document_title: Gun laws in Switzerland

question_text: what is the gun ownership rate in switzerland

text: Gun laws in Switzerland

text: Number of guns in circulation[edit]

text: Switzerland thus has a relatively high gun ownership rate. There are no official statistics, and estimates vary considerably. The Small Arms Survey of 2016 placed Swiss gun ownership per capita at 24.45%.[4]

text: In 2016, the defence ministry estimated that 2 million privately owned guns are in circulation, which given a population of 8.3 million corresponds to a gun ownership rate of around 24 guns per 100 residents.[5] This is roughly a quarter of the rate in the United States, and lower than that in the neighbouring countries of Germany, and Austria, but about the double of Italy and France.[4]

text: Traditionally liberal Swiss gun legislation has, however, been somewhat tightened in 2008, when Switzerland has complied with European Firearms Directive.[6] Throughout the modern political history of Switzerland, there have been advocates for tighter gun control.[7]

text: The most recent suggestion for tighter gun control was rejected in a popular referendum in February 2011.[8]

text: Regulation[edit]

text: Switzerland's Weapons Law (WG, LArm)[2] and Weapons Act (WV, OArm)[3] has been revised to accede to the Schengen Treaty effective 12 December 2008. The Act on Personal Military Equipement (VPAA, OEPM) regulates the handling of military equipement, and in particular the handling of personal weapons by military personnel.[9]

text: The law is applied to the following weapons:

text:
Firearms, such as pistols, revolvers, rifles, pump guns (German: Vorderschaftrepetierer), lever-action rifles, self-loading guns (shotguns and rifles);
Air and CO2 guns with a muzzle energy of at least 7.5 joules, or if there is risk of confusion with a firearm;
Imitation, blank firing guns (German: Schreckschuss) and soft-air guns when there is risk of confusion with a firearm;
Butterfly knives, throwing knives, switchblade or automatic knives with total length greater than 12 cm and blade length greater than 5 cm;
Daggers with a symmetrical blade less than 30 cm;
Devices that are intended to hurt people such as batons (German: Schlagrute), throwing star, brass knuckles, slings with armrest;
all electric shock devices and spray products with irritants in Annex 2 weapons regulation (WV/OArm), except for pepper spray.

text: Generally prohibited arms are:

text:
Automatic firearms such as machine guns, etc.
Automatic knives when the blade more than 5 cm and total length of more than 12 cm
Butterfly knives when the blade more than 5 cm and total length of more than 12 cm
Throwing knives; regardless of the shape and size
Symmetrical daggers where blade length is less than 30 cm
Brass knuckles
Shock rods or stun guns
Throwing Stars
Buttstock-equipped slingshots German: Schleudern mit Armstütze
tasers
hidden firearms that imitate an object of utility, such as shooting phones.

text: Acquisition[edit]

text: Buying guns[edit]

text: In order to purchase most weapons, the purchaser must obtain a weapon acquisition permit (art. 8 WG/LArm). Swiss citizens and foreigners with a C permit over the age of 18 who are not psychiatrically disqualified nor identified as posing security problems, and who have a clean criminal record can request such a permit. Foreigners with the following citizenship are explicitly excluded from the right to possess weapons: Serbia, Bosnia and Herzegovina, Kosovo, Macedonia, Turkey, Sri Lanka, Algeria and Albania.[note 2] The following information must be provided to the cantonal weapon bureau together with the weapon application form:

text:
valid official identification or passport copy
residence address
criminal record copy not older than 3 months

text: For each transfer of a weapon or an essential weapon component without weapons acquisition permit (art. 10 WG/LArm), a written contract must be concluded. Each Party shall keep them at least ten years. The contract must include the following information (art. 11 WG/LArm):

text:
Family name, first name, birth date, residence address and signature of the person who sells the weapon or essential weapon component
Family name, first name, birth date, residence address and signature of the person who purchases the weapon or an essential weapon component
Kind of weapon, manufacturer or producer, label, caliber, weapon number, and date and place of transfer;
Type and number of official identification of the person who acquires the weapon or the essential weapon component
and an indication of the processing of personal data in connection with the contract in accordance with the privacy policy of the Federation or the cantons, if firearms are transmitted.

text: This information must be sent within 30 days to the cantonal weapon registration bureau, where the weapon holders are registered (art. 9 WG/LArm).

text: Some weapons do not need a weapon acquisition permit (art. 10 WG/LArm):

text:
Single-shot and multi-barreled hunting rifles and replicas of single-shot muzzle loaders
By the Federal Council designated hand bolt-action rifles, which are commonly used in off-duty and sporting gunnery recognized by the military law of 3 February 1952 and shooting clubs for hunting purposes in Switzerland
Single-shot rabbit slayer;
Compressed air and CO2 weapons that develop a muzzle energy of at least 7.5 joules, or may be confused because of their appearance with real firearms

text: Buying Ammunition[edit]

text: In order to purchase ammunition the buyer must follow the same legal rules that apply to buying guns. The buyer can only buy ammunition for guns that he/she legally owns and must provide the following information to the seller (art. 15, 16 WG/LArm; art. 24 WV/OArm):[2][3]

text:
valid official identification or passport (and must be older than 18 and who are not psychiatrically disqualified nor identified as posing security problems, and must not be a citizen of the following countries (art. 12 WV/OArm): Serbia, Bosnia and Herzegovina, Kosovo, Macedonia, Turkey, Sri Lanka, Algeria and Albania)
residence address
criminal record copy not older than 3 months
weapon acquisition permit not older than 2 years, or a weapon carrying permit not older than 5 years

text: This also applies for weapons which do not require a weapon acquisition permit (see above, excluding the weapon acquisition permit, of course).

text: This information must be sent within 30 days to the cantonal weapon registration bureau, where the weapon holder is registered.

text: The same applies to black powder and modern black powder substitutes for use in firing historical rifles.

text: The possession of the following munition is generally prohibited:

text:
Ammunition with armor-piercing bullets
Ammunition with projectiles containing an explosive or incendiary device
Ammunition with one or more floors to the release of substances which damage the health of people in the long run
Ammunition, missiles and missile launchers for military explosive
Ammunition with projectiles for transmitting electric shocks
Ammunition for handguns with deformation effect

text: Carrying guns[edit]

text: To carry a firearm in public or outdoors (and for a militia member to carry a firearm other than his issued weapons while off-duty), a person must have a gun carrying permit (German: Waffentragbewilligung, French: permis de port d'armes, Italian: permesso di porto di armi; art. 27 WG/LArm), which in most cases is issued only to private citizens working in occupations such as security.[2] It is, however, quite common to see a person in military service to be en route with his rifle, albeit unloaded.[9] The issue of such exceptional permits are extremely selective.[clarification needed]

text: However, it is permissible to carry firearms in public or outdoors if the holder (art. 27 § 4 WG/LArm):

text:
Has a valid hunting license and is carrying the firearm for hunting;
Is participating in a demonstration and is carrying the firearm in reference to a historical event;
Is participating in a shooting competition for air-soft guns, provided that the competition has a secure perimeter; or
Is an airport security officer for an authorized country, a border patrol officer, or a game warden, who is carrying the firearm in the course of their employment.

