document_title: Financial and social rankings of sovereign states in Europe

question_text: which country has the largest economy in europe

text: Definition of Europe[edit]

text: For the purposes of comparison the broader definition of Europe will be used. A sovereign state must meet at least one of the following criteria to be included:

text:
Be a recognised European state by the United Nations geoscheme for Europe
Be a member state of the European Union
Be a member state of the Eurozone
Be a member state of the Council of Europe

text: Economic[edit]

text: Countries by GDP (nominal)[edit]

text: Data provided is by the International Monetary Fund (2013)[1]

text:
Rank
Country
GDP (Millions of US$)

 European Union[n 1]
17,512,109

1
 Germany
3,635,959

2
 France
2,807,306

3
 United Kingdom
2,523,216

4
 Russia
2,096,774[n 2]

5
 Italy
2,071,955

6
 Spain
1,358,687

7
 Netherlands
853,806

8
 Turkey
819,990

9
  Switzerland
650,431

10
 Sweden
558,949

11
 Poland
517,705

12
 Norway
512,581

13
 Belgium
508,275

14
 Austria
416,062

15
 Denmark
330,614

16
 Finland
267,412

17
 Greece
241,796

18
 Ireland
232,150

19
 Portugal
220,062

20
 Czech Republic
198,450

21
 Romania
188,893

22
 Ukraine
178,313

23
 Hungary
132,260

24
 Slovakia
95,805

25
 Azerbaijan
73,537

26
 Belarus
71,710

27
 Luxembourg
60,402

28
 Croatia
57,371

29
 Bulgaria
53,046

30
 Slovenia
48,005

31
 Lithuania
46,507

32
 Serbia
42,492

33
 Latvia
30,953

34
 Estonia
24,888

35
 Cyprus
21,919

36
 Bosnia and Herzegovina
17,828

37
 Georgia
16,162

38
 Iceland
14,656

39
 Albania
12,724

40
 Armenia
10.431

41
 Macedonia
10,238

42
 Malta
9,545

43
 Moldova
7,935

44
 Monaco
6,075[n 3]

45
 Liechtenstein
4,826[n 3]

46
 Montenegro
4,377

47
 Andorra
3,712[n 3]

48
 San Marino
1,802

text: Projected GDP (nominal)[edit]

text: Data provided is from December 2014 update by the Centre for Economics and Business Research. [2]

text:
2019

Rank
Country
GDP (Millions of US$)

1
 Germany
3,519,000

2
 United Kingdom
2,953,000

3
 France
2,666,000

4
 Russia
2,246,000

5
 Italy
1,936,000

6
 Spain
1,242,000

7
 Turkey
1,052,000

8
  Switzerland
816,000

9
 Sweden
788,000

10
 Netherlands
766,000

2024

Rank
Country
GDP (Millions of US$)

1
 Germany
3,953,000

2
 United Kingdom
3,645,000

3
 France
3,039,000

4
 Russia
2,816,000

5
 Italy
2,155,000

6
 Turkey
1,564,000

7
 Spain
1,382,000

8
 Sweden
1,067,000

9
 Poland
975,000

10
  Switzerland
966,000

text:
2029

Rank
Country
GDP (Millions of US$)

1
 Germany
4,324,000

2
 United Kingdom
4,281,000

3
 France
3,395,000

4
 Russia
3,295,000

5
 Italy
2,356,000

6
 Turkey
2,343,000

7
 Spain
1,513,000

8
 Sweden
1,438,000

9
 Poland
1,284,000

10
  Switzerland
1,137,000

2030

Rank
Country
GDP (Millions of US$)

1
 United Kingdom
4,421,000

2
 Germany
4,397,000

3
 France
3,469,000

4
 Russia
3,383,000

5
 Turkey
2,547,000

6
 Italy
2,397,000

7
 Spain
1,540,000

8
 Sweden
1,526,000

9
 Poland
1,357,000

10
  Switzerland
1,175,000

text: GDP growth rate[edit]

text: The real GDP growth rates provided are the 2015 estimates (unless otherwise indicated) as recorded in the CIA World Factbook.[3]

text:
Rank
Country
Real GDP growth rate (%)

1
 Monaco
9.30 (2013 est.)

2
 Ireland
7.80

3
 Malta
5.40

4
 Luxembourg
4.50

5
 Czech Republic
4.20

6
 Montenegro
4.10

7
 Sweden
4.10

8
 Iceland
4.00

9
 Turkey
3.80

10
 Romania
3.70

11
 Macedonia
3.70

12
 Slovakia
3.60

13
 Poland
3.60

14
 Spain
3.20

15
 Armenia
3.00

16
 Bulgaria
3.00

17
 Slovenia
2.90

18
 Hungary
2.90

19
 Bosnia and Herzegovina
2.80

20
 Georgia
2.80

21
 Latvia
2.70

22
 Albania
2.60

23
 United Kingdom
2.20

24
 Netherlands
1.90

25
 Liechtenstein
1.80

26
 Lithuania
1.60

27
 Norway
1.60

28
 Cyprus
1.60

29
 Croatia
1.60

30
 Germany
1.50

31
 Portugal
1.50

32
 Belgium
1.40

33
 Denmark
1.20

34
 France
1.10

35
 Estonia
1.10

36
 Azerbaijan
1.10

37
 San Marino
1.00

38
  Switzerland
0.90

39
 Austria
0.90

40
 Italy
0.80

41
 Serbia
0.70

42
 Finland
0.40

43
 Greece
-0.20

44
 Moldova
-1.10

45
 Andorra
-1.60

46
 Russia
-3.70

47
 Belarus
-3.90

48
 Ukraine
-9.90

text: GDP (nominal) per capita[edit]

text: The GDP (nominal) per capita values provided are the 2013 figures (unless otherwise indicated) as recorded in the CIA World Factbook.[4]

text:
Rank
Country
GDP per capita (US$)

1
 Monaco
159,400

2
 Liechtenstein
139,300

3
 Luxembourg
110,700

4
 Norway
101,400

5
  Switzerland
80,800

6
 Denmark
58,300

7
 San Marino
57,900

8
 Sweden
57,200

9
 Finland
49,200

10
 Austria
49,100

11
 Netherlands
47,600

12
 Andorra
46,418[n 4]

13
 Iceland
46,200

14
 Ireland
46,000

15
 Belgium
45,600

16
 Germany
44,300

17
 France
41,700

18
 United Kingdom
39,600

 European Union[n 1]
34,000

19
 Italy
33,600

20
 Spain
28,600

21
 Cyprus
25,200

22
 Slovenia
22,700

23
 Malta
22,600

24
 Greece
21,800

25
 Portugal
21,000

26
 Czech Republic
18,861[n 4]

27
 Estonia
18,300

28
 Slovakia
17,700

29
 Latvia
15,400

30
 Lithuania
15,300

31
 Russia
14,600

32
 Croatia
13,400

33
 Poland
13,300

34
 Hungary
13,100

35
 Turkey
10,700

36
 Romania
8,900

37
 Azerbaijan
7,900

38
 Belarus
7,500

39
 Bulgaria
7,300

40
 Montenegro
6,800

41
 Serbia
6,000

42
 Macedonia
5,000

43
 Bosnia and Herzegovina
4,800

44
 Albania
4,400

45
 Ukraine
3,800

46
 Georgia
3,600

47
 Armenia
3,400

48
 Moldova
2,200

text: GDP (PPP)[edit]

text: Data provided is by the International Monetary Fund (2013)[5]

text:
Rank
Country
GDP (Billions of US$)

 European Union[n 1]
17,578.4

1
 Germany
3,512.8

2
 Russia
3,491.6

3
 France
2,534.5

4
 United Kingdom
2,320.4

5
 Italy
2,035.4

6
 Spain
1,488.8

7
 Turkey
1,443.5

8
 Poland
896.8

9
 Netherlands
780.3

10
 Belgium
455.0

11
  Switzerland
432.0

12
 Sweden
418.2

13
 Ukraine
392.5

14
 Austria
376.7

15
 Romania
371.2

16
 Norway
328.0

17
 Czech Republic
287.6

18
 Greece
278.0

19
 Portugal
268.8

20
 Denmark
240.9

21
 Hungary
229.6

22
 Finland
218.3

23
 Ireland
213.3

24
 Belarus
166.8

25
 Azerbaijan
158.5

26
 Slovakia
144.0

27
 Bulgaria
119.6

28
 Serbia
89.7

29
 Croatia
86.6

30
 Lithuania
75.4

31
 Slovenia
58.7

32
 Luxembourg
48.5

33
 Latvia
46.5

34
 Bosnia and Herzegovina
37.1

35
 Estonia
34.4

36
 Georgia
32.1

37
 Albania
29.5

38
 Macedonia
26.1

39
 Cyprus
25.3

40
 Armenia
23.1

41
 Moldova
16.6

42
 Iceland
13.2

43
 Malta
12.9

44
 Montenegro
9.10

45
 Monaco
5.74 (2011 est.)[n 5]

46
 Liechtenstein
3.20 (2009 est.)[n 5]

47
 Andorra
3.16 (2012 est.)[n 5]

48
 San Marino
1.97

text: Net National Wealth[edit]

text: The top 15 estimates are part of the 2014 data by Credit Suisse.[6]

text:
Rank
Country
GDP (Billions of US$)

1
 France
15,304

2
 United Kingdom
14,157

3
 Germany
14,156

4
 Italy
12,580

5
 Spain
5,033

6
  Switzerland
3,554

7
 Netherlands
2,722

8
 Belgium
2,529

9
 Sweden
2,436

10
 Russia
2,156

11
 Austria
1,529

12
 Norway
1,345

13
 Denmark
1,230

14
 Turkey
1,061

15
 Greece
1,015

text: Financial[edit]

text: Current account balance[edit]

text: The current account balance values provided are the 2013 figures (unless otherwise indicated) as recorded in the CIA World Factbook.[7] Figures for Andorra, Liechtenstein, Monaco and San Marino are unavailable.

text:
Rank
Country
Current Account Balance (US$)

1
 Germany
257,100,000,000

2
 Russia
74,800,000,000 (2012 est.)

3
 Norway
67,400,000,000

4
 Netherlands
65,870,000,000

5
  Switzerland
65,600,000,000

6
 Sweden
39,000,000,000

7
 Denmark
19,600,000,000

8
 Azerbaijan
13,280,000,000

9
 Austria
10,600,000,000

10
 Ireland
7,300,000,000

11
 Slovakia
3,315,000,000

12
 Slovenia
2,954,000,000

13
 Luxembourg
2,700,000,000

14
 Spain
2,100,000,000

15
 Greece
2,021,000,000

16
 Hungary
1,722,000,000

17
 Portugal
1,000,000,000

18
 Malta
133,100,000

19
 Iceland
-100,000,000

20
 Croatia
-102,300,000

21
 Bulgaria
-182,300,000

22
 Macedonia
-194,100,000

23
 Estonia
-352,300,000

24
 Cyprus
-358,200,000

25
 Moldova
-507,700,000

26
 Lithuania
-567,000,000

27
 Latvia
-613,900,000

28
 Armenia
-720,600,000

29
 Bosnia and Herzegovina
-939,500,000

30
 Albania
-1,280,000,000

31
 Georgia
-1,375,000,000

32
 Serbia
-1,807,000,000

33
 Montenegro
-1,938,000,000 (2012 est.)

34
 Romania
-1,986,000,000

35
 Finland
-2,000,000,000

36
 Italy
-2,400,000,000

37
 Czech Republic
-3,270,000,000

38
 Belarus
-4,245,000,000

39
 Belgium
-9,100,000,000

40
 Poland
-11,060,000,000

41
 Ukraine
-11,920,000,000

 European Union[n 1]
-34,490,000,000 (2011 est.)

42
 Turkey
-58,350,000,000

43
 France
-58,970,000,000

44
 United Kingdom
-93,600,000,000

text: Public debt[edit]

text: The public debt values provided are the 2013 figures (unless otherwise indicated) as recorded in the CIA World Factbook.[8] Figures for Liechtenstein and Monaco are unavailable.

text:
Rank
Country
Public Debt (% of GDP)

1
 Greece
175.00

2
 Italy
133.00

3
 Iceland
130.50

4
 Portugal
127.80

5
 Ireland
124.20

6
 Cyprus
113.10

7
 Belgium
102.40

8
 Spain
93.70

9
 France
93.40

10
 United Kingdom
91.10

11
 Germany
79.90

12
 Hungary
79.80

13
 Austria
75.70

14
 Malta
75.30

15
 Netherlands
74.30

16
 Slovenia
71.70

17
 Albania
70.50

18
 Croatia
66.20

19
 Serbia
61.20

20
 Finland
56.50

21
 Slovakia
55.50

22
 Montenegro
52.10 (2012 est.)

23
 Czech Republic
48.80

24
 Poland
48.20

25
 Denmark
47.00

26
 Bosnia and Herzegovina
45.90

27
 Sweden
41.50

28
 Andorra
41.10 (2012)

29
 Ukraine
40.60

30
 Lithuania
40.20

31
 Latvia
39.20

32
 Romania
38.60

33
 Armenia
37.70

34
 Turkey
36.60

35
 Georgia
36.30 (2012 est.)

36
 Macedonia
34.30

37
  Switzerland
33.80

38
 Belarus
31.50

39
 Norway
30.10

40
 San Marino
25.80

41
 Luxembourg
22.90

42
 Bulgaria
18.40

43
 Moldova
16.60

44
 Russia
7.90

45
 Azerbaijan
7.50

46
 Estonia
6.00

text: Unemployment rate[edit]

text: The unemployment rate values provided are the most recent figures provided by varying sources, namely data released by state Governments.

text:
Rank
Country
Unemployment Rate (%)

