevin Mitchell
San Francisco Giants*
OF
[90]

1990
Rickey Henderson†
Oakland Athletics*
OF
Barry Bonds
Pittsburgh Pirates
OF
[91]

1991
Cal Ripken, Jr.† (2)
Baltimore Orioles
SS
Terry Pendleton
Atlanta Braves*
3B
[92]

1992
Dennis Eckersley†
Oakland Athletics
RHP
Barry Bonds (2)
Pittsburgh Pirates
OF
[93]

1993
Frank Thomas†§
Chicago White Sox
1B
Barry Bonds (3)
San Francisco Giants
OF
[94]

1994
Frank Thomas† (2)
Chicago White Sox
1B
Jeff Bagwell†§
Houston Astros
1B
[95]

1995
Mo Vaughn
Boston Red Sox
1B
Barry Larkin†
Cincinnati Reds
SS
[96]

1996
Juan González
Texas Rangers
OF
Ken Caminiti§
San Diego Padres
3B
[97]

1997
Ken Griffey, Jr.†§
Seattle Mariners
OF
Larry Walker
Colorado Rockies
OF
[98]

1998
Juan González (2)
Texas Rangers
OF
Sammy Sosa
Chicago Cubs
OF
[99]

1999
Iván Rodríguez†
Texas Rangers
C
Chipper Jones†
Atlanta Braves*
3B
[100]

2000
Jason Giambi
Oakland Athletics
1B
Jeff Kent
San Francisco Giants
2B
[101]

2001
Ichiro Suzuki
Seattle Mariners
OF
Barry Bonds (4)
San Francisco Giants
OF
[102][103]

2002
Miguel Tejada
Oakland Athletics
SS
Barry Bonds§ (5)
San Francisco Giants*
OF
[104]

2003
Alex Rodriguez
Texas Rangers
SS
Barry Bonds (6)
San Francisco Giants
OF
[105]

2004
Vladimir Guerrero†
Anaheim Angels
OF
Barry Bonds (7)
San Francisco Giants
OF
[106]

2005
Alex Rodriguez (2)
New York Yankees
3B
Albert Pujols^
St. Louis Cardinals
1B
[107]

2006
Justin Morneau
Minnesota Twins
1B
Ryan Howard
Philadelphia Phillies
1B
[108]

2007
Alex Rodriguez (3)
New York Yankees
3B
Jimmy Rollins
Philadelphia Phillies
SS
[109]

2008
Dustin Pedroia^
Boston Red Sox
2B
Albert Pujols^ (2)
St. Louis Cardinals
1B
[110]

2009
Joe Mauer^
Minnesota Twins
C
Albert Pujols^§ (3)
St. Louis Cardinals
1B
[103][111]

2010
Josh Hamilton^
Texas Rangers*
OF
Joey Votto^
Cincinnati Reds
1B
[112][113]

2011
Justin Verlander^
Detroit Tigers
RHP
Ryan Braun^
Milwaukee Brewers
OF
[114][115]

2012
Miguel Cabrera^
Detroit Tigers*
3B
Buster  Posey^
San Francisco Giants*
C
[116][117]

2013
Miguel Cabrera^ (2)
Detroit Tigers
3B
Andrew McCutchen^
Pittsburgh Pirates
OF
[118][119]

2014
Mike Trout^§
Los Angeles Angels of Anaheim
OF
Clayton Kershaw^
Los Angeles Dodgers
LHP
[14][120]

2015
Josh Donaldson^
Toronto Blue Jays
3B
Bryce Harper^§
Washington Nationals
OF
[121][122]

2016
Mike Trout^ (2)
Los Angeles Angels of Anaheim
OF
Kris Bryant^
Chicago Cubs*
3B/OF
[123]

2017
José Altuve^
Houston Astros*
2B
Giancarlo Stanton^
Miami Marlins
OF
[124]

text: Key[edit]

text:
Year

Links to the article about the corresponding Major League Baseball season

Member of the National Baseball Hall of Fame as a player[125][126]

^

Denotes player who is still active[a]

§

Unanimous selection[b][3]

Player (X)

Denotes winning player and number of times they had won the award at that point

*

Team won League Pennant

P

Pitcher (RHP indicates right-handed; LHP indicates left-handed)

C

Catcher

1B

First baseman

2B

Second baseman

3B

Third baseman

SS

Shortstop

OF

Outfielder

DH

Designated hitter


document_title: Joule heating

question_text: who discovered the heating effect of electric current

text: Joule heating

text: History[edit]

text: James Prescott Joule first published in December 1840, an abstract in the Proceedings of the Royal Society, suggesting that heat could be generated by an electrical current. Joule immersed a length of wire in a fixed mass of water and measured the temperature rise due to a known current flowing through the wire for a 30 minute period. By varying the current and the length of the wire he deduced that the heat produced was proportional to the square of the current multiplied by the electrical resistance of the immersed wire.[2]

text: In 1841 and 1842, subsequent experiments showed that the amount of heat generated was proportional to the chemical energy used in the voltaic pile that generated the current. This led Joule to reject the caloric theory (at that time the dominant theory) in favor of the mechanical theory of heat (according to which heat is another form of energy).[2]

text: Resistive heating was independently studied by Heinrich Lenz in 1842.[1]

text: The SI unit of energy was subsequently named the joule and given the symbol J. The commonly known unit of power, the watt, is equivalent to one joule per second.