text: Furthermore, any licensed holder of a gun may transport an unloaded firearm for special situations (see #Transporting guns).

text: Conditions for obtaining a Carrying Permit[edit]

text: There are three conditions (art. 27 § 2 WG/LArm):

text:
fulfilling the conditions for a buying permit (see section above)
stating plausibly the need to carry firearms to protect oneself, other people, or real property from a specified danger
passing an examination proving both weapon handling skills and knowledge regarding lawful use of the weapon

text: The carrying permit remains valid for a term of five years (unless otherwise surrendered or revoked), and applies only to the type of firearm for which the permit was issued. Additional constraints may be invoked to modify any specific permit. (art. 27 § 3 WG/LArm)

text: Transporting guns[edit]

text: Guns may be transported in public as long as an appropriate justification is present. This means to transport a gun in public, the following requirements apply (art. 28 WG/LArm):

text:
The ammunition must be separated from the gun, no ammunition in a magazine.
The transport needs to be as direct as possible and needs a valid purpose:

For courses or exercises hosted by marksmanship, hunting or military organisations,
To an army warehouse and back,
To show the gun to a friend or a possible buyer
To and from a holder of a valid arms trade permit,
To and from a specific event, e.g. gun shows.
During change of residence.

text: EU Gun Ban[edit]

text: A 2017 amendment to the EU Firearms Directive, known as the "EU Gun Ban",[11][12][13][14] introduces new restrictions on firearms possession and acquisition, especially on semi-automatic firearms, personal defense weapons, magazine capacity, blank firing guns and historical firearms. The restrictions must be introduced into the Swiss legal system by August 2018 due to its membership of the Schengen area.

text: The Directive also includes an exemption covering a specific Swiss issue - it allows possession to a target shooter of one firearm used during the mandatory military period after leaving the army, provided it was converted to semi-automatic only (art. 6(6) of the Amendment Directive).[15] This part of the Directive specifically was however challenged by the Czech Republic in front of the European Court of Justice due to its discriminatory nature. The Czech Republic seeks nullification of the "Swiss exemption" as well as of other parts of the Directive.[16]

text: Civil rights organizations plan to hold a referendum to reject the recent EU directive.[17] [18] According to Swiss People's Party vice-president Christoph Blocher, Switzerland should consider abandoning EU's borderless Schengen Area if the Swiss people reject the proposed measures in a referendum.[19]

text: Army-issued arms and ammunition collection[edit]

text: The Swiss army has long been a militia trained and structured to rapidly respond against foreign aggression. Swiss males grow up expecting to undergo basic military training, usually at age 20 in the recruit school, the basic-training camp, after which Swiss men remain part of the "militia" in reserve capacity until age 30 (age 34 for officers).

text: Prior to 2007 members of the Swiss Militia were supplied with 50-rounds of ammunition for their military weapon in a sealed ammo box that was regularly audited by the government. This was so that, in the case of an emergency, the militia could respond quickly.

text: In December 2007, the Swiss Federal Council decided that the distribution of ammunition to soldiers would stop and that previously issued ammo would be returned. By March 2011, more than 99% of the ammo has been received. Only 2,000 specialist militia members (who protect airports and other sites of particular sensitivity) are permitted to keep their military-issued ammunition at home. The rest of the militia get their ammunition from their military armory in the event of an emergency.[2][20][21]

text: When their period of service has ended, militia men have the choice of keeping their personal weapon and other selected items of their equipment. However, keeping the weapon after end of service requires a weapon acquisition permit (art. 11-15 VPAA/OEPM).[9]

text: The government sponsors training with rifles and shooting in competitions for interested adolescents, both male and female. The sale of ammunition – including Gw Pat.90 rounds for army-issue assault rifles – is subsidized by the Swiss government and made available at the many Federal Council licensed shooting ranges. That ammunition sold at ranges must be immediately used there under supervision (art. 16 WG/LArm).

text: The Swiss Army maintains tightened adherence to high standards of lawful military conduct. In 2005, for example, when the Swiss prosecuted recruits who had reenacted the torture scenes of Abu Ghraib, one of the charges was improper use of service weapons.[22]

text: Recreational shooting[edit]

text: Recreational shooting is widespread in Switzerland. Practice with guns is a popular form of recreation, and is encouraged by the government, particularly for the members of the militia.

text: Prior to the turn of the century, about 200,000 people used to attend the annual Feldschiessen, which is the largest rifle shooting competition in the world. In 2012 they counted 130,000 participants.[23] For the 2015 Federal Shooting (Eidg. Schützenfest) 37,000 shooters are registered.[24] In addition, there are several private shooting ranges which rent guns.

text: Gun culture in Switzerland[edit]

text: Switzerland has a strong gun culture compared to other countries in the world.[25][26] Groups like ProTell lobby for the preservation of Switzerland's gun rights. Additionally, the Schweizerischer Schützenverein, a Swiss shooting association, organizes the Eidgenössische Schützenfeste, currently in intervals of five years.

text: Firearm-related deaths[edit]

text: The vast majority of firearm-related deaths in Switzerland are suicides. The suicide method of shooting oneself with a firearm accounted for 21.5% of suicides in Switzerland in the period of 2001–2012 (with significant gender imbalance: 29.7% of male suicides vs. 3.0% of female suicides).[27]

text: By contrast, gun crime is comparatively limited. In 2016, there were 187 attempted and 45 completed homicides, for a homicide rate of 0.50 per 100,000 population. Of the recorded homicides (attempted or completed), 20.3% were committed with a gun (47 cases, compared to an average of 41 cases in the period of 2009–2015). In addition, there were 7 cases of bodily harm and 233 cases of robbery committed with firearms.[28]

text: There were 16 completed homicides with a firearm in 2016. Of these, 14 were committed with a handgun, one with a long gun and one case marked "other/unspecified". None of the involved weapons were ordnance weapons issued by the Swiss Armed Forces. Similarly, out of 31 attempted homicides with firearms, 25 were committed with handguns, two with long guns and four "other/unspecified", with no use of ordnance weapons on record. For the period of 2009–2016, on average 16.5 out of 49.4 completed homicides were committed with a firearm, 13.8 with handguns, 1.9 with long guns and 0.9 "other/unspecified"; an average 0.75 cases per year (6 cases in eight years) involved ordnance weapons.[29]


document_title: Lynne Carol

question_text: who died in the snug on coronation street

root

text: Lynne Carol

text: This article needs additional citations for verification. Please help improve this article by adding citations to reliable sources. Unsourced material may be challenged and removed. (October 2009) (Learn how and when to remove this template message)

tag: table

text:
Lynne Carol

Born
Josephine Caroline Gertrude Mary Faith Harber
(1914-06-29)29 June 1914
Usk, Monmouthshire, Wales

Died
30 June 1990(1990-06-30) (aged 76)
Blackpool, Lancashire, England

Occupation
Actress

Years active
1960–1980

Spouse(s)
Bert Palmer (1934-1980; his death)

text: Josephine Caroline Gertrude Mary Faith Harber (29 June 1914 – 30 June 1990), better known as Lynne Carol, was a Welsh born (but usually described as English) actress best known for playing busybody Martha Longhurst in the soap opera Coronation Street from the second episode in 1960 until the character was killed off in 1964.

tag: p

text: Early life and career[edit]

text: A descendant of six generations of actors, Lynne Carol (also known as Josephine Palmer) was born in Monmouthshire, south east Wales, where her actor parents Charles Harber and Mina Harber (née McKinnon) were touring in a stage play. Carol started her own acting career at the age of only three. Before landing the part of Martha Longhurst, Carol worked in the provincial theatre for many years.

text: Carol played Martha Longhurst as a waspish beldam, who first appeared in December 1960; with Ena Sharples, played by Violet Carson and Minnie Caldwell, played by Margot Bryant she made up the formidable trio that held court in the snug of local public house, the Rovers Return. The verbal interplay between the three epitomised the serial's North of England humanity and yielded some of the 'richest moments' in the programme. The renown of Martha Longhurst became such that Carol's unpublicised visit to the Ideal Home Exhibition caused a near riot. She was advised to leave the premises for her own safety[citation needed]. Her fan-base even included such international stars as the actor Laurence Olivier and the poet John Betjeman.

text: After only three years in the series, the character of Martha Longhurst was axed by a new producer, who assumed that Carol would be likely to find other acting jobs. Carol was deeply shocked to read in the newspaper that the days of her character were now numbered[citation needed]. Martha died quietly of a heart attack in the snug (one of the three bars in the Rovers, the others being the public and the select) of the public house in May 1964. The subsequent burial took place in the Manchester General Cemetery where a special grave had been prepared. Carol remained bitter about Martha's death, and believed to the end that a terrible mistake had been made, as her character was so popular. Viewers responded by complaining in their thousands and, later, the writers acknowledged that they had made a mistake.

text: Carol later appeared in the short-lived BBC serial The Newcomers - alongside Alan Browning, who later appeared in Coronation Street as Alan Howard. She also appeared in the 1979 film Yanks starring Richard Gere.

text: Personal life[edit]

text: Carol married Bert Palmer (1901-15 January 1980), a character actor from Lancashire, who appeared in two episodes of Coronation Street and the pilot episode of its first spin-off, Pardon the Expression, and they made their home in Blackpool. Her husband died in 1980. Lynne Carol died in Blackpool, Lancashire, England in 1990, aged 76, she had three children, two sons, Michael and Robert and a daughter, Jan. Her brother James Harber was also a stage actor.


document_title: Rail transport in Great Britain

question_text: how many journeys are made on britain’s railway network each year

question_tokens: how many journeys are made on britain 's railway network each year

text: Rail transport in Great Britain

text: Historical overview[edit]

text: The railways started with the building of local isolated wooden wagonways in 1560s. These wagonways soon spread out across the country. The system was later built as patchwork of local lines operated by small private railway companies. Over the course of the 19th and early 20th centuries, these amalgamated or were bought by competitors until only a handful of larger companies remained (see Railway Mania). The entire network was brought under government control during the First World War and a number of advantages of amalgamation and planning were revealed. However, the government resisted calls for the nationalisation of the network (first proposed by 19th century Prime Minister William Ewart Gladstone as early as the 1830s). Instead, from 1 January 1923, almost all the remaining companies were grouped into the "big four": the Great Western Railway, the London and North Eastern Railway, the London, Midland and Scottish Railway and the Southern Railway companies (there were also a number of other joint railways such as the Midland and Great Northern Joint Railway and the Cheshire Lines Committee as well as special joint railways such as the Forth Bridge Railway, Ryde Pier Railway and at one time the East London Railway). The "Big Four" were joint-stock public companies and they continued to run the railway system until 31 December 1947.

text: The growth in road transport during the 1920s and 1930s greatly reduced revenue for the rail companies. Rail companies accused the government of favouring road haulage through the subsidised construction of roads. The railways entered a slow decline owing to a lack of investment and changes in transport policy and lifestyles. During the Second World War the companies' managements joined together, effectively forming one company. A maintenance backlog developed during the war and the private sector only had two years to deal with this after the war ended. After 1945, for both practical and ideological reasons, the government decided to bring the rail service into the public sector.

text: Nationalisation[edit]

text: From the start of 1948, the "big four" were nationalised to form British Railways (latterly "British Rail") under the control of the British Transport Commission. Although BR was a single entity, it was divided into six (later five) regional authorities in accordance with the existing areas of operation. Though there were few initial changes to the service, usage increased and the network became profitable. Regeneration of track and railway stations was completed by 1954. In the same year, changes to the British Transport Commission, including the privatisation of road haulage, ended the coordination of transport in Great Britain. Rail revenue fell and in 1955 the network again ceased to be profitable. The mid-1950s saw the rapid introduction of diesel and electric rolling stock, but the expected transfer back from road to rail did not occur and losses began to mount.

text: The desire for profitability led to a major reduction in the network during the mid-1960s, with ICI manager Dr. Richard Beeching commissioned by the government under Ernest Marples with reorganising the railways. Many branch lines (and a number of main lines) were closed because they were deemed uneconomic ("the Beeching Axe" of 1963), removing much feeder traffic from main line passenger services. In the second Beeching report of 1965, only the "major trunk routes" were selected for large-scale investment, leading many to speculate the rest of the network would eventually be closed. This was never implemented by BR.

text: Passenger services experienced a renaissance with the introduction of the InterCity 125 trains in the 1970s. Passenger levels fluctuated since then, increasing during periods of economic growth and falling during recessions. The 1980s saw severe cuts in government funding and above-inflation increases in fares,[6] and the service became more cost-effective[citation needed]. In the early 1990s, the five geographical Regions were replaced by a Sectored organisation, in which passenger services were organised into InterCity, Network SouthEast and Regional Railways sectors.

text: Privatisation[edit]

text: British Rail operations were privatised during 1994–1997. Ownership of the track and infrastructure passed to Railtrack, whilst passenger operations were franchised to individual private sector operators (originally there were 25 franchises) and the goods services sold outright (six companies were set up, but five of these were sold to the same buyer). The government said privatisation would see an improvement in passenger services and satisfaction (according to the National Rail Passenger survey) has indeed gone up from 76% in 1999 (when the survey started) to 83% in 2013 and the number of passengers not satisfied with their journey dropped from 10% to 6%.[7] Since privatisation, passenger levels have more than doubled, and have surpassed their level in the late 1940s. Train fares cost 2.7% more than under British Rail in real terms on average.[8] However, while the price of anytime and off-peak tickets has increased, the price of Advance tickets has dramatically decreased in real terms: the average Advance ticket in 1995 cost £9.14 (in 2014 prices) compared to £5.17 in 2014.[9]

text: Rail subsidies have increased from £2.5bn in 1992-93 to £3.3bn in 2015-16 (in current prices), although subsidy per journey has fallen from £3.32 per journey to £1.89 per journey.[8][10] However, this masks great regional variation, as in 2014-15 funding varied from "£1.41 per passenger journey in England to £6.51 per journey in Scotland and £8.34 per journey in Wales."[10]