1
 Belarus
0.5 (2013)[n 6]

2
 Monaco
2.0 (2012)

3
 Liechtenstein
2.5 (2011)

4
 Andorra
2.9 (2013)

5
  Switzerland
3.1 (2012)

6
 Norway
3.4 (2014)

7
 Austria
4.8 (2014)[n 7]

8
 Netherlands
4.9 (2017)

9
 Germany
5.1 (2014)

10
 Russia
5.2 (2013)

11
 Iceland
5.4 (2013)

12
 Azerbaijan
5.7 (2012)

13
 United Kingdom
6.0 (2014)

14
 Luxembourg
6.1 (2014)

15
 Ireland
6.4(2017)

16
 Czech Republic
6.7 (2014)

17
 Malta
6.9 (2014)

18
 Denmark
7.0 (2014)

19
 San Marino
7.0 (2012)

20
 Hungary
7.1 (2014)

21
 Romania
7.2 (2014)

22
 Sweden
8.1 (2014)

23
 Finland
8.2 (2014)

24
 Belgium
8.5 (2014)

25
 Estonia
8.7 (2013)

26
 Turkey
8.8 (2014)

27
 Moldova
9.1 (2010)

28
 Ukraine
9.2 (2009)

29
 Poland
9.7 (2014)

30
 Slovenia
9.8 (2014)

31
 France
10.4 (2014)

 European Union[n 1]
10.6 (2014)

32
 Lithuania
11.5 (2014)

33
 Latvia
11.6 (2013)

34
 Italy
12.6 (2014)

35
 Bulgaria
13.1 (2014)

36
 Georgia
13.7 (2014)

37
 Slovakia
13.9 (2014)

38
 Montenegro
15.0 (2013)

39
 Cyprus
15.3 (2014)

40
 Portugal
15.3 (2014)

41
 Albania
16.9 (2013)

42
 Armenia
17.3 (2013)

43
 Croatia
17.6 (2014)

44
 Serbia
20.8 (2014)

45
 Spain
25.6 (2014)

46
 Greece
25.9 (2014)

47
 Bosnia and Herzegovina
27.0 (2013)

48
 Macedonia
28.4 (2014)

text: Average wage[edit]

text: The average wage values provided are 2014 figures (unless otherwise stated) as recorded by varying sources, namely releases by respective Governments. The values are for monthly average wage (annual wage divided by 12 months) for net income (after taxes) in Euro currency.

text:
Rank
Country
Net wage (Euro €)

1
 Liechtenstein
6,003 (2010)

2
  Switzerland
5,049 (2011)

3
 Monaco
4,436 (2012)

4
 Norway
4,424 (2013)

5
 Luxembourg
3,189 (2010)

6
 Denmark
3,122 (2012)

7
 Sweden
2,835

8
 United Kingdom
2,723 (2013)

9
 San Marino
2,390 (2013)

10
 Finland
2,330

11
 Iceland
2,253

12
 Andorra
2,230 (2012)

13
 Ireland
2,160 (2013)

14
 Netherlands
2,136 (2012)

15
 France
2,128 (2011)

16
 Austria
2,114 (2012)

17
 Germany
2,054 (2013)

18
 Belgium
1,946 (2013)

19
 Italy
1,923

20
 Cyprus
1,833 (2013)

21
 Spain
1,734 (2013)

22
 Malta
1,092 (2013)

23
 Slovenia
1,044 (2012)

24
 Greece
1,004 (2013)

25
 Portugal
985

26
 Estonia
903(2015)

27
 Poland
739

28
 Croatia
710

29
 Czech Republic
702

30
 Slovakia
647

31
 Turkey
632 (2012)

32
 Latvia
566

33
 Lithuania
541

34
 Hungary
487

35
 Montenegro
486 (2013)

36
 Bosnia and Herzegovina
423 (2013)

37
 Azerbaijan
402

38
 Romania
398 (2013)

39
 Georgia
385 (2013)

40
 Russia
378

41
 Serbia
373

42
 Macedonia
353

43
 Bulgaria
332 (2013)

44
 Belarus
327 (2015)

45
 Albania
320 (2013)

46
 Armenia
232

47
 Moldova
199

48
 Ukraine
162 (2015)

text: Minimum wage[edit]

text: The minimum wage figures provided are the 2013 figures by The Federation of International Employers. Currency conversions from non-Euro currencies being based on the exchange rates of 2012.[9]

text:
Rank
Country
Monthly minimum (Euro €)

1
 Luxembourg
1,921

2
 Monaco
1,593

3
 San Marino
1,525

4
 Netherlands
1,502

5
 Germany
1,473

6
 Belgium
1,472

7
 Ireland
1,462

8
 United Kingdom
1,461

9
 France
1,458

10
 Andorra
962

11
 Slovenia
789

12
 Malta
703

13
 Spain
649

14
 Greece
586

15
 Portugal
505

16
 Estonia
430

17
 Turkey
425

18
 Poland
400

19
 Croatia
392

20
 Slovakia
380

21
 Latvia
360

22
 Hungary
339

23
 Czech Republic
332

24
 Lithuania
300

25
 Romania
228

26
 Macedonia
203

27
 Montenegro
193

28
 Bulgaria
184

29
 Serbia
173

30
 Bosnia and Herzegovina
164

31
 Albania
154

32
 Belarus
126

33
 Azerbaijan
120

34
 Armenia
95

35
 Moldova
94

36
 Russia
83

37
 Ukraine
67

38
 Georgia
40

text: Social[edit]

text: Human Development Index[edit]

text: The Human Development Index values provided are the 2014 estimates for 2013 (unless otherwise stated), as included in the United Nations Development Programme's Human Development Report.[10]

text:
Rank
Country
HDI
Change

1
 San Marino
0.961 (2008)
N/A

2
 Monaco
0.956 (2008)
N/A

3
 Norway
0.944
 0.001

4
  Switzerland
0.917
 0.001

5
 Netherlands
0.915

6
 Germany
0.911

7
 Denmark
0.900

8
 Ireland
0.899
 0.002

9
 Sweden
0.898
 0.001

10
 Iceland
0.895
 0.002

11
 United Kingdom
0.892
 0.002

12
 Liechtenstein
0.889
 0.001

13
 France
0.884

14
 Austria
0.881
 0.001

15
 Belgium
0.881
 0.001

16
 Luxembourg
0.881
 0.001

17
 Finland
0.879

18
 Slovenia
0.874

19
 Italy
0.872

20
 Spain
0.869

21
 Czech Republic
0.861

22
 Greece
0.853
 0.001

23
 Cyprus
0.845
 0.003

24
 Estonia
0.840
 0.001

25
 Lithuania
0.834
 0.003

26
 Poland
0.834
 0.001

27
 Andorra
0.830

28
 Slovakia
0.830
 0.001

29
 Malta
0.829
 0.002

30
 Portugal
0.822

31
 Hungary
0.818
 0.001

32
 Croatia
0.812

33
 Latvia
0.810
 0.002

34
 Montenegro
0.789
 0.002

35
 Belarus
0.786
 0.001

36
 Romania
0.785
 0.003

37
 Russia
0.778
 0.001

38
 Bulgaria
0.777
 0.001

39
 Turkey
0.759
 0.003

40
 Azerbaijan
0.747
 0.002

41
 Serbia
0.745
 0.002

42
 Georgia
0.744
 0.003

43
 Ukraine
0.734
 0.001

44
 Macedonia
0.732
 0.002

45
 Bosnia and Herzegovina
0.731
 0.002

46
 Armenia
0.730
 0.002

47
 Albania
0.716
 0.002

48
 Moldova
0.663
 0.006

text: Percentage living below poverty line[edit]

text: The percentage figures for citizens living below the poverty line are the latest available as provided by either the CIA World Factbook or the World Bank.[11][12][13] There is no data available for eleven European states.

text:
Rank
Country
Percentage
Year

1
 Lithuania
4.0
2008

2
 Norway
4.3
2007

3
 Ireland
5.5
2009

4
 Latvia
5.9
2004

5
 Austria
6.0
2008

5
 Azerbaijan
6.0
2012

7
 France
6.2
2004

8
  Switzerland
6.9
2010

9
 Belarus
7.3
2011

10
 Poland
7.6
2008

11
 Ukraine
7.8
2011

12
 Czech Republic
8.6
2012

13
 Serbia
9.1
2013

14
 Netherlands
10.5
2005

15
 Montenegro
11.3
2012

16
 Slovenia
12.3
2008

17
 Russia
12.7
2011

18
 Slovakia
13.2
2011

19
 Denmark
13.4
2011

20
 Hungary
13.9
2010

21
 United Kingdom
14.0
2006

22
 Albania
14.3
2012

23
 Belgium
15.2
2007

24
 Germany
15.5
2010

25
 Moldova
16.6
2012

26
 Turkey
16.9
2010

27
 Estonia
17.5
2010

28
 Georgia
17.7
2011

29
 Bosnia and Herzegovina
17.9
2011

30
 Croatia
18.0
2009

30
 Portugal
18.0
2006

32
 Spain
19.8
2005

33
 Greece
20.0
2009

34
 Bulgaria
20.7
2009

35
 Romania
22.2
2011

36
 Macedonia
27.1
2010

37
 Armenia
34.1
2009

text: Social Progress Index[edit]

text: The Social Progress Index figures are provided by the nonprofit Social Progress Imperative and represent 2014. Eight European states are not represented as data is not available.[14]

text:
Rank
Country
Social Progress Index

1
  Switzerland
88.19

2
 Iceland
88.07

3
 Netherlands
87.37

4
 Norway
87.12

5
 Sweden
87.08

6
 Finland
86.91

7
 Denmark
86.55

8
 Austria
85.11

9
 Germany
84.61

10
 United Kingdom
84.56

11
 Ireland
84.05

12
 Belgium
82.63

13
 Slovenia
81.65

14
 Estonia
81.65

15
 France
81.10

16
 Spain
80.77

17
 Portugal
80.49

18
 Czech Republic
80.41

19
 Slovakia
78.93

20
 Poland
77.44

21
 Italy
76.93

22
 Latvia
73.91

23
 Hungary
73.87

24
 Lithuania
73.76

25
 Greece
73.43

26
 Croatia
73.31

27
 Serbia
70.61

28
 Bulgaria
70.24

29
 Albania
69.13

30
 Macedonia
68.33

31
 Romania
67.72

32
 Montenegro
66.80

33
 Belarus
65.20

34
 Armenia
65.03

35
 Bosnia and Herzegovina
64.99

36
 Ukraine
64.91

37
 Turkey
64.62

38
 Georgia
63.94

39
 Azerbaijan
62.44

40
 Russia
60.79

41
 Moldova
60.12

text: Opportunity[edit]

text: The Opportunity figures are included in the 2014 Social Progress Index by the nonprofit Social Progress Imperative. Eight European states are not represented as data is not available[14]

text:
Rank
Country
Opportunity

1
 Ireland
82.63

2
 United Kingdom
82.29

3
 Sweden
81.95

4
 Finland
81.92

5
 Iceland
81.71

6
 Norway
80.82

7
 Netherlands
80.63

8
  Switzerland
79.92

9
 Denmark
79.10

10
 Belgium
76.34

11
 Germany
75.81

12
 Spain
75.19

13
 Portugal
74.43

14
 Austria
74.42

15
 France
72.72

16
 Estonia
72.32

17
 Slovenia
69.3

18
 Italy
66.58

19
 Poland
66.50

20
 Czech Republic
66.21

21
 Hungary
63.46

22
 Slovakia
63.04

23
 Lithuania
61.84

24
 Latvia
59.85

25
 Greece
58.45

26
 Bulgaria
56.98

27
 Ukraine
55.33

28
 Macedonia
55.23

29
 Romania
54.91

30
 Croatia
54.88

31
 Albania
54.14

32
 Serbia
52.87

33
 Montenegro
52.48

34
 Georgia
49.07

35
 Moldova
48.04

36
 Turkey
47.41

37
 Armenia
47.39

38
 Bosnia and Herzegovina
46.93

39
 Russia
46.58

40
 Belarus
44.13

41
 Azerbaijan
42.54

text: World Happiness Report[edit]

text: The World Happiness Report is a measure of happiness published by the United Nations Sustainable Development Solutions Network, with the figures provided being the 2013 edition for the 2010 to 2012 period.[15]

text:
Rank
Country
Happiness
Change in happiness (2005-2006)

1
 Denmark
7.693
 -0.233

2
 Norway
7.655
 0.263

3
  Switzerland
7.650
 0.303

4
 Netherlands
7.512
 0.054

5
 Sweden
7.480
 0.171

6
 Finland
7.389
 -0.283

7
 Austria
7.369
 0.247

8
 Iceland
7.355
N/A

9
 Ireland
7.076
 -0.068

10
 Luxembourg
7.054
N/A

11
 Belgium
6.967
 -0.274

12
 United Kingdom
6.883
 -0.003

13
 France
6.764
 -0.049

14
 Germany
6.672
 0.163

15
 Cyprus
6.466
 0.228

16
 Spain
6.322
 -0.750

17
 Czech Republic
6.290
 -0.180

18
 Slovenia
6.060
 0.249

19
 Italy
6.021
 -0.691

20
 Slovakia
5.969
 0.705

21
 Malta
5.964
N/A

22
 Poland
5.822
 0.085

23
 Moldova
5.791
 0.852

24
 Croatia
5.661
 -0.160

25
 Albania
5.550
 0.915

26
 Belarus
5.504
 -0.133

27
 Russia
5.464
 0.346

28
 Greece
5.435
 -0.891

29
 Lithuania
5.426
 -0.456

30
 Estonia
5.426
 0.074

31
 Turkey
5.344
 0.171

32
 Montenegro
5.299
 0.103

33
 Portugal
5.101
 -0.305

34
 Ukraine
5.057
 0.032

35
 Latvia
5.046
 0.358

36
 Romania
5.033
 -0.186

37
 Serbia
4.813
 0.063

38
 Bosnia and Herzegovina
4.813
 -0.087

39
 Hungary
4.775
 -0.300

40
 Azerbaijan
4.604
 -0.045

41
 Macedonia
4.574
 0.081

42
 Armenia
4.316
 -0.269

43
 Georgia
4.187
 0.496

44
 Bulgaria
3.981
 0.137

text: Summary[edit]

text: Economic[edit]

text:
Azerbaijan is the second fastest growing economy in Europe, and the fastest growing transcontinental economy
 Cyprus is the weakest growing economy in Europe, the European Union, the Eurozone and the European members of the Commonwealth of Nations
 France has the highest Net National Wealth of any European state
 Germany is the current largest economy in Europe, the European Union and the Eurozone, with Germany remaining the Eurozone's largest economy even once the United Kingdom has surpassed Germany to become Europe's largest economy
 Latvia is the fastest growing economy in both the Eurozone and the European Union
 Luxembourg is home to the highest GDP (nominal) per capita in both the European Union and Eurozone
 Malta is the smallest economy in the Eurozone as well as the European Union, and is the fastest growing European economy in the Commonwealth of Nations
 Moldova is the fastest growing economy in Europe, but is also one of Europe's poorest countries, with the lowest GDP (nominal) per capita of any European state
 Monaco has the highest GDP (nominal) per capita of any European state
 Russia is the largest transcontinental European economy and will remain so until at least 2030
 San Marino is Europe's smallest economy, and is also the third weakest growing economy in Europe
 United Kingdom is the largest European economy in the Commonwealth of Nations, and is also the largest none Eurozone economy in Europe, with the UK set to surpass Germany to become Europe's largest economy by 2030

text: Financial[edit]

text:
Austria has the lowest unemployment rate in the European Union and the Eurozone
 Belarus has the lowest unemployment rate in Europe, although this figure includes underemployment
 Bulgaria has the smallest average wage and monthly minimum wage in the European Union
 Estonia has the smallest public debt (as a percentage of GDP) of any state in Europe, as well as in the European Union and Eurozone
 France has the largest financial deficit of any state in the Eurozone
 Georgia has the lowest monthly minimum wage in Europe
 Germany has the largest financial surplus of any country in Europe as well as the remainder of the world
 Greece has the highest public debt (as a percentage of GDP) of any European state, as well as having the largest unemployment rate in the European Union and Eurozone
 Macedonia has the highest unemployment rate of any European state
 Liechtenstein has the highest average wage of any state in Europe
 Lithuania has the smallest average wage and monthly minimum wage in the Eurozone
 Luxembourg has the highest average wage in the European Union and Eurozone as well as the highest monthly minimum wage in the entirety of Europe
 Russia has the largest surplus of those European countries not a member of either (or both) the EU or Eurozone
 Ukraine has the smallest average wage in Europe, mostly as a result of ongoing political and military struggles
 United Kingdom has the largest deficit of any country in Europe and the European Union

text: Social[edit]

text:
Armenia has the largest percentage living under the poverty line of any state in Europe
 Azerbaijan has the smallest rating for Opportunity in Europe
 Bulgaria has the lowest Human Development Index figure in the European Union, as well as the largest percentage living under the poverty line in the EU, along with ranking last on the Social Progress Index in the EU, and being ranked last on the World Happiness Index in Europe
 Croatia has the smallest rating for Opportunity in the European Union
 Denmark ranks highest on the World Happiness Report in Europe and the European Union
 Greece has the largest percentage living under the poverty line in the Eurozone, and is also ranked last on the Social Progress Index among Eurozone members, including for Opportunity
 Ireland has the highest rating for Opportunity in Europe, the European Union and the Eurozone
 Latvia has the weakest Human Development Index and World Happiness Index figures in the Eurozone
 Lithuania has the smallest percentage living below the poverty line in Europe
 Moldova ranks lowest on the Human Development Index and Social Progress Index in Europe
 Netherlands has highest Human Development Index figure in the European Union and the Eurozone, and also ranks first in the EU and Eurozone on the Social Progress Index, as well as being the highest ranked country in the Eurozone on the World Happiness Index
 San Marino has the highest Human Development Index figure in Europe
  Switzerland ranks highest in Europe on the Social Progress Index

text: Notes[edit]

text:
^ Jump up to: a b c d e The European Union (EU) is an economic and political union of 28 member states that are located primarily in Europe. As the EU is not a country, it is not ranked on this list.
Jump up ^ Excludes data for the Republic of Crimea and Sevastopol.
^ Jump up to: a b c As data by the IMF is unavailable, 2013 data by the World Bank is used.
^ Jump up to: a b As data by the CIA World Factbook is unavailable, 2013 data by the World Bank is used.
^ Jump up to: a b c As data by the IMF is unavailable, the latest available data by the CIA World Factbook is used.
Jump up ^ Data for Belorussian unemployment does not take into account underemployment.
Jump up ^ Data for Austrian unemployment includes only those who were previously employed.


document_title: I Wanna Fall in Love

question_text: who sings i wanna fall in love with you

question_tokens: who sings i wan na fall in love with you

root

text: I Wanna Fall in Love

text: For the Chris Isaak song that contains the lyric "I wanna fall in love", see Wicked Game.

tag: p

text:
"I Wanna Fall in Love"

Single by Lila McCann

from the album Lila

Released
September 1997

Genre
Country

Length
4:19

Label
Asylum

Songwriter(s)
Buddy Brock
Mark Spiro

Producer(s)
Mark Spiro

Lila McCann singles chronology

"Down Came a Blackbird"
(1997)
"I Wanna Fall in Love"
(1997)
"Almost Over You"
(1998)

"Down Came a Blackbird"
(1997)
"I Wanna Fall in Love"
(1997)
"Almost Over You"
(1998)

tag: table

text: "I Wanna Fall in Love" is a song written by Buddy Brock and Mark Spiro, and recorded by American country music artist Lila McCann. It was released in September 1997 as the second single from her debut album Lila. The song reached number 3 on the Billboard Hot Country Singles & Tracks chart in February 1998[1] and number 1 on the RPM Country Tracks chart in Canada.[2]

text: Chart performance[edit]

text:
Chart (1997–1998)
Peak
position

Canada Country Tracks (RPM)[3]
1

US Hot Country Songs (Billboard)[4]
3

text: Year-end charts[edit]

text:
Chart (1998)
Position

Canada Country Tracks (RPM)[5]
50

US Country Songs (Billboard)[6]
29

text:
Preceded by
"Walk This Road"
by Bruce Guthro
RPM Country Tracks
number-one single
February 23, 1998
Succeeded by
"What If I Said"
by Anita Cochran with Steve Wariner


document_title: Harry Coover

question_text: super glue was discovered by accident during development research on what

text: Harry Coover

text: Life and career[edit]

text: Coover was born in Newark, Delaware, and received his Bachelor of Science from Hobart College before earning his Master of Science and Ph. D. from Cornell University. He worked as a chemist for Eastman Kodak from 1944–1973 and as Vice President of the company from 1973-1984.[1] He later moved to Kingsport, Tennessee,[3] where he spent the rest of his life.

text: Superglue[edit]

text: In 1942, while searching for materials to make clear plastic gun sights, Coover and his team at Eastman Kodak examined cyanoacrylates, a material that was used during both World Wars (1914-1918; 1939-1945) as an alternative to stitches on large cuts and wounds,[citation needed] rejecting them as too sticky. Nine years later, Coover was overseeing Kodak chemists investigating heat-resistant polymers for jet canopies when cyanoacrylates were once again tested and proved too sticky. That time around, however, Coover recognized that he had discovered a unique adhesive. In 1958, the adhesive, marketed by Kodak as Super Glue, was introduced for sale.[4]

text: Generally, cyanoacrylate is an acrylic resin which rapidly polymerises in the presence of water (specifically hydroxide ions), forming long, strong chains, joining the bonded surfaces together. Because the presence of moisture causes the glue to set, exposure to moisture in the air can cause a tube or bottle of glue to become unusable over time. To prevent an opened container of glue from setting before use, it must be stored in an airtight jar or bottle with a package of silica gel. Another convenient way is attaching a hypodermic needle on the opening of glue. After applying, residual glue soon clogs the needle, keeping moisture out. The clog is removed by heating the needle (e.g. by a lighter) before use.

text: Cyanoacrylate is used as a forensic tool to capture latent fingerprints on non-porous surfaces like glass, plastic, etc.[5] Cyanoacrylate is warmed to produce fumes which react with the invisible fingerprint residues and atmospheric moisture to form a white polymer (polycyanoacrylate) on the fingerprint ridges.  The ridges can then be recorded. The developed fingerprints are, on most surfaces (except on white plastic or similar), visible to the naked eye. Invisible or poorly visible prints can be further enhanced by applying a luminescent or non-luminescent stain.

text: While much attention was given to the glue's capacity to bond solid materials, Coover was also the first to recognize and patent cyanoacrylates as a tissue adhesive. First used in the Vietnam War to temporarily patch the internal organs of injured soldiers until conventional surgery could be performed, tissue adhesives are now used worldwide for a variety of sutureless surgical applications.[4]

text: Other inventions[edit]

text: Coover held 460 patents and Super Glue was just one of his many discoveries.[4] He viewed "programmed innovation," a management methodology emphasizing research and development, among his most important work. Implemented at Kodak, programmed innovation resulted in the introduction of 320 new products and sales growth from $1.8 billion to $2.5 billion.[citation needed] Coover later formed an international management consulting practice, advising corporate clients around the world on programmed innovation methodology.[6]

text: Coover received the Southern Chemist Man of the Year Award for his outstanding accomplishments in individual innovation and creativity. He also held the Earle B. Barnes Award for Leadership in Chemical Research Management, the Maurice Holland Award, the IRI Achievement Award,[7] and was a medalist for the Industrial Research Institute.[6] In 1983, Coover was elected to the [National Academy of Engineering]. In 2004, Coover was inducted into the National Inventor's Hall of Fame.[2] In 2010, Coover received the National Medal of Technology and Innovation.[8]

text: Coover died of natural causes at his home in Kingsport, Tennessee, on March 26, 2011.[1]


document_title: Four Weddings and a Funeral

question_text: who plays lydia in four weddings and a funeral

text: Four Weddings and a Funeral

text: Plot[edit]

text: The film follows the adventures of a group of friends through the eyes of Charles, a good-natured but socially awkward man living in London, who becomes smitten with Carrie, an American whom Charles keeps meeting at four weddings and a funeral.

text: The first wedding is in Somerset and is that of Angus and Laura, at which Charles is the best man. Charles and his single friends wonder whether they will ever get married. Charles meets Carrie and spends the night with her. Carrie pretends that, now they have slept together, they will have to get married, to which Charles endeavours to respond before realising she is joking. Carrie observes that they may have missed an opportunity and then returns to America.

text: The second wedding is that of Bernard and Lydia, a couple who became romantically involved at the previous wedding. Charles encounters Carrie again, but she introduces him to her fiancé, Sir Hamish Banks, a wealthy politician. At the reception, Charles finds himself seated with several ex-girlfriends who relate embarrassing stories about his inability to be discreet and afterwards bumps into Henrietta, known among Charles' friends as "Duckface", with whom he had a particularly difficult relationship. Charles retreats to an empty hotel suite, seeing Carrie and Hamish leave in a taxicab, only to be trapped in a cupboard after the newlyweds stumble into the room to have sex. After Charles awkwardly exits the room, Henrietta confronts him about his habit of "serial monogamy", telling him he is afraid of letting anyone get too close to him. Charles then runs into Carrie, and they end up spending another night together.

text: A month later, Charles receives an invitation to Carrie's wedding. While shopping for a present, he coincidentally encounters Carrie and ends up helping her select her wedding dress. Carrie lists her more than thirty sexual partners. Charles later awkwardly tries confessing his love to her and hinting that he would like to have a relationship with her, to no avail.

text: The third wedding is that of Carrie and Hamish. Charles attends, depressed at the prospect of Carrie marrying Hamish. At the reception, Gareth instructs his friends to seek potential mates; Fiona's brother, Tom, stumbles through an attempt to connect with a woman until she reveals that she is the minister's wife, while Charles's flatmate, Scarlett, strikes up a conversation with an American named Chester. As Charles watches Carrie and Hamish dance, Fiona deduces his feelings about Carrie. When Charles asks why Fiona is not married, she confesses that she has loved Charles since they first met years earlier. Charles is appreciative and empathetic but does not requite her love. During the groom's toast, Gareth dies of a heart attack.

text: At Gareth's funeral, his partner Matthew recites the poem "Funeral Blues" by W. H. Auden, commemorating his relationship with Gareth. Charles and Tom discuss whether hoping to find your "one true love" is just a futile effort and ponder that, while their clique have always viewed themselves as proud to be single, Gareth and Matthew were a "married" couple all the while.

text: The fourth wedding is ten months later. Charles has decided to marry Henrietta. However, shortly before the ceremony, Carrie arrives, revealing to Charles that she and Hamish are separated. Charles has a crisis of confidence, which he reveals to his deaf brother David and Matthew. During the ceremony, when the vicar asks whether anyone knows a reason why the couple should not marry, David, who was reading the vicar's lips, asks Charles to translate for him, and says in sign language that he suspects the groom loves someone else. The vicar asks whether Charles does love someone else, and Charles replies, "I do." Henrietta punches Charles and the wedding is halted.

text: Carrie visits Charles to apologise for attending the wedding. Charles confesses that, while standing at the altar, he realised that for the first time in his life he totally and utterly loved one person, "and it wasn't the person standing next to me in the veil." Charles makes a proposal of lifelong commitment without marriage to Carrie, who accepts.

text: Henrietta marries an officer in the Grenadier Guards; David marries his girlfriend Serena; Scarlett marries Chester; Tom marries his distant cousin Deirdre (whom he met, for the second time in 25 years, at Charles's wedding); Matthew finds a new partner; Fiona marries Prince Charles; and Charles and Carrie have a young son.

text: Cast[edit]

text:
Hugh Grant as Charles
Andie MacDowell as Carrie
James Fleet as Tom
Simon Callow as Gareth
John Hannah as Matthew
Kristin Scott Thomas as Fiona
David Bower as David
Charlotte Coleman as Scarlett
Timothy Walker as Angus
Sara Crowe as Laura
Rowan Atkinson as Father Gerald
David Haig as Bernard
Sophie Thompson as Lydia
Corin Redgrave as Sir Hamish Banks
Anna Chancellor as Henrietta

tag: ul

text: Production[edit]

text: The film was shot mainly in London and the Home Counties, including Hampstead, Islington where the final moments take place on Highbury Terrace, Greenwich Hospital, Betchworth in Surrey, Amersham in Buckinghamshire, St Bartholomew-the-Great (wedding number four) and West Thurrock in Essex.[4] Exterior shots of guests arriving for the funeral were filmed in Thurrock, Essex overlooking the River Thames with the backdrop of the Dartford River Crossing and at stately homes in Bedfordshire (Luton Hoo for wedding two's reception) and Hampshire.[5]

text: Music[edit]

text: The original score was composed by British composer Richard Rodney Bennett. The movie also featured a soundtrack of popular songs, including a cover version of The Troggs' "Love Is All Around" performed by Wet Wet Wet that remained at number 1 on the UK Singles Chart for fifteen weeks and was then the ninth (now twelfth) biggest selling single of all time in Britain. This song would later be adapted into "Christmas Is All Around" and sung by the character of Billy Mack in Richard Curtis' 2003 film Love Actually, in which Grant also stars.

text: Reception[edit]

text: Critical response[edit]

text: The film was very well received with critics, currently holding a 95% "Certified Fresh" approval on reviews aggregator Rotten Tomatoes, with the site's consensus stating, "While frothy to a fault, Four Weddings and a Funeral features irresistibly breezy humor, and winsome performances from Hugh Grant and Andie MacDowell."[6] Film critic Roger Ebert gave the film three-and-a-half stars out of four, calling it "delightful and sly", and directed with "light-hearted enchantment" by Newell. He praised Grant's performance, describing it as a kind of "endearing awkwardness".[7]

text: The film had its detractors. Writing for the Chicago Reader, Jonathan Rosenbaum called the film "generic" and "standard issue", stating that the audience shouldn't "expect to remember it ten minutes later".[8] Time magazine writer Richard Corliss was less scathing, but agreed that it was forgettable, saying that people would "forget all about [the movie] by the time they leave the multiplex," even joking at the end of his review that he had forgotten the film's name.[9] The character of Carrie was voted one of the most annoying film characters of all time in a British online poll.[10]

text: Box office[edit]

text: The film earned £27.8 million in the United Kingdom.[11] Upon its North American limited release on 11 March 1994, Four Weddings and a Funeral opened with $138,486 in five theatres.[12] But upon its wide release on 15 April 1994, the film topped the box office with $4,162,489.[13] The film would continue to gross $52.7 million in North America with an additional $193 million internationally, earning $245.7 million worldwide.[1]

text: Accolades[edit]

text: Wins[edit]

text:
Best Film
Best Direction (Mike Newell)
Best Actor (Hugh Grant)
Best Supporting Actress (Kristin Scott Thomas)

text: Best Foreign Film

text: Best Comedy Film

text: César Award for Best Foreign Film

text: Most Promising Actor (Hugh Grant)

text:
Best Actress (Kristin Scott Thomas)
Best Screenplay (Richard Curtis)

text: Best Actor in a Musical or Comedy (Hugh Grant)

text:
British Film of the Year
British Director of the Year (Mike Newell)
British Producer of the Year (Duncan Kenworthy)
British Screenwriter of the Year (Richard Curtis)

text: Best Original Screenplay (Richard Curtis)

text: Film – Screenplay (Richard Curtis)

text: Nominations[edit]

text:
Best Picture (lost to Forrest Gump)
Best Original Screenplay – Richard Curtis (lost to Quentin Tarantino and Roger Avary for Pulp Fiction)

text:
Best Film Music – Richard Rodney Bennett (lost to Backbeat)
Best Original Screenplay – Richard Curtis (lost to Quentin Tarantino and Roger Avary for Pulp Fiction)
Best Supporting Actor – Simon Callow (lost to Samuel L. Jackson for Pulp Fiction)
Best Supporting Actor – John Hannah (lost to Samuel L. Jackson for Pulp Fiction)
Best Supporting Actress – Charlotte Coleman (lost to Kristin Scott Thomas for this film)

text: Outstanding Directoring – Feature Film – Mike Newell (lost to Robert Zemeckis for Forrest Gump)

text:
Best Musical or Comedy (lost to The Lion King)
Best Screenplay – Richard Curtis (lost to Quentin Tarantino and Roger Avary for Pulp Fiction)
Best Actress in a Musical or Comedy – Andie MacDowell (lost to Jamie Lee Curtis for True Lies)

text: Recognition[edit]

text: The film was voted the 27th greatest comedy film of all time by readers of Total Film in 2000. In 2004, the same magazine named it the 34th greatest British film of all time. It is number 96 on Bravo's "100 Funniest Movies".

text: Television series[edit]

text: It was reported in November 2017 that writer/director Richard Curtis was developing an anthology television series based upon the film with producers including Mindy Kaling and Matt Warburton for streaming service Hulu.[14]


document_title: Lunar Roving Vehicle

question_text: where is the lunar rover located on the moon

text: Lunar Roving Vehicle

text: History[edit]

text: The concept of a lunar rover predated Apollo, with a 1952–1954 series in Collier's Weekly magazine by Wernher von Braun and others, "Man Will Conquer Space Soon!" In this, von Braun described a six-week stay on the Moon, featuring 10-ton tractor trailers for moving supplies.

text: In 1956, Mieczysław G. Bekker published two books on land locomotion.[1] At the time, Bekker was a University of Michigan professor and a consultant to the U.S. Army Tank-Automotive Command's Land Locomotion Laboratory. The books provided much of the theoretical base for future lunar vehicle development.

text: Early lunar mobility studies[edit]

text: In the February 1964 issue of Popular Science, von Braun, then director of NASA's Marshall Space Flight Center (MSFC), discussed the need for a lunar surface vehicle, and revealed that studies had been underway at Marshall in conjunction with Lockheed, Bendix, Boeing, General Motors, Brown Engineering, Grumman, and Bell Aerospace.[2]

text: Beginning in the early 1960s, a series of studies centering on lunar mobility were conducted under Marshall. This began with the Lunar Logistics System (LLS), followed by the Mobility Laboratory (MOLAB), then the Lunar Scientific Survey Module (LSSM), and finally the Mobility Test Article (MTA). In early planning for the Apollo program, it had been assumed that two Saturn V launch vehicles would be used for each lunar mission: one for sending the crew aboard a Lunar Surface Module (LSM) to lunar orbit, landing, and returning, and a second for sending an LSM-Truck (LSM-T) with all of the equipment, supplies, and transport vehicle for use by the crew while on the surface. All of the first Marshall studies were based on this dual-launch assumption, allowing a large, heavy, roving vehicle.[3]

text: Grumman and Northrop, in the fall of 1962, began to design pressurized-cabin vehicles, with electric motors for each wheel. At about this same time Bendix and Boeing started their own internal studies on lunar transportation systems. Mieczysław Bekker, now with General Motors Defense Research Laboratories at Santa Barbara, California, was completing a study for NASA's Jet Propulsion Laboratory on a small, unmanned lunar roving vehicle for the Surveyor program. Ferenc Pavlics, originally from Hungary, used a wire-mesh design for "resilient wheels," a design that would be followed in future small rovers.[4]

text: In early 1963, NASA selected Marshall for studies in an Apollo Logistics Support System (ALSS). Following reviews of all earlier efforts, this resulted in a 10-volume report. Included was the need for a pressurized vehicle in the 6,490–8,470 lb (2,940–3,840 kg) weight range, accommodating two men with their expendables and instruments for traverses up to two weeks in duration. In June 1964, Marshall awarded contracts to Bendix and to Boeing, with GM's lab designated as the vehicle technology subcontractor.[5] Bell Aerospace was already under contract for studies of Lunar Flying Vehicles.[6]

text: Even as the Bendix and Boeing studies were underway, Marshall was examining a less ambitious surface exploration activity, the Local Scientific Surface Module (LSSM) This would be composed of a fixed, habitable shelter-laboratory with a small lunar-traversing vehicle that could either carry one man or be remotely controlled. This mission would still require a dual launch with the moon vehicle carried on the "lunar truck”. Marshall’s Propulsion and Vehicle Engineering (P&VE) lab contracted with Hayes International to made a preliminary study of the shelter and its related vehicle.[7]  Because of the potential need for an enclosed vehicle for enlarged future lunar explorations, those design efforts continued for some time, and resulted in several full-scale test vehicles.

text: With pressure from Congress to hold down Apollo costs, Saturn V production was reduced, allowing only a single launch per mission. Any roving vehicle would have to fit on the same Lunar Module as the astronauts. In November 1964, two-rocket models were put on indefinite hold, but Bendix and Boeing were given study contracts for small rovers. The name of the Lunar Excursion Module was changed to simply the Lunar Module, indicating that the capability for powered "excursions" away from a lunar-lander base did not yet exist. There could be no mobile lab — the astronauts would work out of the LM. Marshall continued to also examine unmanned robotic rovers that could be controlled from the Earth.

text: From the beginnings at Marshall, the Brown Engineering Company of Huntsville, Alabama had participated in all of the lunar mobility efforts. In 1965, Brown became the prime support contractor for Marshall's P&VE Laboratory. With an urgent need to determine the feasibility of a two-man self-contained lander, von Braun bypassed the usual procurement process and had P&VE's Advanced Studies Office directly task Brown to design, build, and test a prototype vehicle.[8] While Bendix and Boeing would continue to refine concepts and designs for a lander, test model rovers were vital for Marshall human factors studies involving spacesuit-clad astronauts interfacing with power, telemetry, navigation, and life-support rover equipment. Eduardo San Juan, an immigrant from the Philippines who had led the earlier study by Hayes International, joined Brown to lead the development.[9][10]

text: Brown’s team made full use of the earlier small-rover studies, and commercially available components were incorporated wherever possible. The selection of wheels was of great importance, and almost nothing was known at that time about the lunar surface. The Marshall Space Sciences Laboratory (SSL) was responsible for predicting surface properties, and Brown was also prime support contractor for this lab; Brown set up a test area to examine a wide variety of wheel-surface conditions. To simulate Pavlics' "resilient wheel," a four-foot-diameter inner tube wrapped with nylon ski rope was used. On the small test rover, each wheel had a small electric motor, with overall power provided by standard truck batteries. A roll bar gave protection from overturn accidents.

text: In early 1966, Brown's vehicle became available for examining human factors and other testing. Marshall built a small test track with craters and rock debris where the several different mock-ups were compared; it became obvious that a small rover would be best for the proposed missions. The test vehicle was also operated in remote mode to determine characteristics that might be dangerous to the driver, such as acceleration, bounce-height, and turn-over tendency as it traveled at higher speeds and over simulated obstacles. The test rover’s performance under one-sixth gravity was obtained through flights on a KC-135A aircraft in a Reduced Gravity parabolic maneuver; among other things, the need for a very soft wheel and suspension combination was shown. Although Pavlics' wire-mesh wheels were not initially available for the reduced gravity tests, the mesh wheels were tested on various soils at the Waterways Experiment Station of the U.S. Army Corps of Engineers at Vicksburg, Mississippi. Later, when wire-mesh wheels were tested on low-g flights, the need for wheel fenders to reduce dust contamination was found. The model was also extensively tested at the U.S. Army's Yuma Proving Ground in Arizona, as well as the Army's Aberdeen Proving Ground in Maryland.

text: Apollo Lunar Roving Vehicle[edit]

text: During 1965 and 1967, the Summer Conference on Lunar Exploration and Science brought together leading scientists to assess NASA's planning for exploring the Moon and to make recommendations. One of their findings was that the LSSM was critical to a successful program and should be given major attention. At Marshall, von Braun established the Lunar Roving Task team, and in May 1969, NASA selected the Lunar Roving Vehicle (LRV) for use in manned lunar missions and approved the Manned Lunar Rover Vehicle Program as a Marshall hardware development. Saverio F. "Sonny" Morea was named the LRV program manager.[11]

text: On 11 July 1969, just before the successful Moon landing of Apollo 11, a request for proposal for the final development and building the Apollo LRV was released by Marshall. Boeing, Bendix, Grumman, and Chrysler submitted proposals. Following three months of proposal evaluation and negotiations, Boeing was selected as the Apollo LRV prime contractor on 28 October 1969. Boeing would manage the LRV project under Henry Kudish in Huntsville, Alabama. As a major subcontractor, General Motors' Defense Research Laboratories in Santa Barbara, California, would furnish the mobility system (wheels, motors, and suspension); this effort would be led by Ferenc Pavlics.[12] Boeing in Seattle, Washington, would furnish the electronics and navigation system. Vehicle testing would take place at the Boeing facility in Kent, Washington, and the chassis manufacturing and overall assembly would be at the Boeing facility in Huntsville.[13]

text: The first cost-plus-incentive-fee contract to Boeing was for $19,000,000 and called for delivery of the first LRV by 1 April 1971. Cost overruns, however, led to a final cost of $38,000,000, which was about the same as NASA's original estimate. Four lunar rovers were built, one each for Apollo missions 15, 16, and 17; and one used for spare parts after the cancellation of further Apollo missions. Other LRV models were built: a static model to assist with human factors design; an engineering model to design and integrate the subsystems; two one-sixth gravity models for testing the deployment mechanism; a one-gravity trainer to give the astronauts instruction in the operation of the rover and allow them to practice driving it; a mass model to test the effect of the rover on the LM structure, balance, and handling; a vibration test unit to study the LRV's durability and handling of launch stresses; and a qualification test unit to study integration of all LRV subsystems. A paper by Saverio Morea gives details of the LRV system and its development.[14]

text: LRVs were used for greater surface mobility during the Apollo J-class missions, Apollo 15, Apollo 16, and Apollo 17. The rover was first used on 31 July 1971, during the Apollo 15 mission. This greatly expanded the range of the lunar explorers. Previous teams of astronauts were restricted to short walking distances around the landing site due to the bulky space suit equipment required to sustain life in the lunar environment. The range, however, was operationally restricted to remain within walking distance of the lunar module, in case the rover broke down at any point.[15] The rovers were designed with a top speed of about 8 mph (13 km/h), although Eugene Cernan recorded a maximum speed of 11.2 mph (18.0 km/h), giving him the (unofficial) lunar land-speed record.[16]

text: The LRV was developed in only 17 months and performed all its functions on the Moon with no major anomalies. Scientist-astronaut Harrison Schmitt of Apollo 17 said, "The Lunar Rover proved to be the reliable, safe and flexible lunar exploration vehicle we expected it to be. Without it, the major scientific discoveries of Apollo 15, 16, and 17 would not have been possible; and our current understanding of lunar evolution would not have been possible."[15]

text: The LRVs experienced some minor problems. The rear fender extension on the Apollo 16 LRV was lost during the mission's second extra-vehicular activity (EVA) at station 8 when John Young bumped into it while going to assist Charles Duke. The dust thrown up from the wheel covered the crew, the console, and the communications equipment. High battery temperatures and resulting high power consumption ensued. No repair attempt was mentioned.

text: The fender extension on the Apollo 17 LRV broke when accidentally bumped by Eugene Cernan with a hammer handle. Cernan and Schmitt taped the extension back in place, but due to the dusty surfaces, the tape did not adhere and the extension was lost after about one hour of driving, causing the astronauts to be covered with dust. For their second EVA, a replacement "fender" was made with some EVA maps, duct tape, and a pair of clamps from inside the Lunar Module that were nominally intended for the moveable overhead light. This repair was later undone so that the clamps could be taken inside for the return launch. The maps were brought back to Earth and are now on display at the National Air and Space Museum. The abrasion from the dust is evident on some portions of the makeshift fender.[17][18]

text: The color TV camera mounted on the front of the LRV could be remotely operated by Mission Control in pan and tilt axes as well as zoom. This allowed far better television coverage of the EVA than the earlier missions. On each mission, at the conclusion of the astronauts' stay on the surface, the commander drove the LRV to a position away from the Lunar Module so that the camera could record the ascent stage launch. The camera operator in Mission Control experienced difficulty in timing the various delays so that the LM ascent stage was in frame through the launch. On the third and final attempt (Apollo 17), the launch and ascent were successfully tracked.

text: NASA's rovers, left behind, are among the artificial objects on the Moon, as are the Soviet Union's unmanned rovers, Lunokhod 1 and Lunokhod 2.

text: Features and specifications[edit]

text: The Apollo Lunar Roving Vehicle was an electric-powered vehicle designed to operate in the low-gravity vacuum of the Moon and to be capable of traversing the lunar surface, allowing the Apollo astronauts to extend the range of their surface extravehicular activities. Three LRVs were used on the Moon, one on Apollo 15 by astronauts David Scott and Jim Irwin, one on Apollo 16 by John Young and Charles Duke, and one on Apollo 17 by Eugene Cernan and Harrison Schmitt. The mission commander served as the driver, occupying the left-hand seat of each LRV. Features are available in papers by Morea,[14] Baker,[19] and Kudish.[20]

text: Mass and payload[edit]

text: The Lunar Roving Vehicle had a mass of 460 pounds (210 kg), and was designed to hold a payload of 1,080 pounds (490 kg).[21] This resulted in weights in the approximately one-sixth g on the lunar surface of 77 pounds-force (35 kgf) empty and 260 pounds-force (116 kgf) fully loaded. The frame was 10 feet (3.0 m) long with a wheelbase of 7.5 feet (2.3 m). The height of the vehicle was 3.6 feet (1.1 m). The frame was made of 2219 aluminium alloy tubing welded assemblies and consisted of a three-part chassis that was hinged in the center so it could be folded up and hung in the Lunar Module Quadrant 1 bay, which was kept open to space by omission of the outer skin panel. It had two side-by-side foldable seats made of tubular aluminium with nylon webbing and aluminum floor panels. An armrest was mounted between the seats, and each seat had adjustable footrests and a Velcro-fastened seat belt. A large mesh dish antenna was mounted on a mast on the front center of the rover. The suspension consisted of a double horizontal wishbone with upper and lower torsion bars and a damper unit between the chassis and upper wishbone. Fully loaded, the LRV had a ground clearance of 14 inches (36 cm).

text: Wheels and power[edit]

text: The wheels were designed and manufactured by General Motors Defense Research Laboratories in Santa Barbara, California.[22] Ferenc Pavlics was given special recognition by NASA for developing the "resilient wheel".[23] They consisted of a spun aluminum hub and a 32 inches (81 cm) diameter, 9 inches (23 cm) wide tire made of zinc-coated woven 0.033 inches (0.84 mm) diameter steel strands attached to the rim and discs of formed aluminum. Titanium chevrons covered 50% of the contact area to provide traction. Inside the tire was a 25.5 inches (65 cm) diameter bump stop frame to protect the hub. Dust guards were mounted above the wheels. Each wheel had its own electric drive made by Delco, a direct current (DC) series-wound motor capable of 0.25 horsepower (190 W) at 10,000 rpm, attached to the wheel via an 80:1 harmonic drive, and a mechanical brake unit. Each wheel could free-wheel in case of drive failure.

text: Maneuvering capability was provided through the use of front and rear steering motors. Each series-wound DC steering motor was capable of 0.1 horsepower (75 W). The front and rear wheels could pivot in opposite directions to achieve a tight turning radius of 10 feet (3 m), or could be decoupled so only front or rear would be used for steering.

text: Power was provided by two 36-volt silver-zinc potassium hydroxide non-rechargeable batteries with a capacity of 121 A·h each (a total of 242 A·h), yielding a range of 57 miles (92 km).[16] These were used to power the drive and steering motors and also a 36-volt utility outlet mounted on the front of the LRV to power the communications relay unit or the TV camera. LRV batteries and electronics were passively cooled, using change-of-phase wax thermal capacitor packages and reflective, upward-facing radiating surfaces. While driving, radiators were covered with mylar blankets to minimize dust accumulation. When stopped, the astronauts would open the blankets, and manually remove excess dust from the cooling surfaces with hand brushes.

text: Control and navigation[edit]

text: A T-shaped hand controller situated between the two seats controlled the four drive motors, two steering motors, and brakes. Moving the stick forward powered the LRV forward, left and right turned the vehicle left or right, and pulling backwards activated the brakes. Activating a switch on the handle before pulling back would put the LRV into reverse. Pulling the handle all the way back activated a parking brake. The control and display modules were situated in front of the handle and gave information on the speed, heading, pitch, and power and temperature levels.

text: Navigation was based on continuously recording direction and distance through use of a directional gyro and odometer and feeding this data to a computer that would keep track of the overall direction and distance back to the LM. There was also a Sun-shadow device that could give a manual heading based on the direction of the Sun, using the fact that the Sun moved very slowly in the sky.

text: Usage[edit]

text: Each rover was used on three traverses, one per day over the three-day course of each mission, with the individual performances logged as follows:

text:
mission

total distance

total time

longest single traverse

maximum range from the LM

Apollo 15 (LRV-1)

17.25 miles (27.76 km)

3 h 02 min

7.75 miles (12.47 km)

3.1 miles (5.0 km)

Apollo 16 (LRV-2)

16.50 miles (26.55 km)

3 h 26 min

7.20 miles (11.59 km)

2.8 miles (4.5 km)

Apollo 17 (LRV-3)

22.30 miles (35.89 km)

4 h 26 min

12.50 miles (20.12 km)

4.7 miles (7.6 km)

text: An operational constraint on the use of the LRV was that the astronauts must be able to walk back to the LM if the LRV were to fail at any time during the EVA (called the "Walkback Limit"). Thus, the traverses were limited in the distance they could go at the start and at any time later in the EVA. Therefore, they went to the farthest point away from the LM and worked their way back to it so that, as the life support consumables were depleted, their remaining walk back distance was equally diminished. This constraint was relaxed during the longest traverse on Apollo 17, based on the demonstrated reliability of the LRV and spacesuits on previous missions. A paper by Burkhalter and Sharp provides details on usage.[24]

text: Deployment[edit]

text: Astronaut deployment of the LRV from the LM's open Quadrant 1 bay was achieved with a system of pulleys and braked reels using ropes and cloth tapes. The rover was folded and stored in the bay with the underside of the chassis facing out. One astronaut would climb the egress ladder on the LM and release the rover, which would then be slowly tilted out by the second astronaut on the ground through the use of reels and tapes. As the rover was let down from the bay, most of the deployment was automatic. The rear wheels folded out and locked in place. When they touched the ground, the front of the rover could be unfolded, the wheels deployed, and the entire frame let down to the surface by pulleys.

text: The rover components locked into place upon opening. Cabling, pins, and tripods would then be removed and the seats and footrests raised. After switching on all the electronics, the vehicle was ready to back away from the LM.[21]

text: Locations[edit]

text:
Four flight-ready rovers were manufactured. Three were transported to and left on the Moon via the Apollo 15, 16, and 17 missions, with the fourth rover used for spare parts on the first three following the cancellation of Apollo 18. Since only the upper stages of the lunar excursion modules could return to lunar orbit from the surface, the vehicles, along with the lower stages were abandoned. As a result, the only lunar rovers on display are test vehicles, trainers, and mock-ups.[21] The rover used on Apollo 15 was left at Hadley-Apennine (
26°06′N 3°39′E / 26.10°N 3.65°E / 26.10; 3.65 (Apollo 15 Lunar Roving Vehicle at Hadley–Apennine)
). The rover used on Apollo 16 was left at Descartes (
8°59′S 15°31′E / 8.99°S 15.51°E / -8.99; 15.51 (Apollo 16 Lunar Roving Vehicle at Descartes Highlands)
). The rover used on Apollo 17 was left at Taurus-Littrow (
20°10′N 30°46′E / 20.16°N 30.76°E / 20.16; 30.76 (Apollo 17 Lunar Roving Vehicle at Taurus-Littrow)
) and was seen by the Lunar Reconnaissance Orbiter during passes in 2009 and 2011.

text: Several rovers were created for testing, training, or validation purposes. The engineering mockup is on display at the Museum of Flight in Seattle, Washington. The Qualification Test Unit is on display at the National Air and Space Museum in Washington, D.C. The rover used for vibration testing is on display in the Davidson Saturn V Center at the U.S. Space & Rocket Center in Huntsville, Alabama. Additional test units are on display at the Johnson Space Center in Houston, Texas, and the Kennedy Space Center Visitors Complex in Cape Canaveral, Florida.[25] Replicas of rovers are on display at the National Museum of Naval Aviation in Pensacola, Florida, the Evergreen Aviation & Space Museum in McMinnville, Oregon, and the Kansas Cosmosphere and Space Center in Hutchinson, Kansas. A replica on loan from the Smithsonian Institution is on display at the Mission: Space attraction at Epcot at the Walt Disney World Resort near Orlando, Florida.[25][26]

text: Media[edit]

text:
Play media

Apollo 16 Commander John Young drives Lunar Rover 002

Play media

Dave Scott and Jim Irwin train on Earth to use the Lunar Rover on Apollo 15

text: In media[edit]

text: The LRV appears in the TV miniseries From the Earth to the Moon.


document_title: Are You the One?

question_text: who went in the truth booth episode 2

question_tokens: who went in the truth booth episode 2

text: Are You the One?

text: Series overview[edit]

text:
Season
Originally aired
Number of
cast members
All Perfect
Matches Found?
Total Money Won

Season premiere
Season finale

1
January 21, 2014 (2014-01-21)
March 25, 2014 (2014-03-25)
20
Y
$1,000,000

2
October 6, 2014 (2014-10-06)
December 8, 2014 (2014-12-08)
21
Y
$1,000,000

3
September 24, 2015 (2015-09-24)
November 18, 2015 (2015-11-18)
20
Y
$750,000

4
June 13, 2016 (2016-06-13)
August 15, 2016 (2016-08-15)
20
Y
$750,000

5
January 11, 2017 (2017-01-11)
March 15, 2017 (2017-03-15)
22
N
$0

6
September 20, 2017 (2017-09-20)
December 6, 2017 (2017-12-06)
22
Y
$1,000,000

text: Season 1 – Kauai, Hawaii[edit]

text: Filmed in Hawaii

text: Season one premiered on January 21, 2014.[4]

text:
Guys

Cast Member[5]
Age
Hometown

Adam Kuhn
23
Sterling, Virginia

Andrean "Dre" McCoy
23
Atlanta, Georgia

Chris "Scali" Scali
24
Brooklyn, New York

Chris Tolleson
23
Virginia Beach

Dillan Ostrom
23
Finley, North Dakota

Ethan Diamond
23
Denver, Colorado

Joey Dillon
23
Atlanta, Georgia

John "JJ" Jacobs
25
Washington, DC

Ryan Malaty
24
Greeley, Colorado

Wesley "Wes" Buckles
25
Phoenix, Arizona

Girls

Cast Member
Age
Hometown

Amber Lee
22
Austin, Texas

Ashleigh Feaster
23
Akron, Ohio

Brittany Baldassari
24
Boston, Massachusetts

Coleysia Chestnut
23
Selma, Alabama

Jacinda "Jacy" Rodriguez
24
Carolina, Puerto Rico

Jessica Perez
23
Miami, Florida

Kayla Lusby
22
Greenfield, Tennessee

Paige Brendel
22
Phoenix, Arizona

Shanley McIntee
24
Indianapolis, Indiana

Simone Kelly
23
Atlanta, Georgia

text: Progress[edit]

text:
Guys
Episode

1
2
3
4
5
6/7
8
9
10

Adam
Brittany
Shanley
Brittany
Amber
Shanley
Ashleigh
Shanley
Shanley
Shanley

Chris S.
Ashleigh
Simone
Paige
Paige
Simone
Brittany
Jacy
Ashleigh
Jacy

Chris T.
Jessica
Paige
Simone
Ashleigh
Paige
Paige
Paige
Paige
Paige

Dillan
Coleysia
Jessica
Coleysia
Coleysia
Coleysia
Coleysia
Coleysia
Coleysia
Coleysia

Dre
Jacy
Ashleigh
Ashleigh
Simone
Brittany
Shanley
Simone
Simone
Simone

Ethan
Shanley
Amber
Amber
Kayla
Amber
Amber
Amber
Amber
Amber

John
Simone
Jacy
Jessica
Shanley
Jacy
Jacy
Brittany
Jacy
Ashleigh

Joey
Paige
Brittany
Shanley
Jacy
Jessica
Simone
Jessica
Brittany
Brittany

Ryan
Amber
Kayla
Kayla
Brittany
Ashleigh
Jessica
Ashleigh
Jessica
Jessica

Wes
Kayla
Coleysia
Jacy
Jessica
Kayla
Kayla
Kayla
Kayla
Kayla

Correct Matches
2
4
2
2
5
5
7
8
10

text:
Girls
Episode

1
2
3
4
5
6/7
8
9
10

Amber
Ryan
Ethan
Ethan
Adam
Ethan
Ethan
Ethan
Ethan
Ethan

Ashleigh
Chris S.
Dre
Dre
Chris T.
Ryan
Adam
Ryan
Chris S.
John

Brittany
Adam
Joey
Adam
Ryan
Dre
Chris S.
John
Joey
Joey

Coleysia
Dillan
Wes
Dillan
Dillan
Dillan
Dillan
Dillan
Dillan
Dillan

Jacy
Dre
John
Wes
Joey
John
John
Chris S.
John
Chris S.