text: Microscopic description[edit]

text: Joule heating is caused by interactions between charge carriers (usually electrons) and the body of the conductor (usually atomic ions).

text: A voltage difference between two points of a conductor creates an electric field that accelerates charge carriers in the direction of the electric field, giving them kinetic energy. When the charged particles collide with ions in the conductor, the particles are scattered; their direction of motion becomes random rather than aligned with the electric field, which constitutes thermal motion. Thus, energy from the electrical field is converted into thermal energy.[3]

text: Power loss and noise[edit]

text: Joule heating is referred to as ohmic heating or resistive heating because of its relationship to Ohm's Law. It forms the basis for the large number of practical applications involving electric heating. However, in applications where heating is an unwanted by-product of current use (e.g., load losses in electrical transformers) the diversion of energy is often referred to as resistive loss. The use of high voltages in electric power transmission systems is specifically designed to reduce such losses in cabling by operating with commensurately lower currents. The ring circuits, or ring mains, used in UK homes are another example, where power is delivered to outlets at lower currents, thus reducing Joule heating in the wires. Joule heating does not occur in superconducting materials, as these materials have zero electrical resistance in the superconducting state.

text: Resistors create electrical noise, called Johnson–Nyquist noise. There is an intimate relationship between Johnson–Nyquist noise and Joule heating, explained by the fluctuation-dissipation theorem.

text: Formulas[edit]

text: Direct current[edit]

text: The most general and fundamental formula for Joule heating is:

text: where

text:
P is the power (energy per unit time) converted from electrical energy to thermal energy,
I is the current traveling through the resistor or other element,

V

A

−

V

B

{\displaystyle V_{A}-V_{B}}

 is the voltage drop across the element.

tag: ul

text: The explanation of this formula (P=VI) is:[4]

text: When Ohm's law is also applicable, the formula can be written in other equivalent forms:

text: where R is the resistance.

text: Alternating current[edit]

text: When current varies, as it does in AC circuits,

text: where t is time and P is the instantaneous power being converted from electrical energy to heat. Far more often, the average power is of more interest than the instantaneous power:

text: where "avg" denotes average (mean) over one or more cycles, and "rms" denotes root mean square.

text: These formulas are valid for an ideal resistor, with zero reactance. If the reactance is nonzero, the formulas are modified:

text:
where

ϕ

{\displaystyle \phi }

 is the phase difference between current and voltage,

Re

{\displaystyle \operatorname {Re} }

 means real part, Z is the complex impedance, and Y* is the complex conjugate of the admittance (equal to 1/Z*).

text: For more details in the reactive case, see AC power∆0}

text: Differential form[edit]

text: In plasma physics, the Joule heating often needs to be calculated at a particular location in space. The differential form of the Joule heating equation gives the power per unit volume.

text:
Here,

J

{\displaystyle \mathbf {J} }

 is the current density, and

E

{\displaystyle \mathbf {E} }

 is the electric field. For a neutral plasma not in magnetic field and with a conductivity

σ

{\displaystyle \sigma }

,

J

=
σ

E

{\displaystyle \mathbf {J} =\sigma \mathbf {E} }

 and therefore

text:
where

ρ
=
1

/

σ

{\displaystyle \rho =1/\sigma }

 is the resistivity. This directly resembles the "

I

2

R

{\displaystyle I^{2}R}

" term of the macroscopic form.

text: High-voltage alternating current transmission of electricity[edit]

text: Overhead power lines transfer electrical energy from electricity producers to consumers. Those power lines have a nonzero resistance and therefore are subject to Joule heating, which causes transmission losses.

text: The split of power between transmission losses (Joule heating in transmission lines) and load (useful energy delivered to the consumer) can be approximated by a voltage divider. In order to minimize transmission losses, the resistance of the lines has to be as small as possible compared to the load (resistance of consumer appliances). Line resistance is minimized by the use of copper conductors, but the resistance and power supply specifications of consumer appliances are fixed.

text: Usually, a transformer is placed between the lines and consumption. When a high-voltage, low-intensity current in the primary circuit (before the transformer) is converted into a low-voltage, high-intensity current in the secondary circuit (after the transformer), the equivalent resistance of the secondary circuit becomes higher[5] and transmission losses are reduced in proportion.