text: The public image of rail travel was severely damaged by a series of significant accidents after privatisation. These included the Hatfield accident, caused by a rail fragmenting due to the development of microscopic cracks. Following this, the rail infrastructure company Railtrack imposed over 1,200 emergency speed restrictions across its network and instigated an extremely costly nationwide track replacement programme. The consequent severe operational disruption to the national network and the company's spiralling costs set in motion a series of events which resulted in the collapse of the company and its replacement with Network Rail, a state-owned,[11] not-for-profit company. According to the European Railway Agency, in 2013 Britain had the safest railways in Europe based on the number of train safety incidents.[12]

text: At the end of September 2003, the first part of High Speed 1, a high-speed link to the Channel Tunnel and onward to France and Belgium, was completed, significantly adding to the rail infrastructure of the country. The rest of the link, from north Kent to St Pancras railway station in London, opened in 2007. A major programme of remedial work on the West Coast Main Line started in 1997 and finished in 2009.[citation needed]

text: In the 2010s, many upgrades are under way, such as the Thameslink Programme, Crossrail, the Northern Hub and electrification of the Great Western Main Line. Electrification plans for the Midland Main Line and the cross-Pennine line between Manchester and Leeds have been paused with the start of work on these projects postponed to some indefinite date(s)in the 2020s. Planning for High Speed 2 is underway, with a projected completion date of 2026 for Phase 1 (London to Birmingham) and 2033 for Phase 2.

text:
[show]

v
t
e

History of rail transport in Great Britain

pre-1830
The pioneers

1830–1922
Early development

1923–1947
The Big Four

1948–1994
British Rail

1995 to date
Post-privatisation

text: Passenger services[edit]

text: Passenger services in Great Britain are divided into regional franchises and run by private (that is, non-state owned) train operating companies. These companies bid for seven- to eight-year contracts to run individual franchises. Most contracts are awarded by the Department for Transport (DfT), with the exception of Merseyrail, where the franchise is awarded by Merseyside Passenger Transport Executive, and ScotRail, where the DfT awards on the advice of the Scottish Government. Initially, there were 25 franchises, but the number of different operating companies is smaller as some firms, including FirstGroup and Stagecoach Group, run more than one franchise. In addition, some franchises have since been combined. There are also a number of local or specialised rail services operated on an 'open access' basis outside the franchise arrangements. Examples include Heathrow Express and Hull Trains.

text: In the 2015–16 operating year, franchised services provided 1,718 million journeys totalling (64.7 billion billion passenger km) of travel, an increase over 1994–5 of 117% in journeys (from 761 million) and just over doubling the passenger miles.[13] The passenger-miles figure, after being flat from 1965 to 1995, surpassed the 1947 figure for the first time in 1998 and continues to rise steeply.

text: The key index used to assess passenger train performance is the Public Performance Measure, which combines figures for punctuality and reliability. From a base of 90% of trains arriving on time in 1998, the measure dipped to 75% in mid-2001 due to stringent safety restrictions put in place after the Hatfield crash in October 2000. However, in June 2015 the PPM stood at 91.2% after a period of steady increases in the annual moving average since 2003 until around 2012 when the improvements levelled off.[14]

text: Train fares cost 2.7% more than under British Rail in real terms on average.[8] For some years, Britain has been said to have the highest rail fares in Europe, with peak-time and season tickets considerably higher than other countries, partly because rail subsidies in Europe are higher.[15][16] However, they are also able to obtain some of the cheapest fares in Europe if they book in advance or travel at off-peak times.[15]

text: UK rail operators point out rail fare increases have been at a substantially lower rate than petrol prices for private motoring.[4] The difference in price has also been blamed on the fact Britain has the most restrictive loading gauge (maximum width and height of trains that can fit through tunnels, bridges etc.) in the world which means any trains must be significantly narrower and less tall than those used elsewhere. This means British trains cannot be bought "off-the-shelf" and must be specially built to fit British standards.

text: Average rolling-stock age fell slightly from the third quarter of 2001–2 to the fourth quarter of 2013–4, from 20.7 years old to 19.4 years old.[17]

text: Although passengers rarely have cause to refer to either document, all travel is subject to the National Rail Conditions of Carriage and all tickets are valid subject to the rules set out in a number of so-called technical manuals, which are centrally produced for the network.

text:
[show]

v
t
e

British railway ticketing

Ticket office-based machines

INTIS
APTIS
Tribute
Shere SMART
Fujitsu STAR
Cubic FasTIS

Passenger-operated machines

Ascom B8050 Quickfare
Avantix B8070
Cubic QueueBuster
Shere FASTticket
Scheidt & Bachmann Ticket XPress
Ascom EasyTicket
Parkeon Astreo
Parkeon Galexio
PERTIS

Conductor-operated machines

PORTIS/SPORTIS
Avantix Mobile
Fujitsu Star Mobile
Worldline Envoy
Doris

Travel agency and online sales

Inclusive Tour Coupons
AJENTS
ELGAR
Evolvi

Ticket types and formats

Edmondson railway ticket (defunct)
APTIS ticket features (now deprecated)
2014 National Rail ticket features (current)
Concessionary fares on the British railway network

Information and revenue allocation systems

National Location Code
ORCATS
Rail Settlement Plan
Station groups

Revenue protection and law

Penalty fare
Regulation of Railways Act 1889
Railways Act 1993
Transport Act 2000

text: Annual passenger numbers[edit]

text: Below are the total number of passengers using heavy rail transport in Britain. The numbers are calculated from September to August. (This table does not include Eurostar, Heathrow Express, Heathrow Connect or open access operators such as Grand Central and Hull Trains)

text:
Annual passenger numbers[18]

Year

Passengers

Passenger
% Change

Journeys[nb 1]

Journeys
% Change

2004–2005
781,343,720

902,695,324

2005–2006
800,669,217
8 !2.47
920,849,661
8 !2.01

2006–2007
958,095,205
1 !19.66[nb 2]
1,091,288,285
1 !18.51

2007–2008
1,024,602,056
3 !6.94
1,167,233,872
4 !6.96

2008–2009
1,073,753,933
7 !4.80
1,220,145,654
6 !4.53

2009–2010
1,065,386,249
10 !0.78
1,218,715,041
10 !0.12

2010–2011
1,156,896,521
2 !8.59
1,322,426,386
2 !8.51

2011–2012
1,227,960,111
4 !6.14
1,428,575,382
3 !8.03

2012–2013
1,268,979,546
9 !3.34
1,480,120,447
9 !3.61

2013-2014
1,332,561,756
6 !5.00
1,558,753,504
5 !5.31

2014-2015
1,392,535,310
8 !4.50
1,622,975,245
7 !4.12

2015-2016
1,463,777,211
5 !5.12
1,685,933,571
8 !3.88

text: The following table is according to the Office of Rail and Road and includes open access operators such as Grand Central and Hull Trains.

text:
Annual Passenger Numbers (millions)[19]

Year

Long distance

London and
South East

Regional

Non-franchised
operators

Total

Total % Change

2002–2003
77.2
679.1
219.2
0
975.5

2003–2004
81.5
690.0
240.2
0
1,011.7
3.71

2004–2005
83.7
704.5
251.3
0
1,039.5
2.75

2005–2006
89.5
719.7
267.3
0
1,076.5
3.56

2006–2007
99.0
769.5
276.5
0
1,145.0
6.36

2007–2008
103.9
828.4
285.8
0
1,218.1
6.38

2008–2009
109.4
854.3
302.8
0
1,266.5
3.97

2009–2010
111.6
842.2
304.0
1.4
1,259.3
0.68

2010–2011
117.9
917.6
318.2
1.8
1,3555.6
7.65

2011–2012
125.3
993.8
340.9
1.5
1,461.5
7.82

2012–2013
127.7
1,032.4
340.9
1.7
1,502.6
2.81

2013–2014
129.0
1,106.9
350.5
1.9
1,588.3
5.70

2014–2015
134.2
1,154.9
364.7
2.1
1,655.8
4.25

2015–2016
138.3
1,202.8
374.2
2.3
1,717.6[20]
3.72

text:
Jump up ^ Passenger numbers plus interchanges
Jump up ^ The large increase was due to including journeys on the National Rail network that were purchased through TfL

tag: ol

text: Railway stations[edit]

text: There are 2,564 passenger railway stations on the Network Rail network. This does not include the London Underground, nor other systems which are not part of the national network, such as heritage railways. Most date from the Victorian era and a number are in or on the edge of town and city centres. Major stations lie for the most part in large cities, with the largest conurbations (e.g. Liverpool, Birmingham, Bristol, Cardiff, Edinburgh, Glasgow and Manchester) typically having more than one main station. London is a major hub of the network, with 12 main-line termini forming a "ring" around central London. Birmingham, Leeds, Manchester, Glasgow, Bristol and Reading are major interchanges for many cross-country journeys that do not involve London. However, some important railway junction stations lie in smaller cities and towns, for example York, Crewe and Ely. Some other places expanded into towns and cities because of the railway network. Swindon, for example, was little more than a village before the Great Western Railway chose to site its locomotive works there. In many instances geography, politics or military considerations[citation needed] originally caused stations to be sited further from the towns they served until, with time, these issues could be overcome (for example, Portsmouth had its original station at Gosport).

text:
[show]

v
t
e

Major railway stations in Great Britain

Managed by Network Rail

Birmingham New Street
Bristol Temple Meads
Edinburgh Waverley
Glasgow Central
Leeds
Liverpool Lime Street
Manchester Piccadilly
Reading

Managed by train operator

Aberdeen
Birmingham Moor Street
Brighton
Cardiff Central
Crewe
Gatwick Airport
Glasgow Queen Street
Manchester Victoria
Newcastle
Nottingham
Sheffield
Southampton Central
Swansea
York

London

Managed by Network Rail (termini)

Cannon Street
Charing Cross
Euston
King's Cross
Liverpool Street
London Bridge
Paddington
St Pancras
Victoria
Waterloo

Managed by train operator

Termini

Fenchurch Street
Marylebone
Moorgate

Through stations

Blackfriars
City Thameslink
Clapham Junction
Stratford
Waterloo East

text: High-speed rail[edit]

text: High-speed rail (above 124 mph or 200 km/h) was first introduced in Great Britain in the 1970s by British Rail. BR had pursued two development projects in parallel, the development of a tilting train technology, the 'Advanced Passenger Train' (APT), and development of a conventional high-speed diesel train, the 'High Speed Train' (HST). The APT project was abandoned, but the HST design entered service as the British Rail Classes 253, 254 and 255 trains. The prototype HST, the British Rail Class 252, reached a world speed record for diesel trains of 143.2 mph, while the main fleet entered service limited to a service speed of 125 mph, and were introduced progressively on main lines across the country, with a rebranding of their services as the InterCity 125. With electrification of the East Coast Main Line, high-speed rail in Great Britain was augmented with the introduction of the British Rail Class 91, intended for passenger service at up to 140 mph (225 km/h), and thus branded as the InterCity 225. The Class 91 units were designed for a maximum service speed of 140 mph, and running at this speed was trialled with a 'flashing green' signal aspect under the British signalling system. The trains were eventually limited to the same speed as the HST, to 125 mph, with higher speeds deemed to require cab signalling, which as of 2010 was not in place on the normal British railway network (but was used on the Channel Tunnel Rail Link). A final attempt by the nationalised British Rail at High Speed Rail was the cancelled InterCity 250 project in the 1990s for the West Coast Main Line.

text: Post privatisation, a plan to upgrade the West Coast Main Line to speeds of up to 140 mph with infrastructure improvements were finally abandoned, although the tilting train Class 390 Pendolino fleet designed for this maximum speed of service were still built and entered service in 2002, and operates limited to 125 mph. Other routes in the UK were upgraded with trains capable of top speeds of up to 125 mph running with the introduction between 2000 and 2005 of Class 180 Adelante DMUs and the Bombardier Voyager family of DEMUs (Classes 220, 221 and 222).

text: High Speed 1[edit]

text: The first implementation of high-speed rail up to 186 mph in regular passenger service in Great Britain was the Channel Tunnel Rail Link (now known as High Speed 1), when its first phase opened in 2003 linking the British end of the Channel Tunnel at Folkestone with Fawkham Junction in Kent. This is used by international only passenger trains for the Eurostar service, using British Rail Class 373 trains. The line was later extended all the way into London St Pancras in 2007.

text: After the building of the first of a new British Rail Class 395 train fleet for use partly on High Speed 1 and parts of the rest of the UK rail network, the first domestic high-speed running over 125 mph (to about 140 mph) began in December 2009, including a special Olympic Javelin shuttle for the 2012 Olympics. These services are operated by the Southeastern franchise.

text: Intercity Express Programme[edit]

text: For replacement of the domestic fleet of Intercity 125 and 225 trains on the existing national network, the Intercity Express Programme was announced. In 2009 it was announced the preferred rolling stock option for this project was the Hitachi Super Express family of multiple units, and they are expected to enter service from 2017 on the Great Western Main Line and 2018 on the East Coast Main Line. The trains will be capable of a maximum speed of 140 mph with "minor modifications", with the necessary signalling modifications required of the Network Rail infrastructure in Britain likely to come from the phased roll out of the Europe-wide European Rail Traffic Management System (ERTMS).

text: High Speed 2[edit]

text: Following several studies and consultations on high-speed rail, in 2009 the UK Government formally announced the High Speed 2 project, establishing a company to produce a feasibility study to examine route options and financing for a new high-speed railway in the UK. This study began on the assumption the route would be a new purpose-built high-speed line connected to High-Speed 1 to the Channel tunnel and from London to the West Midlands, via London Heathrow, relieving traffic on the West Coast Main Line. Conventional high-speed rail technology would be used as opposed to Maglev. The rolling stock would be capable of travelling on the existing Network Rail infrastructure if required, with the route intersecting with the existing West Coast Main Line (WCML) and the East Coast Main Line (ECML). A second phase of the project is planned to reach further north to Manchester, Sheffield and Leeds, as well as linking into the Midland Main Line.

text: High Speed 3[edit]

text: In June 2014, Chancellor of the Exchequer, George Osborne proposed a high-speed rail link High Speed 3 (HS3) between Liverpool and Newcastle/Sheffield/Hull. The line would utilise the existing route between Liverpool and Newcastle/Hull and a new route from to Sheffield will follow the same route to Manchester Victoria and then a new line from Victoria to Sheffield, with additional tunnels and other infrastructure.

text: High-speed rolling stock[edit]

text: In August 2009 the speeds of the fastest trains operating in Great Britain capable of a top speed of over 125 mph were as follows:

text:
Name
Locomotive class
Type
Max. recorded speed (mph (km/h))
Max. design speed (mph (km/h))
Max. speed in service (mph (km/h))

Eurostar, e320
374
EMU
219 (352)
200 (320)
N/A

Eurostar, e300
373
EMU
209 (334.7)
186 (300)
186 (300)

Javelin
395
EMU
157 (252)[21]
140 (225)
140 (225)

InterCity 225
91
Electric Loco
162 (261)
140 (225)
125 (200)

Pendolino
390
EMU
162 (261)[22]
140 (225)
125 (200)

InterCity 125
43 (HST)
Diesel Loco
148 (~240)
125 (200)
125 (200)

Adelante
180
DMU
125 (200)
125 (200)
125 (200)

Voyager
220
DEMU
125 (200)
125 (200)
125 (200)

Super Voyager
221
DEMU
125 (200)
125 (200)
125 (200)

Meridian/Pioneer
222
DEMU
125 (200)
125 (200)
125 (200)

Class 67
67
Diesel Loco
125 (200)
125 (200)
125 (200)

Hitachi Super Express
800, 801, 802
EMU
???
140 (225)
125 (200)

text: In 2011 the fastest timetabled start-to-stop run by a UK domestic train service was the Hull Trains 07.30 King's Cross to Hull, which covered the 125.4 km (78 miles) from Stevenage to Grantham in 42 minutes at an average speed of 179.1 km/h (111.4 mph). This is operated by a Class 180 diesel unit running "under the wires" on this East Coast route. This was matched by several Leeds to London Class 91-operated East Coast trains if their two-minute recovery allowance for this section is excluded from the public timetable.[23]

text: Local metro and other rail systems[edit]

text: A number of towns and cities have rapid transit systems. Heavy rail underground technology is used in the London and Glasgow Underground systems while the Merseyrail system in Liverpool shares some characteristics. Light rail with some underground sections exist in Newcastle upon Tyne on the Tyne and Wear Metro and in the London Docklands. The light rail systems in Nottingham, Sheffield, Manchester, Croydon, Birmingham/Black Country and Edinburgh use a combination of street running tramways and, where available, reserved right of way or former conventional rail lines in some suburbs. Blackpool has the one remaining traditional tram system. Monorails, heritage tramways, miniature railways and funiculars also exist in several places. In addition, there are a number of heritage (mainly steam) standard and narrow gauge railways, and a few industrial railways and tramways. Some lines which appear to be heritage operations sometimes claim to be part of the public transport network; the Romney, Hythe and Dymchurch Railway in Kent regularly transports schoolchildren.

text: Most major cities have some form of commuter rail network. These include Belfast, Birmingham, Bristol, Cardiff, Edinburgh, Glasgow, Leeds, Liverpool, London and Manchester.

text:
[show]

v
t
e

Local rail transport in the United Kingdom

Metros

Docklands Light Railway (East London)
Glasgow Subway
London Underground

Night Tube

Tyne and Wear Metro

Tramways

Blackpool
Edinburgh
Greater Manchester
Nottingham
Sheffield
South London
West Midlands

Urban rail

Belfast
Bristol
Birmingham
Cardiff
Edinburgh
Glasgow
Leeds/Bradford
Liverpool
London

text: Goods services[edit]

text: There are four main goods operating companies in the UK, the largest of which is DB Cargo UK (formerly DB Schenker formerly English Welsh & Scottish (EWS)). There are also several smaller independent operators including Mendip Rail. Types of freight carried include intermodal — in essence containerised freight — and coal, metals, oil, and construction material. The Beeching Cuts, in contrast to passenger services, greatly modernised the goods sector, replacing inefficient wagons with containerised regional hubs.[25] Freight services had been in steady decline since the 1930s, initially because of the loss of manufacturing and then road haulage's cost advantage in combination with higher wages.[26][27] Since 1995, however, the amount of freight carried on the railways has increased sharply due to increased reliability and competition, as well as international services.[26][28] The Department for Transport's Transport Ten Year Plan calls for an 80% increase in rail freight measured from a 2000–1 base.[29]

text: Statistics on freight are specified in terms of the weight of freight lifted, and the net tonne kilometre, being freight weight multiplied by distance carried. 116.6 million tonnes of freight was lifted in the 2013–4 period, against 138 million tonnes in 1986–7, a decrease of 16%.[30] However, a record 22.7 billion net tonne kilometres (14 billion net ton miles) of freight movement were recorded in 2013-4, against 16.6 billion (10.1 billion) in 1986–7, an increase of 38%.[30] Coal makes up 36% of the total net tonne kilometre, though its share is declining.[31] Rail freight has increased its market share since privatisation (by net tonne kilometres) from 7.4% in 1998 to 11.1% in 2013.[32] Recent growth is partly due to more international services including the Channel Tunnel and Port of Felixstowe, which is containerised.[33] Nevertheless, network bottlenecks and insufficient investment in catering for 9' 6" high shipping containers restrict growth.[28]

text: A symbolic loss to the rail freight industry in Great Britain was the custom of the Royal Mail, which from 2004 discontinued use of its 49-train fleet, and switching to road haulage after a near 170-year-preference for trains. Mail trains had long been part of the tradition of the railways in Great Britain, famously celebrated in the film Night Mail, for which W. H. Auden wrote the poem of the same name. Although Royal Mail suspended the Mail train in January 2004, this decision was reversed in December of the same year, and Class 325s are now used on some routes including between London, Warrington and Scotland.

text: Train leasing services[edit]

text: At the time of privatisation, the rolling stock of British Rail was sold to the new operators, as in the case of the freight companies, or to the three ROSCOs (rolling stock operating companies) which lease or hire stock to passenger and freight train operators. Leasing is relatively commonplace in transport, since it enables operating companies to avoid the complication associated with raising sufficient capital to purchase assets; instead, assets are leased and paid for from ongoing revenue. Since 1994 there has been a growth in smaller spot-hire companies that provide rolling stock on short-term contracts. Many of these have grown thanks to the major selling-off of locomotives by the large freight operators, especially EWS.

text: Unlike other major players in the privatised railway system of Great Britain, the ROSCOs are not subject to close regulation by the economic regulatory authority. They were expected to compete with one another, and they do, although not in all respects.

text: Competition codes of practice[edit]

text: Since privatisation in 1995, the ROSCOs have faced criticism from several quarters - including passenger train operating companies such as GNER, Arriva and FirstGroup - on the basis they are acting as an oligopoly to keep lease prices higher than they would be in a competitive market. In 1998, Deputy Prime Minister John Prescott asked Rail Regulator John Swift QC to investigate the market's operation and make recommendations. Many believed Prescott favoured much closer regulation of the ROSCOs, perhaps bringing them into the net of contract-specific regulation, i.e., requiring every rolling stock lease to be approved by the Rail Regulator before it could be valid. Swift's report did not find major problems with the operation of what was then an infant market, and instead recommended the ROSCOs sign up to voluntary, non-binding codes of practice in relation to their future behaviour. Prescott did not like this, but he did not have the legislative time allocation to do much about it. Swift's successor as Rail Regulator, Tom Winsor, agreed with Swift and the ROSCOs were happy to go along with codes of practice, coupled with the Rail Regulator's new powers to deal with abuse of dominance and anti-competitive behaviour under the Competition Act 1998. In establishing these codes, the Rail Regulator made it clear he expected the ROSCOs to adhere to their letter and spirit. The codes of practice were duly put in place and for the next five years the Rail Regulator received no complaints about ROSCO behaviour.

text: White paper 2004[edit]

text: In July 2004, the Department for Transport's White Paper on the future of the railways contained a statement it was dissatisfied with the operation of the rolling stock leasing market and believed there may have been excessive pricing on the part of the ROSCOs.

text: In June 2006, Gwyneth Dunwoody, the House of Commons Transport Committee chair, called for an investigation into the companies.[34] Transport commentator Christian Wolmar has asserted the high cost of leasing is due to the way the franchises are distributed to the train operating companies. While the TOCs are negotiating for a franchise they have some freedom to propose different rolling stock options. It is only once they have won the franchise, however, they start negotiating with the ROSCOs. The ROSCO will know the TOC's requirements and also knows the TOC has to obtain a fixed mix of rolling stock which puts the train operating company at a disadvantage in its negotiations with the ROSCO. However, Wolmar considers it a mistake to blame the ROSCOs who are simply behaving as commercial companies always behave. Ultimately the problem for Wolmar is the system – and that is down to the government, who he believes are not prepared to seek a more workable solution.[35]

text: Competition Commission[edit]

text: On 29 November 2006, following a June 2006 complaint by the Department for Transport alleging excessive pricing by the ROSCOs, the Office of Rail Regulation (as it was then called) announced it was minded to refer the operation of the market for passenger rolling stock to the Competition Commission, citing, amongst other factors, problems in the DfT's own franchising policy as responsible for what may be regarded as a dysfunctional market. ORR said it will consult the industry and the public on what to do, and will publish its decision in April 2007. If the ORR does refer the market to the Competition Commission, there may well be a hiatus in investment in new rolling stock whilst the ROSCOs and their parent companies wait to hear what return they will be allowed to make on their train fleets. This could have the unintended consequence of intensifying the problem of overcrowding on some routes because TOCs will be unable to lengthen their trains or acquire new ones if they need the ROSCOs to co-operate in their acquisition or financing. Some commentators have suggested that such an outcome would be detrimental to the public interest. This is especially striking since the National Audit Office, in its November 2006 report on the renewal and upgrade of the West Coast main line, said that the capacity of the trains and the network will be full in the next few years and advocated train lengthening as an important measure to cope with sharply higher passenger numbers.

text: The Competition Commission conducted an investigation and published provisional findings[36] on 7 August 2008. The report was published on 7 April 2009.[37] A press release [38] summarised the recommendations as follows:

text:
introduce longer franchise terms (in the region of 12 to 15 years or longer), which would allow TOCs to realise the benefits and recover the costs of switching to alternative new or used rolling stock over a longer period, which should increase the incentives and ability for TOCs to exercise choice
assess the benefits of alternative new or used rolling stock proposals beyond the franchise term and across other franchises when evaluating franchise bids. This will encourage a wider choice of rolling stock to be considered in franchise proposals, irrespective of franchise length
ensure franchise invitations to tender (ITTs) are specified in such a way franchise bidders are allowed a choice of rolling stock
requiring the ROSCOs to remove non-discrimination requirements from the Codes of Practice, which would provide greater incentives for the TOCs to seek improved terms from the ROSCOs
requiring rolling stock lessors to provide TOCs with a set list of information when making a lease rental offer for used rolling stock, which would give TOCs the ability to negotiate more effectively

tag: ul

text: Leasing companies (ROSCO)[edit]

text: Three companies took over British Rail's rolling stock on privatisation:

text:
Angel Trains - owned by a consortium of private equity investors, mainly comprising pension funds and insurance companies, and has 4,400 vehicles in the UK.
Eversholt Rail Group - owns a fleet of over 4,000 vehicles and is owned by a consortium including 3i Infrastructure and Morgan Stanley.
Porterbrook - leases some 3,500 locomotives, trains and freight wagons; owned by a consortium including Deutsche Bank, Lloyds TSB (who withdrew in October 2010) and BNP Paribas.

text: A number of other companies have since entered the leasing market:

text:
Sovereign Trains - a company that forms part of the same group as the open-access operator Grand Central. Sovereign Trains owned the rolling stock operated by Grand Central.
QW Rail Leasing - a joint venture between the National Australia Bank and SMBC Leasing and Finance to provide the EMU rolling stock to London Overground.
Diesel Trains - in March 2009, the Department for Transport also launched its own ROSCO to order 202 new diesel train carriages for the Thames Valley area, around Bristol and on longer distances in northern England. The trains were due to enter service by 2012 for train operators First Great Western, First TransPennine Express and Northern Rail. However, in August 2009 the order was cancelled due to the planned electrification of the Great Western Main Line and Diesel Trains was later dissolved in July 2012.
Lloyds TSB General Leasing - in April 2009, Lloyds TSB entered the rolling stock market by funding the purchase of 30 new EMU trains for National Express East Anglia.
Beacon Rail Leasing,[39] owns Class 68 and Class 88 locomotives, as well as Class 220 and Class 221 DMUs.[40]
UK Rail Leasing, owns some Class 56 locomotives

text:
[show]

v
t
e

British Rolling Stock Companies (ROSCOs)

Angel Trains
Eversholt Rail Group
Macquarie European Rail
Porterbrook
QW Rail Leasing
Sovereign Trains

text: Spot-hire companies[edit]

text: Spot-hire companies provide short-term leasing of rolling stock.

text:
MiddlePeak Railways, a locomotive hire & lease company with a stock of locomotives similar to Class 08 & NS 0-6-0 600 Class shunting locomotives, other locomotives, rolling stock & parts.[41][42]
GL Railease owned by GATX Capital, and Lombard, a subsidiary of the Royal Bank of Scotland.
Harry Needle Railroad Company Ltd, an industrial and main line locomotive hire and overhaul company. Operates Class 08 shunting locomotives, and Class 20 locomotives.[43]
Riviera Trains, a spot-hire company with a fleet of Class 47 locomotives. This company works closely with DB Cargo UK.[44]
West Coast Railway Company, a spot-hire and railtour-operator with a stock of Class 37 and Class 47 locomotives, as well as the rebuild Class 57 locomotive.

text:
[show]

v
t
e

British railway spot-hire companies

Current

British American Railway Services
Europhoenix
Harry Needle Railroad Company
Nemesis Rail
Rail Operations Group
Riviera Trains
UK Rail Leasing
West Coast Railways

Defunct

Advenza Freight
Cotswold Rail
FM Rail
Hanson Traction
Ian Riley Engineering
Mainline Rail
RT Rail

text: Statutory framework[edit]

text: Railways in Great Britain are in the private sector, but they are subject to control by central government, and to economic and safety regulation by arms of government.

text: In 2006, using powers in the Railways Act 2005, the Department for Transport took over most of the functions of the now wound up Strategic Rail Authority. The DfT now itself runs competitions for the award of passenger rail franchises, and, once awarded, monitors and enforces the contracts with the private sector franchisees. Franchises specify the passenger rail services which are to be run and the quality and other conditions (for example, the cleanliness of trains, station facilities and opening hours, the punctuality and reliability of trains) which the operators have to meet. Some franchises receive a subsidy from the DfT for doing so, and some are cash-positive, which means the franchisee pays the DfT for the contract. Some franchises start life as subsidised and, over their life, move to being cash-positive.

text: The other regulatory authority for the privatised railway is the Office of Rail and Road (previously the Office of Rail Regulation), which, following the Railways Act 2005, is the combined economic and safety regulator. It replaced the Rail Regulator on 5 July 2004. The Rail Safety and Standards Board still exists, however; established in 2003 on the recommendations of a public inquiry, it leads the industry's progress in health and safety matters.

text: The principal modern railway statutes are:

text:
Railways Act 1993
Competition Act 1998 (insofar as it confers competition powers on the Office of Rail and Road)
Transport Act 2000
Railways and Transport Safety Act 2003
Railways Act 2005

text: Railway industry[edit]

text: Statutory authorities[edit]

text:
Office of Rail and Road – Website
Department for Transport – Website
UK Notified Bodies – Website

text: Rail network and signalling operations[edit]

text:
Railtrack (1996–2002)
Network Rail (2002–) – Website – (A "not for dividend" company limited by guarantee)

text: Other national entities[edit]

text:
Association of Train Operating Companies – ATOC – Website
Institution of Railway Operators – Website
Rail Freight Group – Website
Rail Passengers Council and Committees – Website
Rail Safety and Standards Board – RSSB – Website
The Railway Forum – Website
Railway Mission – Website
Railway Study Association – Website

text: Trade unions[edit]

text: The railways are one of the most heavily unionised industrial sectors in the UK.

text:
Associated Society of Locomotive Engineers and Firemen – ASLEF – Website
National Union of Rail, Maritime and Transport Workers – RMT – Website
Transport Salaried Staffs' Association – TSSA – Website

text: Regional entities[edit]

text: See Passenger transport executive

text:
Transport for West Midlands – Website
TfGM (Transport for Greater Manchester) – Website
Merseytravel – Website
Metro (West Yorkshire Metro) – Website
Nexus (Tyne and Wear Passenger Transport Executive) – Website
Travel South Yorkshire (South Yorkshire Passenger Transport Executive) – Website
SPT (Strathclyde Partnership for Transport) – Website
TfL (Transport for London) – Website

text: See List of companies operating trains in the United Kingdom.

text: Freight railway companies[edit]

text:
GB Railfreight – Website
DB Cargo UK – Website
Freightliner – Website
Direct Rail Services – Website
Colas Rail – Website
Devon and Cornwall Railways – Website
Mendip Rail – Website

text: Open access operators and other non-franchised passenger operators[edit]

text:
Eurostar – Website
Grand Central – Website
Heathrow Express – Website
Hull Trains – Website
Venice-Simplon Orient Express (VSOE) – Website

text: Early railway companies (1820s-1840s)[edit]

text: This is only the earliest of the main line openings: for a more comprehensive list of the hundreds of early railways see List of early British railway companies

text:
Stockton and Darlington Railway (1825) - First steam-hauled passenger railway in the world.
Canterbury and Whitstable Railway (1830) - First steam-hauled passenger railway to issue season tickets.
Liverpool and Manchester Railway (1830) - First InterCity passenger railway.
Grand Junction Railway (1833) - The line built by the company was the first trunk railway to be completed in England, and arguably the world's first long-distance railway with steam traction.
London and Greenwich Railway (1836) - First steam railway in the capital, the first to be built specifically for passengers, and the first elevated railway.
London and Birmingham Railway (1837) - First Intercity line to be built into London.
Midland Counties Railway (1839)
Birmingham and Derby Junction Railway (BDJR) (1839)
North Midland Railway (1840)
Taff Vale Railway (1840)

text: Heritage and private railways[edit]

text: Many lines closed by British Railways, including many closed during the Beeching cuts, have been restored and reopened as heritage railways. A few have been relaid as narrow-gauge but the majority are standard-gauge. Most use both steam and diesel locomotives for haulage. Most heritage railways are operated as tourist attractions and do not provide regular year-round train services.

text: Railway re-opening[edit]

text: Several pressure groups are campaigning for the re-opening of closed railway lines in Great Britain. These include:

text:
Ashington–Bedlington–Newcastle[45]
Marlow Branch (Bourne End–High Wycombe)[46]
Cambridge–Oxford, East West Rail[47] This project was approved by the Government in November 2011.
Colne–Skipton, Skipton-East Lancashire Rail Action Partnership[48]
South Staffordshire Line (Stourbridge–Walsall)
Wealden Line (Uckfield–Lewes)[49]
Woodhead Line (Hadfield–Penistone)
York to Beverley Line (York–Beverley)
Peak Rail: (Matlock–Bakewell). Under-funded line.
Great Central Railway Notts–Leicester
Portishead Railway from Portishead to Bristol Temple Meads
St Andrews Rail Link (Leuchars–St Andrews)

text: From 1995 until 2009, 27 new lines (totalling 199 track miles) and 68 stations were opened, with 65 further new station sites identified by Network Rail or government for possible construction.[50] On 15 June 2009 the Association of Train Operating Companies (ATOC) published the report Connecting Communities: Expanding Access to the Rail Network, detailing schemes around England where it believed there was a commercial business case for passenger network expansion. The published proposals involved the re-opening or new construction of 40 stations, serving communities with populations of over 15,000, including 14 schemes involving the re-opening or reconstruction of rail lines for passenger services. These would be short-lead-time local projects, to be completed in timescales ranging from 2 years 9 months to 6 years, once approved by local and regional governments, Network Rail and the Department for Transport, complementing existing long-term national projects.[51][52]

text: Rail link(s) with adjacent countries[edit]

text:
Great Britain (standard-gauge)

 France (Eurostar) via the Channel Tunnel
formerly by Train ferries.
 Belgium (Eurostar) via France using the Channel Tunnel.

text: Rail-ferry-rail services[edit]

text:
Netherlands - Dutchflyer rail/sea/rail service
 Ireland - Sail Rail service[53]