Jessica
Chris T.
Dillan
John
Wes
Joey
Ryan
Joey
Ryan
Ryan

Kayla
Wes
Ryan
Ryan
Ethan
Wes
Wes
Wes
Wes
Wes

Paige
Joey
Chris T.
Chris S.
Chris S.
Chris T.
Chris T.
Chris T.
Chris T.
Chris T.

Shanley
Ethan
Adam
Joey
John
Adam
Dre
Adam
Adam
Adam

Simone
John
Chris S.
Chris T.
Dre
Chris S.
Joey
Dre
Dre
Dre

Correct Matches
2
4
2
2
5
5
7
8
10

text: Name  Confirmed Perfect Match  Name  Unconfirmed Perfect Match

text: In Week 5, Ryan Awarded the house 2 Truth Booths, which gave the house their first perfect match in Dillan and Coleysia.

text: Chris T. and Paige were a confirmed match in episode 6, but due to his relationship with Shanley, the episode ended with a "to be continued..." instead of a Match-up Ceremony.

text: Truth Booths[edit]

text:
Couple
Episode
Result

Chris T. & Shanley
1
Not A Match

Ethan & Jessica
2
Not A Match

John & Simone
3
Not A Match

Dillon & Jessica
4
Not A Match

Dre & Ashleigh
5
Not A Match

Dillon & Coleysia
5
Perfect Match

Chris T. & Paige
6/7
Perfect Match

Ryan & Kayla
8
Not A Match

Wes & Kayla
9
Perfect Match

John & Jacy
10
Not A Match

text: MTV.com Clue[edit]

text:
Clue
Perfect Match

1
Ethan & Amber

2
Brittany & Joey

text: After Filming[edit]

text:
Guy
Girl
Current Status

Adam
Shanley
Friends

Adam
Brittany
Not together

Dre
Simone
Not together

Dre
Ashleigh
Friends

Chris S.
Jacy
Not together

Chris T.
Paige
Friends

Chris T.
Shanley
Not together

Dillan
Coleysia
Friends

Dillan
Shanley
Friends

Ethan
Amber
Married with 1 child

Joey
Brittany
Not together

John
Ashleigh
Not together

Ryan
Jessica
Friends

Ryan
Kayla
Not together

Wesley
Kayla
Not together

text: Adam Kuhn & Shanley McIntee returned for the Are You The One?: Second Chances and finished in 3rd place.

text: Baby Special and Reunion[edit]

text: Baby Special and Reunion aired on September 29, 2014. During this reunion, the gender of Ethan and Amber's baby was revealed to be a girl. Both parents-to-be got emotional when they found out they were having a girl. There were also conflicts between Scali and Jacy, Shanley and Chris T, and Ryan and Adam. The end of the episode resulted in most conflicts being resolved. Jacy stated that she would be moving to New York (where Scali is currently based) and they would take their relationship from there. Brittany told the camera that she would be taking Ryan home to meet her parents. [8]

text: The Challenge[edit]

text:
Cast member
Challenge Season
Challenges won
Total Money Earned

Adam Kuhn

Battle of the Exes II

None

$0

Brittany Baldassari

Battle of the Exes II

None

$0

John "JJ" Jacobs

Battle of the Exes II

None

$0

Simone Kelly

Battle of the Exes II, Rivals III, XXX: Dirty 30

None

$0

Challenge in bold indicates that the contestant was a finalist on The Challenge.

text: Season 2 – San Juan, Puerto Rico[edit]

text: Filmed in San Juan, Puerto Rico.

text: Season two premiered on October 6, 2014.[9]It was set in Puerto Rico.[10]This time, one guy has two matches which means that there will be eleven girls, but only ten boys. Christina is revealed as the first girl of the threeway couple. It is a race between Christina and another girl to find her perfect match and be confirmed as such in the Truth-Booth. The first couple of the threeway-couple to do so will end up in the honeymoon-suite. The other girl will have to leave empty-handed.

text: Cast[edit]

text:
Guys

Cast
Age
Hometown

Alex Phillips
23
Los Angeles, California

Anthony Bartolotte
22
Chicago, Illinois

Brandon Tindel
25
Las Vegas, Nevada

Curtis Hadzicki
24
Cardiff, California

Dario Medrano
21
Salem, Massachusetts

Garland Brown
22
St. Louis, Missouri

John Moustis
22
Chicago, Illinois

Layton Jones
25
Greenville, Mississippi

Nathan "Nate" Siebenmark
22
Berrien Springs, Michigan

Tyler "Pratt" Pratt
23
Orlando, Florida

Girls

Cast Member
Age
Hometown

Alexandria Kim
23
Carlsbad, California

Ashley Hall
21
San Marcos, Texas

Briana LaCuesta
21
San Diego, California

Christina LeBlanc
24
Philadelphia, Pennsylvania

Ellie Puckett
23
Hamlet, North Carolina

Jasmine Pendleton
22
San Diego, California

Jenni Knapmiller
22
Burnsville, Minnesota

Jessica Andreatta
22
Westchester, New York

Paris Eike
23
Denver, Colorado

Shelby Yardley
21
Derby, Kansas

Tyler Abron
21
Boston, Massachusetts

text: Progress[edit]

text:
Guys
Week

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10

Alex
Ellie
Christina
Jasmine
Tyler
Christina
Jessica
Jasmine
Jasmine
Jasmine
Jasmine

Anthony
Jessica
Alexandria
Jenni
Jenni
Ashley
Ellie
Briana
Jessica
Alexandria
Alexandria

Brandon
Christina
Tyler
Shelby
Ellie
Jasmine
Ashley
Tyler
Tyler
Briana
Briana

Curtis
Briana
Briana
Briana
Briana
Shelby
Shelby
Shelby
Shelby
Shelby
Shelby

Dario
Ashley
Shelby
Ashley
Shelby
Alexandria
Briana
Ashley
Ashley
Tyler
Ashley

Garland
Alexandria
Jasmine
Alexandria
Jasmine
Tyler
Tyler
Jessica
Alexandria
Jessica
Jessica

John
Jasmine
Ashley
Christina
Christina
Jenni
Alexandria
Jenni
Jenni
Jenni
Jenni

Layton
Jenni
Jessica
Ellie
Jessica
Briana
Jenni
Ellie
Ellie
Ashley
Christina & Tyler

Nathan
Shelby
Jenni
Jessica
Alexandria
Jessica
Jasmine
Christina
Briana
Ellie
Ellie

Pratt
Paris
Paris
Paris
Paris
Paris
Paris
Paris
Paris
Paris
Paris

Correct Matches
2
2
3
1
3
2
6
5
8
10

text:
Girls
Week

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10

Alexandria
Garland
Anthony
Garland
Nathan
Dario
John
N/A
Garland
Anthony
Anthony

Ashley
Dario
John
Dario
N/A
Anthony
Brandon
Dario
Dario
Layton
Dario

Briana
Curtis
Curtis
Curtis
Curtis
Layton
Dario
Anthony
Nathan
Brandon
Brandon

Christina
Brandon
Alex
John
John
Alex
N/A
Nathan
N/A
N/A
Layton

Ellie
Alex
N/A
Layton
Brandon
N/A
Anthony
Layton
Layton
Nathan
Nathan

Jasmine
John
Garland
Alex
Garland
Brandon
Nathan
Alex
Alex
Alex
Alex

Jenni
Layton
Nathan
Anthony
Anthony
John
Layton
John
John
John
John

Jessica
Anthony
Layton
Nathan
Layton
Nathan
Alex
Garland
Anthony
Garland
Garland

Paris
Pratt
Pratt
Pratt
Pratt
Pratt
Pratt
Pratt
Pratt
Pratt
Pratt

Shelby
Nathan
Dario
Brandon
Dario
Curtis
Curtis
Curtis
Curtis
Curtis
Curtis

Tyler
N/A
Brandon
N/A
Alex
Garland
Garland
Brandon
Brandon
Dario
Layton

Correct Matches
2
2
3
1
3
2
6
5
8
10

text: Name  Confirmed Perfect Match  Name  Unconfirmed Perfect Match  N/A  This girl was not chosen in the match-up ceremony

text: Once the truth booth confirms a perfect match, that couple will go to the honeymoon suite and will automatically be paired up for the remainder of the match ceremonies.

text: Truth Booths[edit]

text:
Couple
Episode
Result
Eleventh Girl

Brandon & Jessica
1
Not A Match
N/A

Brandon & Christina
2
Not A Match
N/A

Brandon & Alexandria
3
Not A Match
N/A

Pratt & Paris
4
Perfect Match
Not A Match

Curtis & Shelby
5
Perfect Match
Not A Match

John & Jasmine
6
Not A Match
N/A

John & Jenni
7
Perfect Match
Not A Match

Nathan & Christina
8
Not A Match
N/A

Alex & Jasmine
9
Perfect Match
Not A Match

Dario & Ashley
10
Perfect Match
Not A Match

text: After Filming[edit]

text:
Guy
Girl
Current Status

Alex
Jasmine
Not Together

Anthony
Ellie
Friends

Anthony
Jenni
Friends

Brandon
Briana
Friends

Brandon
Christina
Not Together

Curtis
Briana
Not Together

Curtis
Shelby
Not Together

Curtis
Jenni
Together

Dario
Ashley
Friends

Dario
Shelby
Not Together

Garland
Tyler
Not Together

John
Christina
Friends

John
Jenni
Not Together

Layton
Jessica
Not Together

Layton
Tyler
Not Together

Nathan
Briana
Roommates

Nathan
Ellie
Friends

Pratt
Paris
Not Together

text: Nathan "Nate" Siebenmark & Ellie Puckett returned for the Are You The One?: Second Chances and finished in 9th place.

text: The Challenge[edit]

text:
Cast member
Challenge Season
Challenges won
Total Money Earned

Anthony Bartolotte

Invasion of the Champions

None

$0

Brandon Tindel

Rivals III

None

$0

Briana LaCuesta

Rivals III, XXX: Dirty 30

None

$0

Christina LeBlanc

Battle of the Bloodlines, Rivals III

None

$0

Dario Medrano

Battle of the Bloodlines, Rivals III, Invasion of the Champions, XXX: Dirty 30

None

$0

Nathan "Nate" Siebenmark

Rivals III

None

$0

text: Challenge in bold indicates that the contestant was a finalist on The Challenge.

text: Season 3 – Kona, Hawaii[edit]

text: Filmed in Kona, Hawaii.

text: Season three premiered on September 21, 2015.[11]

text: Cast[edit]

text:
Guys

Cast Member
Age
Hometown

Alec Gonzalez
22
Philadelphia, Pennsylvania

Austin Sheets
22
Addison, Texas

Chuck Mowery
26
Maui, Hawaii

Connor Smith
25
Tinley Park, Illinois

Devin Walker-Molaghan
26
Northampton, Massachusetts

Hunter Barfield
22
Perry, Florida

Mike Crescenzo
24
Stony Brook, New York

Nelson Thomas
26
San Marcos, Texas

Tyler Johnson
25
Indianapolis, Indiana

Zak Longo
26
Toronto, Ontario, Canada

Girls

Cast Member
Age
Hometown

Amanda Garcia
22
Westminster, Colorado

Britni Thornton
24
Augusta, Georgia

Chelsey Perkins
23
Orlando, Florida

Hannah Rathbun
22
Syracuse, New York

Kayla Brackett
22
Sandy Hook, Connecticut

Kiki Cooper
24
Ashburn, Virginia

Cheyenne Floyd
22
Los Angeles, California

Melanie Velez
23
Franklin Square, New York

Rashida Beach
23
Columbia, South Carolina

Stacey Gurnevich
24
Staten Island, New York

text: Progress[edit]

text:
Guys
Week

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10

Alec
Stacey
Chelsey
Stacey
Amanda
Stacey
Stacey
Rashida
Stacey
Stacey
Amanda

Austin
Kiki
Kiki
Amanda
Stacey
Hannah
Cheyenne
Kayla
Kiki
Cheyenne
Britni

Chuck
Hannah
Hannah
Kiki
Kiki
Kiki
Amanda
Melanie
Amanda
Rashida
Melanie

Connor
Chelsey
Kayla
Chelsey
Chelsey
Chelsey
Chelsey
Chelsey
Chelsey
Chelsey
Chelsey

Devin
Melanie
Melanie
Rashida
Hannah
Cheyenne
Rashida
Britni
Rashida
Britni
Rashida

Hunter
Britni
Stacey
Britni
Rashida
Melanie
Britni
Amanda
Britni
Kayla
Hannah

Mike
Amanda
Amanda
Kayla
Kayla
Britni
Melanie
Stacey
Melanie
Kiki
Kiki

Nelson
Cheyenne
Cheyenne
Melanie
Britni
Rashida
Kiki
Kiki
Kayla
Amanda
Stacey

Tyler
Rashida
Rashida
Cheyenne
Melanie
Amanda
Hannah
Cheyenne
Cheyenne
Melanie
Cheyenne

Zak
Kayla
Britni
Hannah
Cheyenne
Kayla
Kayla
Hannah
Hannah
Hannah
Kayla

Correct Matches
2
0
3
2
2
3
3
3
2
10

text:
Girls
Week

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10

Amanda
Mike
Mike
Austin
Alec
Tyler
Chuck
Hunter
Chuck
Nelson
Alec

Britni
Hunter
Zak
Hunter
Nelson
Mike
Hunter
Devin
Hunter
Devin
Austin

Chelsey
Connor
Alec
Connor
Connor
Connor
Connor
Connor
Connor
Connor
Connor

Cheyenne
Nelson
Nelson
Tyler
Zak
Devin
Austin
Tyler
Tyler
Austin
Tyler

Hannah
Chuck
Chuck
Zak
Devin
Austin
Tyler
Zak
Zak
Zak
Hunter

Kayla
Zak
Connor
Mike
Mike
Zak
Zak
Austin
Nelson
Hunter
Zak

Kiki
Austin
Austin
Chuck
Chuck
Chuck
Nelson
Nelson
Austin
Mike
Mike

Melanie
Devin
Devin
Nelson
Tyler
Hunter
Mike
Chuck
Mike
Tyler
Chuck

Rashida
Tyler
Tyler
Devin
Hunter
Nelson
Devin
Alec
Devin
Chuck
Devin

Stacey
Alec
Hunter
Alec
Austin
Alec
Alec
Mike
Alec
Alec
Nelson

Correct Matches
2
0
3
2
2
3
3
3
2
10

text: Due to the blackout in Episode 2, the whole cast lost $250,000, lowering the total money at the end to $750,000, instead of $1,000,000.

text: In Episode 9, Mike was removed from the competition due to an altercation that turned violent with Amanda. Kiki was left without a match that week and was automatically paired with Mike. In the end it turned out that Mike and Kiki were perfect matches.

text: Truth Booths[edit]

text:
Couple
Episode
Result

Hunter & Kiki
1
Not A Match

Devin & Kiki
2
Not A Match

Zak & Kiki
3
Not A Match

Chuck & Britni
4
Not A Match

Connor & Chelsey
5
Perfect Match

Chuck & Kiki
6
Not A Match

Alec & Melanie
7
Not A Match

Nelson & Kiki
8
Not A Match

Hunter & Britni
9
Not A Match

Zak & Kayla
10
Perfect Match

text: After Filming[edit]

text:
Guy
Girl
Current Status

Alec
Amanda
Not Together

Alec
Stacey
Not Together

Austin
Britni
Not Together

Chuck
Britni
Not Together

Chuck
Melanie
Not Together

Connor
Chelsey
Friends

Connor
Kayla
Friends

Devin
Kiki
Friends

Devin
Rashida
Friends

Hunter
Hannah
Not Together

Hunter
Stacey
Friends

Mike
Amanda
Friends

Mike
Kayla
Friends

Mike
Kiki
Not Together

Nelson
Cheyenne
Friends

Nelson
Stacey
Not Together

Tyler
Cheyenne
Friends

Tyler
Rashida
Not Together

Zak
Hannah
Together

Zak
Kayla
Not Together

text: Mike Crescenzo was a castmember of the 32nd season of the Real World, Real World: Seattle – Bad Blood

text: Devin Walker-Molaghan & Rashida Beach returned for the Are You The One?: Second Chances and finished in 1st place earning themselves $170,000.

text: The Challenge[edit]

text:
Cast member
Challenge Season
Challenges won
Total Money Earned

Amanda Garcia

Rivals III, Invasion of the Champions, XXX: Dirty 30

None

$0

Britni Thorton

XXX: Dirty 30, Vendettas

None

$0

Cheyenne Floyd

Rivals III

None

$12,500

Devin Walker-Molaghan

Rivals III, XXX: Dirty 30, Vendettas

None

$12,500

Hunter Barfield

Invasion of the Champions, XXX: Dirty 30

None

$0

Nelson Thomas

Rivals III, Invasion of the Champions, XXX: Dirty 30, Vendettas

None

$36,250

text: Season 4 – Maui, Hawaii[edit]

text: Filmed in Maui, Hawaii. Season four premiered on June 13, 2016.

text: Cast[edit]

text:
Guys

Cast Member
Age
Hometown

Asaf Goren
25
Tel Aviv, Israel

Cam Bruckman
22
Fort Collins, Colorado

Cameron Kolbo
25
Hattiesburg, Mississippi

Giovanni Rivera
23
Bridgeport, Connecticut

John Humphrey
23
Norfolk, Nebraska

Morgan St. Pierre
24
Manhattan, New York

Prosper Muna
24
Albany, New York

Sam Handler
22
Barrington, Illinois

Stephen McHugh
24
Philadelphia, Pennsylvania

Tyler Norman
26
San Diego, California

Girls

Cast Member
Age
Hometown

Alyssa Ortiz
22
Elgin, Illinois

Camille Satterwhite
23
Wheatley Heights, New York

Emma Sweigard
22
Parker, Colorado

Francesca Duncan
22
Manhattan, New York

Julia Rose
22
New Orleans, Louisiana

Kaylen Zahara
22
Compton, California

Mikala Thomas
22
Ocean City, New Jersey

Nicole Brown
22
Denver, Colorado

Tori Deal
23
Astoria, New York

Victoria Wyatt
22
Chino Hills, California

text: Progress[edit]

text:
Guys
Week

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9/10

Asaf
Francesca
Camille
Camille
Camille
Camille
Camille
Francesca
Camille
Tori
Kaylen

Cam
Victoria
Julia
Nicole
Emma
Emma
Victoria
Nicole
Tori
Nicole
Julia

Cameron
Mikala
Mikala
Mikala
Mikala
Mikala
Mikala
Mikala
Mikala
Mikala
Mikala

Giovanni
Kaylen
Kaylen
Kaylen
Kaylen
Francesca
Francesca
Emma
Nicole
Francesca
Francesca

John
Emma
Nicole
Victoria
Victoria
Tori
Emma
Kaylen
Kaylen
Victoria
Victoria

Morgan
Julia
Alyssa
Francesca
Tori
Julia
Tori
Tori
Victoria
Julia
Tori

Prosper
Camille
Emma
Emma
Nicole
Victoria
Kaylen
Victoria
Francesca
Emma
Emma

Sam
Alyssa
Francesca
Alyssa
Alyssa
Alyssa
Alyssa
Alyssa
Alyssa
Alyssa
Alyssa

Stephen
Nicole
Tori
Tori
Julia
Nicole
Julia
Julia
Julia
Kaylen
Nicole

Tyler
Tori
Victoria
Julia
Francesca
Kaylen
Nicole
Camille
Emma
Camille
Camille

Correct Matches
3
3
4
4
4
4
4
2
6
10

text:
Girls
Week

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9/10

Alyssa
Sam
Morgan
Sam
Sam
Sam
Sam
Sam
Sam
Sam
Sam

Camille
Prosper
Asaf
Asaf
Asaf
Asaf
Asaf
Tyler
Asaf
Tyler
Tyler

Emma
John
Prosper
Prosper
Cam
Cam
John
Giovanni
Tyler
Prosper
Prosper

Francesca
Asaf
Sam
Morgan
Tyler
Giovanni
Giovanni
Asaf
Prosper
Giovanni
Giovanni

Julia
Morgan
Cam
Tyler
Stephen
Morgan
Stephen
Stephen
Stephen
Morgan
Cam

Kaylen
Giovanni
Giovanni
Giovanni
Giovanni
Tyler
Prosper
John
John
Stephen
Asaf

Mikala
Cameron
Cameron
Cameron
Cameron
Cameron
Cameron
Cameron
Cameron
Cameron
Cameron

Nicole
Stephen
John
Cam
Prosper
Stephen
Tyler
Cam
Giovanni
Cam
Stephen

Tori
Tyler
Stephen
Stephen
Morgan
John
Morgan
Morgan
Cam
Asaf
Morgan

Victoria
Cam
Tyler
John
John
Prosper
Cam
Prosper
Morgan
John
John

Correct Matches
3
3
4
4
4
4
4
2
6
10

text: Due to the blackout in Episode 8, the whole cast lost $250,000, lowering the total money at the end to $750,000, instead of $1,000,000.

text: Truth Booths[edit]

text:
Couple
Episode
Result

Prosper & Tori
1
Not A Match

John & Julia
2
Not A Match

Cameron & Mikala
3
Perfect Match

Asaf & Tori
4
Not A Match

Giovanni & Kaylen
5
Not A Match

Sam & Alyssa
6
Perfect Match

Cam & Victoria
7
Not A Match

Giovanni & Julia
8
Not A Match

Prosper & Emma
9/10
Perfect Match

Cam & Julia
9/10
Perfect Match

text: After Filming[edit]

text:
Guy
Girl
Current Status

Asaf
Francesca
Friends

Asaf
Kaylen
Friends

Cam
Julia
Not Together

Cam
Victoria
Not Together

Cameron
Mikala
Not Together

Giovanni
Francesca
Friends

Giovanni
Kaylen
Not Together

John
Victoria
Not Together

Morgan
Tori
Friends

Prosper
Emma
Not Together

Sam
Alyssa
Not Together

Stephen
Julia
Together

Stephen
Nicole
Not Together

Tyler
Camille
Friends

text: Asaf Goren & Kaylen Zahara, Cameron Kolbo & Mikala Thomas, Giovanni Rivera & Francesca Duncan and Morgan St. Pierre & Tori Deal returned for the Are You The One?: Second Chances. Rivera and Duncan finished in 8th place after Duncan stole all of the money from Rivera. Goren and Zahara finished in 6th place. Kolbo & Thomas finished in 4th place. St. Pierre and Deal finished in 2nd place earning themselves $25,000.

text: The Challenge[edit]

text:
Cast member
Challenge Season
Challenges won
Total Money Earned

Tori Deal

XXX: Dirty 30

None

$15,000

text: Note: Tori competed on the Champs vs. Stars special with nine other champs and finalists as a replacement for Ashley (RW: Ex-Plosion).

text: Season 5 – Cabarete, Dominican Republic[edit]

text: Filmed in Cabarete, Dominican Republic.

text: Season five premiered on January 11 2017.[12]

text: This season featured 2 big changes. When a couple gets sent into the truth booth to see if they are a perfect match, the rest of the house can either vote to see if they are a perfect match, or earn $150,000, and not see the result of the couple. This only will pertain to certain weeks. Also, if the house blacks out at a match-up ceremony, their money will decrease by 50% each time instead of $250,000.

text: Cast[edit]

text:
Guys

Cast Member
Age
Hometown

Andre Siemers
22
Burnsville, Minnesota

Derrick Henry
23
Charleston, South Carolina

Edward "Eddie" Williams
21
Bridgeton, New Jersey

Hayden Weaver
23
Anderson, Indiana

Jaylan Adlam
23
Atlanta, Georgia

Joey Amoia
23
Buffalo, New York

Michael Halpern
24
Tamarac, Florida

Mike Cerasani
25
Staten Island, New York

Osvaldo Romero
22
Chicago, Illinois

Ozzy Morales
24
San José, Costa Rica

Tyler O'Brien
22
Boca Raton, Florida

Girls

Cast Member
Age
Hometown

Alicia Wright
23
Howell, New Jersey

Carolina Duarte
21
Sammamish, Washington

Casandra Martinez
22
Seabrook, Texas

Gianna Hammer
21
Doylestown, Ohio

Hannah Fugazzi
22
Brentwood, California

Kam Williams
21
Pennsauken, New Jersey

Kari Kowalski
22
New York, New York

Kathryn Palmer
22
Tallahassee, Florida

Shannon Duffy
22
Valencia, California

Taylor Selfridge
22
Yacolt, Washington

Tyranny Todd
22
Augusta, Georgia

text: Progress[edit]

text:
Guys
Week

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10

Andre
Alicia
Hannah
Kari
Casandra
Taylor
Taylor
Casandra
Gianna
Kathryn
Kathryn

Derrick
Kathryn
Alicia
Hannah
Gianna
Tyranny
Tyranny
Kari
Shannon
Casandra
Shannon (Casandra)

Edward
Kam
Shannon
Kam
Alicia
Kam
Kam
Kam
Kam
Kam
Kam

Hayden
Shannon
Taylor
Carolina
Carolina
Carolina
Carolina
Carolina
Carolina
Carolina
Carolina

Jaylan
Casandra
Kam
Casandra
Tyranny
Casandra
Hannah
Tyranny
Tyranny
Tyranny
Tyranny

Joey
Carolina
Carolina
Kathryn
Kathryn
Kathryn
Kathryn
Kathryn
Casandra
Hannah
Hannah (Shannon)

Michael
Hannah
Gianna
Taylor
Kari
Kari
Kari
Hannah
Kathryn
Kari
Kari

Mike
Kari
Casandra
Alicia
Kam
Alicia
Alicia
Gianna
Kari
Alicia
Alicia

Osvaldo
Tyranny
Kari
Tyranny
Taylor
Gianna
Gianna
Taylor
Taylor
Taylor
Taylor

Ozzy
Gianna
Kathryn
Gianna
Hannah
Hannah
Casandra
Alicia
Alicia
Gianna
Gianna

Tyler
Taylor
Tyranny
Shannon
Shannon
Shannon
Shannon
Shannon
Hannah
Shannon
Casandra (Hannah)

Correct Matches
2
0
4
4
4
4
4
5
9
8

text:
Girls
Week

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10

Alicia
Andre
Derrick
Mike
Edward
Mike
Mike
Ozzy
Ozzy
Mike
Mike

Carolina
Joey
Joey
Hayden
Hayden
Hayden
Hayden
Hayden
Hayden
Hayden
Hayden

Casandra
Jaylan
Mike
Jaylan
Andre
Jaylan
Ozzy
Andre
Joey
Derrick
Tyler (Derrick)

Gianna
Ozzy
Michael
Ozzy
Derrick
Osvaldo
Osvaldo
Mike
Andre
Ozzy
Ozzy

Hannah
Michael
Andre
Derrick
Ozzy
Ozzy
Jaylan
Michael
Tyler
Joey
Joey (Tyler)

Kam
Edward
Jaylan
Edward
Mike
Edward
Edward
Edward
Edward
Edward
Edward

Kari
Mike
Osvaldo
Andre
Michael
Michael
Michael
Derrick
Mike
Michael
Michael

Kathryn
Derrick
Ozzy
Joey
Joey
Joey
Joey
Joey
Michael
Andre
Andre

Shannon
Hayden
Edward
Tyler
Tyler
Tyler
Tyler
Tyler
Derrick
Tyler
Derrick (Joey)

Taylor
Tyler
Hayden
Michael
Osvaldo
Andre
Andre
Osvaldo
Osvaldo
Osvaldo
Osvaldo

Tyranny
Osvaldo
Tyler
Osvaldo
Jaylan
Derrick
Derrick
Jaylan
Jaylan
Jaylan
Jaylan

Correct Matches’’
2
0
4
4
4
4
4
5
9
8

text: Name  Confirmed Perfect Match  Name  Unconfirmed Perfect Match  Name  Confirmed Not A Match for the whole season. Correct Matching is in parentheses.

text: Due to the blackout in Episode 2, the whole cast lost $500,000, lowering the total money at the end to $500,000 instead of $1,000,000.

text: In Episode 9, the cast decided to take the trade offer instead of finding out if Derrick and Tyranny were a perfect match, which increased the total money at stake to $650,000

text: In Episode 10, the cast decided to take the trade offer instead of finding out if Joey and Casandra were a perfect match, which increased the total money at stake to $800,000

text: In Episode 10, the cast did not find all their perfect matches, winning no money at the end.

text: After the reunion, final Perfect Matches were revealed as the following:

text:
Guy
Girl

Andre
Kathryn

Derrick
Casandra

Edward
Kam

Hayden
Carolina

Jaylan
Tyranny

Joey
Shannon

Michael
Kari

Mike
Alicia

Osvaldo
Taylor

Ozzy
Gianna

Tyler
Hannah

text: Truth Booths[edit]

text:
Couple
Episode
Result

Hayden & Gianna
1
Not A Match

Andre & Alicia
2
Not A Match

Ozzy & Carolina
3
Not A Match

Osvaldo & Tyranny
4
Not A Match

Edward & Kam
5
Perfect Match

Ozzy & Hannah
6
Not A Match

Andre & Taylor
7
Not A Match

Hayden & Carolina
8
Perfect Match

Derrick & Tyranny
9
Truth Booth Trade

Joey & Casandra
10
Truth Booth Trade

text: Note: In Episode 9, the cast decided to take the $150,000 trade instead of finding out if Derrick and Tyranny were a match. The result of their match is unavailable.

text: Note: In Episode 10, the cast decided to take the $150,000 trade instead of finding out if Joey and Casandra were a match. The result of their match is unavailable.

text: After Filming[edit]

text:
Guy
Girl
Current Status

Andre
Kathryn
Not together

Andre
Taylor
Not together

Derrick
Casandra
Friends

Edward
Alicia
Not together

Edward
Kam
Not together

Hayden
Carolina
Not Together

Hayden
Gianna
Together

Jaylan
Tyranny
Friends

Joey
Shannon
Friends

Michael
Kari
Friends

Mike
Casandra
Not Together

Mike
Alicia
Not Together

Osvaldo
Taylor
Friends

Osvaldo
Tyranny
Friends

Ozzy
Gianna
Friends

Ozzy
Hannah
Not Together

Ozzy
Carolina
Friends

Tyler
Hannah
Friends

Tyler
Shannon
Not Together

Anthony (Season 6)
Shannon
Together

Keith (Season 6)
Carolina
Together

text: Derrick Henry & Casandra Martinez, Hayden Weaver & Carolina Duarte and Mike Cerasani & Alicia Wright returned for the Are You The One?: Second Chances. Henry and Martinez finished in 10th place. Weaver and Duarte finished in 7th place after Weaver stole all of the money from Duarte. Cerasani and Wright finished in 5th Place.

text: The Challenge[edit]

text:
Cast member
Challenge Season [13]
Challenges won
Total Money Earned

Alicia Wright

Vendettas

None

$0

Derrick Henry

XXX: Dirty 30

None

$0

Edward Williams

Vendettas

None

$0

Kam Williams

Vendettas

None

$0

text: Season 6 – New Orleans, Louisiana[edit]

text: Filmed in New Orleans, Louisiana. The new host is Terrence J.

text: Season six premiered on September 20th, 2017.[14]

text: Cast[edit]

text:
Guys

Cast Member
Age
Hometown

Anthony Martin
22
Inglewood, California

Clinton Moxam
22
Palm Bay, Florida

David Shad
24
San Diego, California

Dimitri Valentin
26
Playa del Rey, California

Ethan "E-Money" Cohen
27
Sonoma, California

Joe Torgerson
23
Portland, Oregon

Kareem Fathalla
23
Avenel, New Jersey

Keith Klebacher
24
Manchester, New Jersey

Malcolm Drummer
25
West Palm Beach, Florida

Michael Johnson
21
Knoxville, Tennessee

Tyler Colon
21
Los Angeles, California

Girls

Cast Member
Age
Hometown

Alexis Eddy
21
Mannington, West Virginia

Alivia Hunter
21
Charleston, South Carolina

Audrey Diaz
23
Middletown, New York

Diandra Delgado
21
Teaneck, New Jersey

Geles Rodriguez
23
Los Fresnos, Texas

Jada Allen
21
Union, New Jersey

Keyana Land
23
Boyertown, Pennsylvania

Nicole Spiller
21
Medway, Massachusetts

Nurys Mateo
22
Portland, Maine

Uche Nwosu
23
Grand Rapids, Michigan

Zoe Pugh
22
Scranton, Pennsylvania

text: Progress[edit]

text:
Guys
Week

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10

Anthony
Geles
Diandra
Jada
Keyana
Nicole
Keyana
Keyana
Alivia
Uche
Alexis

Clinton
Uche
Uche
Uche
Uche
Jada
Geles
Geles
Geles
Geles
Geles

Dimitri
Diandra
Nicole
Nurys
Alexis
Uche
Diandra
Diandra
Diandra
Audrey
Nurys

Ethan
Jada
Jada
Alexis
Nicole
Geles
Jada
Zoe
Alexis
Nurys
Zoe

Joe
Zoe
Audrey
Zoe
Zoe
Zoe
Alexis
Uche
Jada
Zoe
Uche

Kareem
Alivia
Alivia
Alivia
Diandra
Alivia
Nurys
Nurys
Nurys
Diandra
Diandra

Keith
Alexis
Alexis
Diandra
Nurys
Alexis
Zoe
Jada
Audrey
Jada
Jada

Malcolm
Nurys
Nurys
Geles
Alivia
Diandra
Alivia
Alexis
Uche
Alexis
Alivia

Michael
Keyana
Keyana
Audrey
Geles
Nurys
Uche
Audrey
Keyana
Keyana
Keyana

Shad
Audrey
Geles
Keyana
Audrey
Audrey
Audrey
Alivia
Zoe
Alivia
Audrey

Tyler
Nicole
Zoe
Nicole
Jada
Keyana
Nicole
Nicole
Nicole
Nicole
Nicole

Correct Matches
3
1
2
3
1
4
5
3
5
11

text:
Girls
Week

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10

Alexis
Keith
Keith
Ethan
Dimitri
Keith
Joe
Malcolm
Ethan
Malcolm
Anthony

Alivia
Kareem
Kareem
Kareem
Malcolm
Kareem
Malcolm
Shad
Anthony
Shad
Malcolm

Audrey
Shad
Joe
Michael
Shad
Shad
Shad
Michael
Keith
Dimitri
Shad

Diandra
Dimitri
Anthony
Keith
Kareem
Malcolm
Dimitri
Dimitri
Dimitri
Kareem
Kareem

Geles
Anthony
Shad
Malcolm
Michael
Ethan
Clinton
Clinton
Clinton
Clinton
Clinton

Jada
Ethan
Ethan
Anthony
Tyler
Clinton
Ethan
Keith
Joe
Keith
Keith

Keyana
Michael
Michael
Shad
Anthony
Tyler
Anthony
Anthony
Michael
Michael
Michael

Nicole
Tyler
Dimitri
Tyler
Ethan
Anthony
Tyler
Tyler
Tyler
Tyler
Tyler

Nurys
Malcolm
Malcolm
Dimitri
Keith
Michael
Kareem
Kareem
Kareem
Ethan
Dimitri

Uche
Clinton
Clinton
Clinton
Clinton
Dimitri
Michael
Joe
Malcolm
Anthony
Joe

Zoe
Joe
Tyler
Joe
Joe
Joe
Keith
Ethan
Shad
Joe
Ethan

Correct Matches
3
1
2
3
1
4
5
3
5
11

text: Name  = Confirmed perfect match  Name  = Unconfirmed perfect match

text: Truth Booths[edit]

text:
Couple
Week
Result

Ethan & Keyana
1
Not A Match

Anthony & Geles
2
Not A Match

Malcolm & Nurys
3
Not A Match

Dimitri & Nicole
4
Not A Match

Clinton & Uche
5
Not A Match

Keith & Alexis
6
Not A Match

Keith & Alivia
7
Not A Match

Michael & Audrey
8
Not A Match

Tyler & Nicole
9
Perfect Match

Dimitri & Jada
10
Not A Match

text: After Filming[edit]

text:
Guy
Girl
Current Status

Anthony
Alexis
Friends

Anthony
Geles
Not Together

Clinton
Geles
Not Together

Clinton
Uche
Together

Dimitri
Nicole
Not Together

Dimitri
Nurys
Friends

Ethan
Zoe
Friends

Joe
Uche
Not Together

Kareem
Alivia
Together

Kareem
Diandra
Friends

Keith
Alexis
Not Together

Keith
Jada
Friends

Malcolm
Alivia
Friends

Malcolm
Diandra
Not Together

Malcolm
Nurys
Not Together

Michael
Audrey
Not Together

Michael
Keyana
Friends

Shad
Audrey
Friends

Tyler
Nicole
Friends

text: At the reunion, it was confirmed that Keith was dating Carolina from season 5 and Anthony was dating Shannon from season 5. Nurys is casually dating Nelson from season 3. [15]

text: Spinoffs[edit]

text: Second Chances[edit]

text: Filmed in Melbourne, Australia. Hosted by Karamo Brown. Premiered March 22, 2017.

text: Cast[edit]

text:
Male Contestant
Female Contestant
Original Season
Finish

Devin Walker-Molaghan
Rashida Beach
AYTO? 3
Winners

Morgan St. Pierre
Tori Deal
AYTO? 4
Runners-Up

Adam Kuhn
Shanley McIntee
AYTO? 1
3rd Place

Cameron Kolbo
Mikala Thomas
AYTO? 4
4th Place

Mike Cerasani
Alicia Wright
AYTO? 5
5th Place

Asaf Goren
Kaylen Zahara
AYTO? 4
6th Place

Hayden Weaver
Carolina Duarte
AYTO? 5
7th Place

Giovanni "Gio" Rivera
Francesca Duncan
AYTO? 4
8th Place

Nathan "Nate" Siebenmark
Ellie Puckett
AYTO? 2
9th Place

Derrick Henry
Casandra Martinez
AYTO? 5
10th Place

text: Elimination progress[edit]

text:
Teams
Episodes

1
2
3
4[a]
5
6
7
8
9
10

Devin & Rashida
1st
6th
4th
N/A
1st
2nd
1st
2nd
1st
1st

Morgan & Tori
6th
3rd
1st
1st
2nd
4th
3rd
4th
2nd
2nd

Adam & Shanley
3rd
4th
2nd
N/A
4th
3rd
4th
1st
3rd
3rd

Cameron & Mikala
7th
5th
3rd
3rd
3rd
1st
2nd
3rd
4th

Mike & Alicia
9th
1st
6th
2nd
5th
5th
5th

Asaf & Kaylen
2nd
8th
8th
7th
6th

Hayden & Carolina
8th
2nd
5th
N/A

Giovanni & Francesca
5th
7th
7th

Nate & Ellie
4th
9th

Derrick & Casandra
10th

text: Bank Accounts[edit]

text:
Males
Episodes

1
2
3
4[a]
5
6
7
8
9
10

Devin
$40,000
$40,000
$40,000
$40,000
$60,000
$70,000
$90,000
$100,000
$120,000
$170,000

Morgan
$20,000
$25,000
$45,000
$65,000
$75,000
$75,000
$80,000
$40,000
$50,000
$25,000

Adam
$25,000
$25,000
$35,000
$35,000
$35,000
$40,000
$40,000
$60,000
$60,000
$0

Cameron
$20,000
$20,000
$25,000
$30,000
$35,000
$55,000
$65,000
$65,000
$0

Mike
$20,000
$40,000
$40,000
$50,000
$50,000
$25,000
$0

Asaf
$30,000
$30,000
$15,000
$7,500
$0

Hayden
$20,000
$30,000
$30,000
$30,000

Giovanni
$20,000
$20,000
$0

Nate
$20,000
$0

Derrick
$0

text:
Females
Episodes

1
2
3
4[a]
5
6
7
8
9
10

Rashida
$40,000
$40,000
$40,000
$40,000
$60,000
$70,000
$90,000
$100,000
$120,000
$170,000

Tori
$20,000
$25,000
$45,000
$65,000
$75,000
$75,000
$80,000
$40,000
$50,000
$25,000

Shanley
$25,000
$25,000
$35,000
$35,000
$35,000
$40,000
$40,000
$60,000
$60,000
$0

Mikala
$20,000
$20,000
$25,000
$30,000
$35,000
$55,000
$65,000
$65,000
$0

Alicia
$20,000
$40,000
$40,000
$50,000
$50,000
$25,000
$0

Kaylen
$30,000
$30,000
$15,000
$7,500
$0

Carolina
$20,000
$30,000
$30,000
$0

Francesca
$20,000
$20,000
$20,000

Ellie
$20,000
$0

Casandra
$0

text: Notes[edit]

text: ^ Jump up to: a b c In Episode 4, only the top 3 teams and the last place team were revealed. Therefore, the 3 teams whose placement wasn't revealed didn't have a change in money.

tag: ol

text: Episodes[edit]

text: International versions[edit]

text:
Country
Local title
Host(s)
Channel
Broadcast
Jackpot

 Brazil
Are You the One? Brasil
Felipe Titto (1-3)
Caio Castro (4)
MTV
February 1, 2015
R$500,000

 Denmark
Det perfekte match
Oliver Bjerrehuus
Kanal 4
February 5, 2015

 Mexico
Are You the One? El Match Perfecto
Roberto Carlo (1)
Vadhir Derbez (2)
MTV
September 20, 2016
US$200,000

 France
10 couples parfaits
Elsa Fayer
NT1
July 3, 2017
€200,000

 Sweden
Are You the One? Sverige

TV3
2018