text: During the War of Currents, AC installations could use transformers to reduce line losses by Joule heating, at the cost of higher voltage in the transmission lines, compared to DC installations.

text: Applications[edit]

text: Joule-heating or resistive-heating is used in multiple devices and industrial process. The part which converts electricity into heat by Joule heating is called a heating element.

text:
Gallery: Different applications of Joule heating

An incandescent light bulb's filament emitting light

Infrared-thermal image of a light bulb

Bulb filament magnified by scanning electron microscope

30 kW resistance heating coils

Electric radiative space heater

Small domestic immersion heater, 500 W

Folded tubular heating element from espresso machine

Laboratory water bath used for reactions at warm temperatures

Electric tabletop hotplate

Laboratory hot plate used for reactions at high temperatures

Clothes iron used to remove wrinkles from clothes

Soldering iron, used to melt solder in electronic work

Portable fan heater, used to heat a room

Hair dryer, produces hot air flow

Cartridge heater glowing red hot

Flexible PTC heater made of conductive rubber

text: There are many practical uses of Joule heating:

text:
An incandescent light bulb glows when the filament is heated by Joule heating, due to thermal radiation (also called blackbody radiation).
Electric fuses are used as a safety, breaking the circuit by melting if enough current flows to melt them.
Electronic cigarettes vaporize propylene glycol and vegetable glycerine by Joule heating.
Multiple heating devices use Joule heating, such as electric stoves, electric heaters, soldering irons, cartridge heaters.
Some food processing equipment may make use of Joule heating: running current through food material (which behave as an electrical resistor) causes heat release inside the food.[6] The alternating electrical current coupled with the resistance of the food causes the generation of heat.[7] A higher resistance increases the heat generated. Ohmic heating allows for fast and uniform heating of food products, which keeps the high quality in foods. Products with particulates heat up faster in Ohmic heating (as compared to conventional heat processing) due to higher resistance.[8]

text: Food Processing[edit]

text: Joule heating (Ohmic Heating) is an HTST, aseptic process that runs an alternating current of 50-60 Hz through food[9]. Heat is generated through the electrical resistance of the food[9]. As the product heats up, electrical conductivity increases linearly[7]. A higher electrical current frequency is best as it reduces oxidation and metallic contamination[9]. This heating method is best for foods that contain particulates suspended in a weak salt containing medium due to their high resistance properties[8]. Ohmic heating allows for a maintained quality of foods due to the uniform heating that decreases deterioration and over-processing of food[9].

text: Benefits[edit]

text: Ohmic heating has similar benefits than other rapid heating methods. This method can destroy microorganisms achieving sterility through electroporation of cell membranes, membrane rupture from the voltage drop across cell membranes, and cell lysis[9].

text: Ideal Food Products[edit]

text:
liquid based products[9]:

thick soups
sauces
stews
salsa
fruit in a syrup medium

text: In particulate foods, the particles heat up faster than the liquid matrix due to the higher resistance to electricity.[9] This prevents overheating of the liquid matrix while the particles receive sufficient heat processing.[9] Below are some examples of different electrical conductivity values of certain foods to display composition and salt concentration affect electrical conductivity.

text:
Electrical conductivity of selected foods[10]

Food
Electrical Conductivity (S/m)
Temperature (°C)

Apple Juice
0.239
20

Beef
0.42
19

Beer
0.143
22

Carrot
0.041
19

Carrot Juice
1.147
22

Chicken meat
0.19
20

Coffee (black)
0.182
22

Coffee (black with sugar)
0.185
22

Coffee (with milk)
0.357
22

Starch solution (5.5%)

(a) with 0.2% salt
0.34
19

(b) with 0.55% salt
1.3
19

(c) with 2% salt
4.3
19

text: Limitations[edit]

text: Ohmic heating is highly influenced by the electrical conductivity of the product[9]. Dependent on the position of the food relative to the electrodes,there can be areas of overprocessing and underprocessing[9]. Fats, oils, alcohols, bone, and crystalline structures cannot be heated directly by ohmic heating due to their low electrical conductivity values[9]. Similarly, it is difficult to obtain uniform heating in non-homogenous food particulates making it difficult to assure sterility [7].

text: Heating efficiency[edit]

text: As a heating technology, Joule heating has a coefficient of performance of 1.0, meaning that every joule of electrical energy supplied produces one joule of heat. In contrast, a heat pump can have a coefficient of more than 1.0 since it moves additional thermal energy from the environment to the heated item.

text: The definition of the efficiency of a heating process requires defining the boundaries of the system to be considered. When heating a building, the overall efficiency is different when considering heating effect per unit of electric energy delivered on the customer's side of the meter, compared to the overall efficiency when also considering the losses in the power plant and transmission of power.

text: Hydraulic equivalent[edit]

text: In the energy balance of groundwater flow a hydraulic equivalent of Joule's law is used:[11]

text: where: